{"title":"Charcot and recent French cinema.","authors":"Ariane St-Denis, Rami Massie","doi":"10.1080/0964704X.2024.2362110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the scientific world, Professor Jean-Martin Charcot is known for his contribution to the establishment of the anatomo-clinical method in neurology in Paris at the Salpêtrière hospital. However, media attention in the late 1800s has focused on his work on hysteria. In this article, we aim to review how he has been depicted in two recent French movies: <i>Augustine</i> (2012) and <i>Le Bal des Folles</i> (<i>The Mad Women's Ball</i>) (2021). We will compare his image in those two films to articles at the time of his death and contrast how he is represented in other biographical works. Both in the newspapers and in the movies, Charcot's public lessons and experimental work on hypnosis in hysteria are put forward. The two movies offer a new perspective, as both directors were women, and both movies focus on a woman patient's journey at La Salpêtrière. His depiction remains superficial in <i>Le Bal des Folles</i>, portraying a cold, insensitive, and despotic approach to patients. He plays a more central role in <i>Augustine</i>, in which he develops intimacy with one of his patients and a more human and caring side is displayed, in parallel to his authoritative and meticulous figure. Both movies refer to him as a divine authority, but they also allude to his scientific method. In summary, Charcot's recent representations in cinema add a woman's perspective to life under Charcot at La Salpêtrière, which continues to shape further the image we have of this founder of modern neurology.</p>","PeriodicalId":49997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2024.2362110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the scientific world, Professor Jean-Martin Charcot is known for his contribution to the establishment of the anatomo-clinical method in neurology in Paris at the Salpêtrière hospital. However, media attention in the late 1800s has focused on his work on hysteria. In this article, we aim to review how he has been depicted in two recent French movies: Augustine (2012) and Le Bal des Folles (The Mad Women's Ball) (2021). We will compare his image in those two films to articles at the time of his death and contrast how he is represented in other biographical works. Both in the newspapers and in the movies, Charcot's public lessons and experimental work on hypnosis in hysteria are put forward. The two movies offer a new perspective, as both directors were women, and both movies focus on a woman patient's journey at La Salpêtrière. His depiction remains superficial in Le Bal des Folles, portraying a cold, insensitive, and despotic approach to patients. He plays a more central role in Augustine, in which he develops intimacy with one of his patients and a more human and caring side is displayed, in parallel to his authoritative and meticulous figure. Both movies refer to him as a divine authority, but they also allude to his scientific method. In summary, Charcot's recent representations in cinema add a woman's perspective to life under Charcot at La Salpêtrière, which continues to shape further the image we have of this founder of modern neurology.
在科学界,让-马丁-沙尔科教授因其在巴黎萨尔佩特里耶尔医院建立神经病学解剖临床方法的贡献而闻名于世。然而,19 世纪晚期媒体关注的焦点却集中在他对癔病的研究上。在本文中,我们将回顾他在最近两部法国电影中的形象:《奥古斯丁》(2012 年)和《疯女人舞会》(2021 年)。我们将把他在这两部电影中的形象与他去世时的文章进行比较,并对比他在其他传记作品中的形象。在报纸和电影中,沙尔科的公开课和催眠治疗癔病的实验工作都得到了介绍。两部电影提供了一个新的视角,因为两位导演都是女性,而且两部电影都聚焦于一位女病人在萨尔佩特利耶的旅程。在《Le Bal des Folles》中,他对病人的刻画依然肤浅,表现出冷漠、麻木和专横的态度。在《奥古斯丁》中,他扮演了一个更为重要的角色,在这部影片中,他与一位病人建立了亲密的关系,展现出更多人性和关怀的一面,与他的权威和一丝不苟的形象并行不悖。两部电影都将他视为神圣的权威,但同时也暗指他的科学方法。总之,近期电影中对沙尔科的表现为沙尔科在萨尔佩特里耶的生活增添了女性视角,这将继续进一步塑造这位现代神经学奠基人的形象。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the History of the Neurosciences is the leading communication platform dealing with the historical roots of the basic and applied neurosciences. Its domains cover historical perspectives and developments, including biographical studies, disorders, institutions, documents, and instrumentation in neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropsychology, and the behavioral neurosciences. The history of ideas, changes in society and medicine, and the connections with other disciplines (e.g., the arts, philosophy, psychology) are welcome. In addition to original, full-length papers, the journal welcomes informative short communications, letters to the editors, book reviews, and contributions to its NeuroWords and Neurognostics columns. All manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by an Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, full- and short-length papers are subject to peer review (double blind, if requested) by at least 2 anonymous referees.