Benefits and Barriers of Using Virtual Reality in Teaching Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Scoping Review.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001660

Ragi George, Sharon K Titus

{"title":"Benefits and Barriers of Using Virtual Reality in Teaching Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ragi George, Sharon K Titus","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although studies have been conducted using virtual reality (VR) in nursing education, evidence distinguishing the benefits and barriers of adopting VR pedagogical methods to teach undergraduate nursing students is not well-defined in nursing literature.Purpose: To identify current evidence on the benefits and barriers of adopting VR as a pedagogical method in nursing education.Methods: A scoping review of 6 databases using PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Data were managed using Covidence® software. Table of Evidence illustrates the themes.Results: Seventeen articles identified 5 thematic benefits of VR (knowledge acquisition, student engagement, improved self-confidence, teaching strategy, and cost factors) and 4 barriers (physical discomfort, learning outcome challenges, challenges to integrating into curricula, and technology challenges).Conclusions: VR is an effective teaching-learning strategy to reinforce nursing concepts and build competencies. It is not a substitute for clinical education.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although studies have been conducted using virtual reality (VR) in nursing education, evidence distinguishing the benefits and barriers of adopting VR pedagogical methods to teach undergraduate nursing students is not well-defined in nursing literature.

Purpose: To identify current evidence on the benefits and barriers of adopting VR as a pedagogical method in nursing education.

Methods: A scoping review of 6 databases using PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Data were managed using Covidence® software. Table of Evidence illustrates the themes.

Results: Seventeen articles identified 5 thematic benefits of VR (knowledge acquisition, student engagement, improved self-confidence, teaching strategy, and cost factors) and 4 barriers (physical discomfort, learning outcome challenges, challenges to integrating into curricula, and technology challenges).

Conclusions: VR is an effective teaching-learning strategy to reinforce nursing concepts and build competencies. It is not a substitute for clinical education.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

在护理本科生教学中使用虚拟现实技术的益处和障碍：范围综述。

背景：尽管在护理教育中使用虚拟现实（VR）进行了研究，但在护理文献中，采用虚拟现实教学法教授护理本科生的益处和障碍的证据并不明确：方法：采用 PRISMA-ScR 报告指南对 6 个数据库进行范围界定。使用 Covidence® 软件管理数据。结果：17 篇文章确定了五个主题：结果：17 篇文章确定了 VR 的 5 个主题益处（知识获取、学生参与、提高自信心、教学策略和成本因素）和 4 个障碍（身体不适、学习效果挑战、融入课程的挑战和技术挑战）：VR 是一种有效的教学策略，可强化护理概念并培养能力。结论：虚拟现实技术是强化护理概念和培养能力的有效教学策略，但不能替代临床教育。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