Current Heart Failure Reports最新文献

Purpose of review: The purpose of this review is to describe the evidence behind various blood and imaging-based biomarkers that can improve the identification of congestion when not clearly evident on routine examination.

Recent findings: The natriuretic peptides (NPs) BNP and NT-proBNP have been shown to closely correlate with intra-cardiac filling pressures, both at baseline and when trended following improvement in congestion. Additionally, NPs rise well before clinical congestion is apparent so can be used as a tool to help identify subclinical HF decompensation. Additional serum-based biomarkers including MR-proANP and CA-125 can be helpful in assisting with diagnostic certainty when BNP or NT-proBNP are in the "grey zone" or when factors are present which may confound NP levels. Additionally, the emerging use of ultrasound techniques may enhance our ability to fine-tune the assessment and treatment of congestion. Biomarkers, including the blood-based natriuretic peptides and markers on bedside point of care ultrasound, can be used as non-invasive indices of hemodynamic congestion. These biomarkers are particularly valuable to incorporate when the degree of a patient's congestion is not apparent on clinical exam, and they can provide important prognostic information and help guide clinical management.

Nearly half of heart transplant recipients will be diagnosed with cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) within five years after transplantation. Advanced CAV can lead to worsening heart failure as well as arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The only curative therapy for end-stage CAV is re-transplantation. Current diagnostic methods are invasive and limited by poor sensitivity in early disease. Despite its high prevalence in the post-transplantpopulation, the underlying pathophysiology of this condition has yet to be fully described. It is thought to be primarily related to endothelial dysfunction, immune activation, and cardiometabolic disease. Biomarkers reflecting these underlying processes, particularly endothelial injury and immune activation, have shown early promise in discriminating prevalent CAV. Next-generation sequencing technologies such as proteomic and transcriptomic profiling have also provided further insight into the pathophysiology of CAV through the identification of novel biomarkers. Ultimately, these biomarkers may have a role in not only diagnosing CAV but also highlighting potential targets for disease-specific therapies. In this article, we review the current data for biomarkers in CAV and discuss future directions for biomarker identification..

Purpose of review: Heart failure (HF) represents a growing global burden of morbidity and mortality. Identifying individuals at risk for HF development is increasingly important, particularly given the advent of disease-modifying therapies for HF as well as its major risk factors such as obesity actalnd diabetes. We aim to review the key circulating biomarkers associated with future HF which may contribute to HF risk prediction.

Recent findings: While current guidelines recommend the use of natriuretic peptides and cardiac troponins in HF risk stratification, there are a diverse array of other emerging protein, metabolic, transcriptomic, and genomic biomarkers of future HF development. These biomarkers not only lend insight into the underlying pathophysiology of HF, which spans inflammation to cardiac fibrosis, but also offer an opportunity to further refine HF risk in addition to established biomarkers. As evolving techniques in molecular biology enable an increased understanding of the complex biologic contributions to HF pathophysiology, there is an important opportunity to construct integrated clinical and multi-omic models to best capture HF risk. Moving forward, future studies should seek to understand the contributions of sex differences, underlying comorbidity burden, and HF subtypes to an individual's HF risk. Further studies are necessary to fully define the clinical utility of biomarker screening approaches to refine HF risk assessment, as well as to link risk assessment directly to preventive strategies for HF.

Purpose of review: This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of genetic markers associated with heart failure (HF) and its underlying causative diseases, such as cardiomyopathies. It highlights the relevance of genetic biomarkers in diagnosing HF, predicting prognosis, potentially identifying its preclinical stages and identifying targets to enable the implementation of individualized medicine approaches.

Recent findings: The prevalence of HF is increasing due to an aging population but with greater access to disease-modifying therapies. Advanced diagnostic tools such as cardiac magnetic resonance, nuclear imaging, and AI-enabled diagnostic testing are now being utilized to further characterize HF patients. Additionally, the importance of genetic testing in HF diagnosis and management is increasingly being recognized. Genetic biomarkers, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and rare genetic variants, are emerging as crucial tools for diagnosing HF substrates, determining prognosis and increasingly directing therapy. These genetic insights are key to optimizing HF management and delivering personalized treatment tailored to individual patients. HF is a complex syndrome affecting millions globally, characterized by high mortality and significant economic burden. Understanding the underlying etiologies of HF is essential for improving management and clinical outcomes. Recent advances highlight the use of multimodal assessments, including AI-enabled diagnostics and genetic testing, to better characterize and manage HF. Genetic biomarkers are particularly promising in identifying preclinical HF stages and providing personalized treatment options. The genetic contribution to HF is heterogeneous, with both monogenic and polygenic bases playing a role. These developments underscore the shift towards personalized medicine in HF management.

