Examining early adherence measures as predictors of subsequent adherence in an intensive longitudinal study of individuals in mutual help groups: One day at a time

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.) Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1111/acer.15385
Matison W. McCool, Frank J. Schwebel, Matthew R. Pearson, J. Scott Tonigan
{"title":"Examining early adherence measures as predictors of subsequent adherence in an intensive longitudinal study of individuals in mutual help groups: One day at a time","authors":"Matison W. McCool,&nbsp;Frank J. Schwebel,&nbsp;Matthew R. Pearson,&nbsp;J. Scott Tonigan","doi":"10.1111/acer.15385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals with a substance use disorder complete ecological momentary assessments (EMA) at lower rates than community samples. Previous research in tobacco users indicates that early log-in counts to smoking cessation websites predicted subsequent smoking cessation website usage. We extended this line of research to examine individuals who are seeking to change their drinking behaviors through mutual support groups. We examined whether adherence in the first 7 days (1487 observations) of an intensive longitudinal study design could predict subsequent EMA protocol adherence (50% and 80% adherence separately) at 30 (5700 observations) and 60 days (10,750 observations).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 132) attending mutual-help groups for alcohol use completed two assessments per day for 6 months. We trained four classification models (logistic regression, recursive partitioning, support vector machines, and neural networks) using a training dataset (80% of the data) with each of the first 7 days' cumulative EMA assessment completion. We then tested these models to predict the remaining 20% of the data and evaluated model classification accuracy. We also used univariate receiver operating characteristic curves to examine the minimal combination of days and completion percentage to best predict subsequent adherence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Different modeling techniques can be used with early assessment completion as predictors to accurately classify individuals that will meet minimal and optimal adherence rates later in the study. Models ranged in their performance from poor to outstanding classification, with no single model clearly outperforming other models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Traditional and machine learning approaches can be used concurrently to examine several methods of predicting EMA adherence based on early assessment completion. Future studies could investigate the use of several algorithms in real time to help improve participant adherence rates by monitoring early adherence and using early assessment completion as features in predictive modeling.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Individuals with a substance use disorder complete ecological momentary assessments (EMA) at lower rates than community samples. Previous research in tobacco users indicates that early log-in counts to smoking cessation websites predicted subsequent smoking cessation website usage. We extended this line of research to examine individuals who are seeking to change their drinking behaviors through mutual support groups. We examined whether adherence in the first 7 days (1487 observations) of an intensive longitudinal study design could predict subsequent EMA protocol adherence (50% and 80% adherence separately) at 30 (5700 observations) and 60 days (10,750 observations).

Methods

Participants (n = 132) attending mutual-help groups for alcohol use completed two assessments per day for 6 months. We trained four classification models (logistic regression, recursive partitioning, support vector machines, and neural networks) using a training dataset (80% of the data) with each of the first 7 days' cumulative EMA assessment completion. We then tested these models to predict the remaining 20% of the data and evaluated model classification accuracy. We also used univariate receiver operating characteristic curves to examine the minimal combination of days and completion percentage to best predict subsequent adherence.

Results

Different modeling techniques can be used with early assessment completion as predictors to accurately classify individuals that will meet minimal and optimal adherence rates later in the study. Models ranged in their performance from poor to outstanding classification, with no single model clearly outperforming other models.

Conclusions

Traditional and machine learning approaches can be used concurrently to examine several methods of predicting EMA adherence based on early assessment completion. Future studies could investigate the use of several algorithms in real time to help improve participant adherence rates by monitoring early adherence and using early assessment completion as features in predictive modeling.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项针对互助小组成员的深入纵向研究中,研究早期坚持治疗的措施对后续坚持治疗的预测作用:一天一次
背景:药物使用障碍患者完成生态瞬间评估(EMA)的比率低于社区样本。以前对烟草使用者的研究表明,戒烟网站的早期登录次数可预测戒烟网站的后续使用情况。我们将这一研究思路延伸到了通过互助小组寻求改变饮酒行为的人身上。我们研究了强化纵向研究设计的前 7 天(1487 次观察)的依从性能否预测随后 30 天(5700 次观察)和 60 天(10750 次观察)的 EMA 方案依从性(分别为 50%和 80% 的依从性):参加酗酒互助小组的参与者(n = 132)在 6 个月内每天完成两次评估。我们使用训练数据集(80% 的数据)训练了四个分类模型(逻辑回归、递归分割、支持向量机和神经网络),每个模型都包含前 7 天累计 EMA 评估的完成情况。然后,我们对这些模型进行了测试,以预测剩余 20% 的数据,并评估了模型分类的准确性。我们还使用单变量接收者操作特征曲线来研究最能预测后续依从性的天数和完成百分比的最小组合:结果:不同的建模技术可用于早期评估完成情况的预测,以准确地对研究后期达到最低和最佳依从率的个体进行分类。模型的表现从较差到出色不等,没有一个模型明显优于其他模型:结论:传统方法和机器学习方法可同时用于研究根据早期评估完成情况预测 EMA 依从性的几种方法。未来的研究可以调查几种算法的实时使用情况,通过监测早期依从性并将早期评估完成情况作为预测模型的特征,帮助提高参与者的依从率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Articles of Public Interest Impaired or not impaired: The accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in detecting cognitive impairment among patients with alcohol use disorder. Alcohol habits and alcohol-related health conditions of self-defined lifetime abstainers and never binge drinkers. Alcohol hangovers as a predictor of the development of immune-related chronic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1