Visible carbon emissions vs. invisible value-added: Re-evaluating the emissions responsibility of multinational enterprises in global value chains

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108262
Yunfeng Yan , Xiyuan Li , Ran Wang , Bo Meng , Zhongxiu Zhao , Xuemeng Li
{"title":"Visible carbon emissions vs. invisible value-added: Re-evaluating the emissions responsibility of multinational enterprises in global value chains","authors":"Yunfeng Yan ,&nbsp;Xiyuan Li ,&nbsp;Ran Wang ,&nbsp;Bo Meng ,&nbsp;Zhongxiu Zhao ,&nbsp;Xuemeng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transnational investments led by multinational enterprises (MNEs) promote the redistribution of environmental and economic costs across countries, making value-added attribution and carbon emissions responsibility “mismatched” between developed and developing economies. This study focuses on the evaluation of the “real” emissions responsibility of different economies by matching the value-added and the carbon emissions generated by MNEs through a factor income-based accounting framework. We find that from 2005 to 2016, developed economies' “real” value-added were underestimated by 287.23−766.50 billion USD, and emissions were underestimated by 415.37−489.63 Mt. under the existing accounting framework, while the value-added and emissions of developing economies were significantly overestimated. The cumulative net carbon transfer from developed economies to developing economies through MNEs' investment was as high as 1800.80 Mt. from 2005 to 2016, and if we monetize these transferred emissions, we will get a capital pool worth 26.61 billion USD, which can be provided as an incentive fund to tackle with climate change in developing economies. Our study provides a new perspective on emissions responsibility sharing among developed and developing countries, emphasizes the role of MNEs in global emission generation, and encourages MNEs to pledge their emission reduction goals as global agents in the fight against climate change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transnational investments led by multinational enterprises (MNEs) promote the redistribution of environmental and economic costs across countries, making value-added attribution and carbon emissions responsibility “mismatched” between developed and developing economies. This study focuses on the evaluation of the “real” emissions responsibility of different economies by matching the value-added and the carbon emissions generated by MNEs through a factor income-based accounting framework. We find that from 2005 to 2016, developed economies' “real” value-added were underestimated by 287.23−766.50 billion USD, and emissions were underestimated by 415.37−489.63 Mt. under the existing accounting framework, while the value-added and emissions of developing economies were significantly overestimated. The cumulative net carbon transfer from developed economies to developing economies through MNEs' investment was as high as 1800.80 Mt. from 2005 to 2016, and if we monetize these transferred emissions, we will get a capital pool worth 26.61 billion USD, which can be provided as an incentive fund to tackle with climate change in developing economies. Our study provides a new perspective on emissions responsibility sharing among developed and developing countries, emphasizes the role of MNEs in global emission generation, and encourages MNEs to pledge their emission reduction goals as global agents in the fight against climate change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
看得见的碳排放与看不见的增值:重新评估跨国企业在全球价值链中的排放责任
由跨国企业(MNEs)主导的跨国投资促进了环境和经济成本在各国间的重新分配,使得发达经济体和发展中经济体的附加值归属和碳排放责任 "不匹配"。本研究通过基于要素收入的核算框架,对跨国企业产生的附加值和碳排放量进行匹配,重点评估不同经济体的 "真实 "排放责任。我们发现,从 2005 年到 2016 年,发达经济体的 "真实 "增加值在现有核算框架下被低估了 2872.3-766.50 亿美元,排放量被低估了 415.37-489.63 兆吨,而发展中经济体的增加值和排放量被明显高估。从 2005 年到 2016 年,通过跨国企业的投资,发达经济体向发展中经济体的累计净碳转移量高达 1800.80 Mt.,如果我们将这些转移的排放量货币化,我们将得到一个价值 266.1 亿美元的资金池,该资金池可作为发展中经济体应对气候变化的激励基金。我们的研究为发达国家和发展中国家之间的排放责任分担提供了一个新的视角,强调了跨国企业在全球排放中的作用,并鼓励跨国企业承诺其减排目标,成为应对气候变化的全球行动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
If there is waste, there is a system: Understanding Victoria's circular economy transition from a systems thinking perspective Raising awareness of climate change: Nature, activists, politicians? Back to the future: An experiment on ecological restoration Buzzword or breakthrough beyond growth? The mainstreaming of the Wellbeing Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1