Sex and Gender-related Disparities in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Heart Transplantation.

IF 3.8 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Current Heart Failure Reports Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1007/s11897-024-00670-0
Andrea Severo Sánchez, Javier González Martín, Javier de Juan Bagudá, Laura Morán Fernández, Christian Muñoz Guijosa, Fernando Arribas Ynsaurriaga, Juan Francisco Delgado, María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena
{"title":"Sex and Gender-related Disparities in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Heart Transplantation.","authors":"Andrea Severo Sánchez, Javier González Martín, Javier de Juan Bagudá, Laura Morán Fernández, Christian Muñoz Guijosa, Fernando Arribas Ynsaurriaga, Juan Francisco Delgado, María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena","doi":"10.1007/s11897-024-00670-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Limited research has been conducted on sex disparities in heart transplant (HT). The aim of this review is to analyse the available evidence on the influence of sex and gender-related determinants in the entire HT process, as well as to identify areas for further investigation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Although women make up half of the population affected by heart failure and related mortality, they account for less than a third of HT recipients. Reasons for this inequality include differences in disease course, psychosocial factors, concerns about allosensitisation, and selection or referral bias in female patients. Women are more often listed for HT due to non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and have a lower burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Although long-term prognosis appears to be similar for both sexes, there are significant disparities in post-HT morbidity and causes of mortality (noting a higher incidence of rejection in women and of malignancy and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in men). Additional research is required to gain a better understanding of the reasons behind gender disparities in eligibility and outcomes following HT. This would enable the fair allocation of resources and enhance patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10830,"journal":{"name":"Current Heart Failure Reports","volume":" ","pages":"367-378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Heart Failure Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-024-00670-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Limited research has been conducted on sex disparities in heart transplant (HT). The aim of this review is to analyse the available evidence on the influence of sex and gender-related determinants in the entire HT process, as well as to identify areas for further investigation.

Recent findings: Although women make up half of the population affected by heart failure and related mortality, they account for less than a third of HT recipients. Reasons for this inequality include differences in disease course, psychosocial factors, concerns about allosensitisation, and selection or referral bias in female patients. Women are more often listed for HT due to non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and have a lower burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Although long-term prognosis appears to be similar for both sexes, there are significant disparities in post-HT morbidity and causes of mortality (noting a higher incidence of rejection in women and of malignancy and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in men). Additional research is required to gain a better understanding of the reasons behind gender disparities in eligibility and outcomes following HT. This would enable the fair allocation of resources and enhance patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏移植临床特征和结果中与性别相关的差异。
综述目的:有关心脏移植(HT)中性别差异的研究十分有限。本综述旨在分析在整个心脏移植过程中性别和性别相关决定因素影响的现有证据,并确定需要进一步调查的领域:最近的研究结果:尽管女性占心力衰竭及相关死亡率患者的一半,但她们在接受高温热疗的患者中所占比例却不到三分之一。造成这种不平等的原因包括病程差异、社会心理因素、对异体敏感的担忧以及女性患者的选择或转诊偏差。由于非缺血性心肌病,女性更常被列入接受高密度脂蛋白胆固醇治疗的名单,而且其心血管风险因素的负担较低。虽然男女患者的长期预后似乎相似,但 HT 术后的发病率和死亡原因存在显著差异(女性患者的排斥反应发生率较高,男性患者的恶性肿瘤和心脏异体移植血管病变发生率较高)。需要开展更多的研究,以更好地了解在接受高密度置换术的资格和结果方面存在性别差异的原因。这将有助于公平分配资源,加强对患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Heart Failure Reports
Current Heart Failure Reports Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of heart failure. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as investigative, pharmacologic, and nonpharmacologic therapies, pathophysiology, and prevention. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Cardiogenic Shock: Focus on Non-Cardiac Biomarkers. Biomarkers of Hemodynamic Congestion in Heart Failure. Heart Failure in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Clinical Implications. Screening for Heart Failure: Biomarkers to Detect Heightened Risk in the General Population. Troponin Elevation in Asymptomatic Cancer Patients: Unveiling Connections and Clinical Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1