Purpose of the review: Elevated troponin levels are well established e.g., for the diagnosis of suspected acute coronary syndrome in symptomatic patients. In contrast, troponin elevations in asymptomatic cancer patients emerge as a complex phenomenon, challenging traditional perceptions of its association solely with cardiac events.

Recent findings: Recent data support the predictive value of cardiac biomarker for all-cause mortality and cardiotoxicity in cancer patients. This review gives an overview about the current literature about cardiac troponins in prediction and identification of high-risk cancer patients. The overview is focusing on diagnostic challenges, biomarker significance, and gaps of knowledge. Latest publications highlight the relevance of cardiac troponin in risk analysis before cancer treatment as well as a potential diagnostic gatekeeper for further cardiological diagnostics and therapy.

Purpose of review: To examine the evolving multifaceted nature of cardiogenic shock (CS) in the context of non-cardiac biomarkers that may improve CS management and risk stratification.

Recent findings: There are increasing data highlighting the role of lactate, glucose, and other markers of inflammation and end-organ dysfunction in CS. These biomarkers provide a more comprehensive understanding of the concurrent hemo-metabolic and cellular disturbances observed in CS and offer insights beyond standard structural and functional cardiac assessments. Non-cardiac biomarkers both refine the diagnostic accuracy and improve the prognostic assessments in CS. Further studies revolving around novel biomarkers are warranted to support more targeted and effective therapeutic and management interventions in these high-risk patients.

Purpose of review: This review focuses on the association between RA and heart failure, highlighting the role of inflammation and the prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in this population.

Recent findings: The incidence of heart failure in RA patients is two to three times higher than in the general population, with inflammation playing a significant role independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. HFpEF accounts for about half of heart failure cases and is increasingly recognized in RA patients, although it remains underdiagnosed. Atypical presentations and non-specific symptoms further complicate diagnosis. Early control of inflammation has been shown to reduce the risk of heart failure development and progression, improving both morbidity and mortality outcomes. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease affecting approximately 1% of the population, with cardiovascular disease being the leading cause of premature death in these patients.

Purpose of review: The co-occurrence of heart failure (HF) and cancer represents a complex and multifaceted medical challenge. Patients with prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly HF, exhibit an increased risk of cancer development, raising questions about the intricate interplay between these two prevalent conditions. This review aims to explore the evolving landscape of cancer development in patients with HF, shedding light on potential mechanisms, risk factors, and clinical implications.

Recent findings: Epidemiological data suggests higher cancer incidences and higher cancer mortality in HF patients, which are potentially more common in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction due to related comorbidities. Moreover, recent preclinical data identified novel pathways and mediators including the protein SerpinA3 as potential drivers of cancer progression in HF patients, suggesting HF as an individual risk factor for cancer development. The review emphasizes preliminary evidence supporting cancer development in patients with HF, which offers several important clinical interventions such as cancer screening in HF patients, prevention addressing both HF and cancer, and molecular targets to treat cancer. However, there is need for more detailed understanding of molecular and cellular cross-talk between cancer and HF which can be derived from prospective assessments of cancer-related outcomes in CV trials and preclinical research of molecular mechanisms.

Purpose of review: Cardiac sarcoidosis and other inflammatory cardiomyopathies are disorders causing cardiac inflammation and leading to heart failure, arrythmias and cardiac arrest. Diagnosis of these entities remains challenging and multimodal. Thus, there is a growing need to develop reliable biomarkers that can aid in the diagnosis. This review aims to summarize and highlight recent findings in the field of biomarkers for cardiac sarcoidosis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy.

Recent findings: Multiple categories of biomarkers including novel molecules are being investigated with the latest evidence showing promising results. Some of these biomarkers are proven to be useful as diagnostic and prognostic aids in cardiac sarcoid and inflammatory cardiomyopathy. The identification of cost-effective and accurate biomarkers is useful not only for enhancing diagnostic accuracy but also for informing therapeutic decision-making processes. This advancement would facilitate the timely institution of immunosuppressive therapies, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.

Purpose of review: This review examines the pathophysiological interactions between COVID-19 and heart failure, highlighting the exacerbation of heart failure in COVID-19 patients. It focuses on the complex mechanisms driving worse outcomes in these patients.

Recent findings: Patients with pre-existing heart failure experience more severe symptoms and higher mortality rates due to mechanisms such as cytokine storms, myocardial infarction, myocarditis, microvascular dysfunction, thrombosis, and stress cardiomyopathy. Elevated biomarkers like troponin and natriuretic peptides correlate with severe disease. Long-term cardiovascular risks for COVID-19 survivors include increased incidence of heart failure, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock. COVID-19 significantly impacts patients with pre-existing heart failure, leading to severe symptoms and higher mortality. Elevated cardiac biomarkers are indicators of severe disease. Acute and long-term cardiovascular complications are common, calling for ongoing research into targeted therapies and improved management strategies to better prevent, diagnose, and treat heart failure in the context of COVID-19.