Evaluating PDC bit-rock interaction models to investigate torsional vibrations in geothermal drilling

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Geothermics Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103060
Ashutosh Sharma , Mohammed F. Al Dushaishi , Runar Nygaard
{"title":"Evaluating PDC bit-rock interaction models to investigate torsional vibrations in geothermal drilling","authors":"Ashutosh Sharma ,&nbsp;Mohammed F. Al Dushaishi ,&nbsp;Runar Nygaard","doi":"10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) bits are superior for drilling geothermal wells because of their superior drilling performance compared to conventional roller cone bits. However, the shear action of PDC bits generates detrimental vibrations during drilling. The main objective of this study was to establish a methodology to analyze and predict the stick-slip severity in hard rocks for geothermal wells. Two non-linear coupled axial-torsional bit-rock interaction (BRI) models are presented: one is based on a velocity-decaying friction model (VDF), and the other is based on a state-dependent delay friction model (SDDF). The capabilities of the two models were evaluated to assess the axial and torsional dynamic stabilities of drill stems in deep geothermal wells. The comparative analysis, along with the results from both models, were validated using geothermal well downhole data. Five distinct zones were selected for analysis, and the stick-slip severity value (SSV) was calculated using these two models (VDF and SDDF). The results from these two models for the five different zones were compared with the field data. The results indicated that VDF demonstrated superior quality when compared with field values, as the results of VDF were within the interquartile range of the observed SSV in each zone. A sensitivity analysis employing spider plots was performed for both models, considering parameters related to rock, bit, operational, and frictional aspects. In terms of the operational parameters, the weight-on-bit (WOB) and revolutions per minute (RPM) exerted the most significant influence on the SSV for both models. For the VDF model, the sensitivity analysis indicated that the frictional parameter, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), and number of cutters (NOC) had the most pronounced impact on the SSV. In the case of the SDDF, the Intrinsic specific energy (ISE), bit diameter, and number of blades (NOB) are the key factors that predominantly affect the SSV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55095,"journal":{"name":"Geothermics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geothermics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375650524001494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) bits are superior for drilling geothermal wells because of their superior drilling performance compared to conventional roller cone bits. However, the shear action of PDC bits generates detrimental vibrations during drilling. The main objective of this study was to establish a methodology to analyze and predict the stick-slip severity in hard rocks for geothermal wells. Two non-linear coupled axial-torsional bit-rock interaction (BRI) models are presented: one is based on a velocity-decaying friction model (VDF), and the other is based on a state-dependent delay friction model (SDDF). The capabilities of the two models were evaluated to assess the axial and torsional dynamic stabilities of drill stems in deep geothermal wells. The comparative analysis, along with the results from both models, were validated using geothermal well downhole data. Five distinct zones were selected for analysis, and the stick-slip severity value (SSV) was calculated using these two models (VDF and SDDF). The results from these two models for the five different zones were compared with the field data. The results indicated that VDF demonstrated superior quality when compared with field values, as the results of VDF were within the interquartile range of the observed SSV in each zone. A sensitivity analysis employing spider plots was performed for both models, considering parameters related to rock, bit, operational, and frictional aspects. In terms of the operational parameters, the weight-on-bit (WOB) and revolutions per minute (RPM) exerted the most significant influence on the SSV for both models. For the VDF model, the sensitivity analysis indicated that the frictional parameter, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), and number of cutters (NOC) had the most pronounced impact on the SSV. In the case of the SDDF, the Intrinsic specific energy (ISE), bit diameter, and number of blades (NOB) are the key factors that predominantly affect the SSV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 PDC 钻头与岩石相互作用模型,以研究地热钻探中的扭转振动
与传统的滚锥钻头相比,聚晶金刚石小型钻头(PDC)具有更优越的钻井性能,因此非常适合地热井钻探。然而,PDC 钻头的剪切作用会在钻井过程中产生有害振动。本研究的主要目的是建立一种方法来分析和预测地热井在硬岩层中的粘滑严重程度。研究提出了两个非线性耦合轴向-扭转钻头-岩石相互作用(BRI)模型:一个基于速度衰减摩擦模型(VDF),另一个基于状态相关延迟摩擦模型(SDDF)。对这两种模型的能力进行了评估,以评估深层地热井中钻杆的轴向和扭转动态稳定性。比较分析以及两个模型的结果均通过地热井井下数据进行了验证。选择了五个不同的区域进行分析,并使用这两种模型(VDF 和 SDDF)计算了粘滑严重程度值(SSV)。这两个模型对五个不同区域的计算结果与现场数据进行了比较。结果表明,与实地值相比,VDF 显示出更高的质量,因为 VDF 的结果都在各区观测到的 SSV 的四分位数范围内。考虑到与岩石、钻头、操作和摩擦力有关的参数,采用蜘蛛图对两种模型进行了敏感性分析。在操作参数方面,钻头重量(WOB)和每分钟转数(RPM)对两个模型的 SSV 影响最大。对于 VDF 模型,敏感性分析表明,摩擦参数、单轴抗压强度 (UCS) 和刀具数量 (NOC) 对 SSV 的影响最为明显。而在 SDDF 模型中,内在比能量 (ISE)、钻头直径和刀片数量 (NOB) 是主要影响 SSV 的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geothermics
Geothermics 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
237
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geothermics is an international journal devoted to the research and development of geothermal energy. The International Board of Editors of Geothermics, which comprises specialists in the various aspects of geothermal resources, exploration and development, guarantees the balanced, comprehensive view of scientific and technological developments in this promising energy field. It promulgates the state of the art and science of geothermal energy, its exploration and exploitation through a regular exchange of information from all parts of the world. The journal publishes articles dealing with the theory, exploration techniques and all aspects of the utilization of geothermal resources. Geothermics serves as the scientific house, or exchange medium, through which the growing community of geothermal specialists can provide and receive information.
期刊最新文献
Experimental assessment of inter-well reinjection in standing column wells by analysis of transfer functions obtained from non-stationary deconvolution The certainty matrix for fault data and interpretations Investigation of radiogenic heat production in granites of the Goiás Tin Province, Central Brazil Influence of ground source heat exchanger operation modes on multi-borehole mid-deep ground source heat pump system performance Deep thermal state on the southern margin of the Zhangzhou Basin based on the electrical conductivity model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1