Soybean overweight shock (SOS): The impact of trade liberalization in China on overweight prevalence

IF 5.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS 中国经济评论 Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102224
Rui Wang , Faqin Lin , Kuo Feng
{"title":"Soybean overweight shock (SOS): The impact of trade liberalization in China on overweight prevalence","authors":"Rui Wang ,&nbsp;Faqin Lin ,&nbsp;Kuo Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the overweight effect of the soybean import shock (referred to as the soybean overweight shock or “SOS”) on China, the largest importer of soybeans worldwide. By using China's soybean import liberalization in 1996 as a natural experiment, which involved the removal of soybean tariff rate quota (TRQ) policy and a reduction in soybean import tariffs from 114% to 3%, we found significant SOS effects. The soybean import shock can account for 10.76% of the observed increase in overweight probability between 1989 and 2006. Mechanism analysis finds that the exposure to the soybean import shock leads to a significant decrease in the market price of soybean oil and an increase in soybean oil consumption, it also increases the likelihood of being overweight through dining out, eating food prepared outside, and eating fried foods. Additionally, we discovered stronger SOS effects in urban residents, females and individuals with relatively lower family income.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001135","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the overweight effect of the soybean import shock (referred to as the soybean overweight shock or “SOS”) on China, the largest importer of soybeans worldwide. By using China's soybean import liberalization in 1996 as a natural experiment, which involved the removal of soybean tariff rate quota (TRQ) policy and a reduction in soybean import tariffs from 114% to 3%, we found significant SOS effects. The soybean import shock can account for 10.76% of the observed increase in overweight probability between 1989 and 2006. Mechanism analysis finds that the exposure to the soybean import shock leads to a significant decrease in the market price of soybean oil and an increase in soybean oil consumption, it also increases the likelihood of being overweight through dining out, eating food prepared outside, and eating fried foods. Additionally, we discovered stronger SOS effects in urban residents, females and individuals with relatively lower family income.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大豆超重冲击(SOS):中国贸易自由化对超重发生率的影响
本研究调查了大豆进口冲击(简称为 "大豆超重冲击 "或 "SOS")对全球最大的大豆进口国中国的超重效应。以 1996 年中国大豆进口自由化为自然实验,包括取消大豆关税配额(TRQ)政策和将大豆进口关税从 114% 降至 3%,我们发现了显著的 SOS 效应。大豆进口冲击可以解释 1989 年至 2006 年间观察到的超重概率增加的 10.76%。机制分析发现,大豆进口冲击导致大豆油市场价格显著下降,大豆油消费量增加,同时还通过外出就餐、食用外面准备的食物和食用油炸食品增加了超重的可能性。此外,我们还发现 SOS 对城市居民、女性和家庭收入相对较低的个人有更强的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
期刊最新文献
Did the anti-avoidance rules curtail the profit shifting of foreign multinationals in China? Intergenerational preference transmission in physician families during the pandemic: Theory and evidence How motivations and costs affect financial knowledge learning? Evidence from a large-scale FinTech experiment in China The long-term cognitive and schooling effects of childhood vaccinations in China Unveiling the shadows: School bullying and students' ability erosions in Chinese compulsory schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1