The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100
Chung Kwan Lo , Khe Foon Hew , Morris Siu-yung Jong
{"title":"The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda","authors":"Chung Kwan Lo ,&nbsp;Khe Foon Hew ,&nbsp;Morris Siu-yung Jong","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, has gained considerable attention as a transformative yet controversial tool for enhancing teaching and learning experiences. Several reviews and numerous articles have been written about harnessing ChatGPT in education since its release on November 30, 2022. Besides summarising its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) as identified in previous systematic reviews of ChatGPT research, this systematic review aims to develop a new understanding of its influence on student engagement by synthesising the existing related research using a three-dimensional framework comprising behavioural, emotional, and cognitive aspects. We searched relevant databases and included 72 empirical studies published within one year of ChatGPT's initial release. The findings reveal robust but narrowly focused evidence related to behavioural engagement (i.e., work with ChatGPT) and disengagement (i.e., academic dishonesty). The evidence related to the emotional aspect is mixed, with instances of both engagement (e.g., satisfaction and interest/fun) and disengagement (e.g., disappointment and worry/anxiety). There is broad but weak evidence regarding cognitive engagement (e.g., increased understanding and positive self-perception) and disengagement (e.g., reduced critical thinking and overreliance). Our review uncovers several under-explored indicators of student engagement, pointing to the need for further research. Specifically, future studies could focus on students' study habits and attendance (behavioural engagement), social interaction (emotional engagement), and self-regulation and critical thinking (cognitive engagement) in ChatGPT-supported learning environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 105100"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524001143/pdfft?md5=6b36c245ca2976a7bd74e9a258f26460&pid=1-s2.0-S0360131524001143-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524001143","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, has gained considerable attention as a transformative yet controversial tool for enhancing teaching and learning experiences. Several reviews and numerous articles have been written about harnessing ChatGPT in education since its release on November 30, 2022. Besides summarising its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) as identified in previous systematic reviews of ChatGPT research, this systematic review aims to develop a new understanding of its influence on student engagement by synthesising the existing related research using a three-dimensional framework comprising behavioural, emotional, and cognitive aspects. We searched relevant databases and included 72 empirical studies published within one year of ChatGPT's initial release. The findings reveal robust but narrowly focused evidence related to behavioural engagement (i.e., work with ChatGPT) and disengagement (i.e., academic dishonesty). The evidence related to the emotional aspect is mixed, with instances of both engagement (e.g., satisfaction and interest/fun) and disengagement (e.g., disappointment and worry/anxiety). There is broad but weak evidence regarding cognitive engagement (e.g., increased understanding and positive self-perception) and disengagement (e.g., reduced critical thinking and overreliance). Our review uncovers several under-explored indicators of student engagement, pointing to the need for further research. Specifically, future studies could focus on students' study habits and attendance (behavioural engagement), social interaction (emotional engagement), and self-regulation and critical thinking (cognitive engagement) in ChatGPT-supported learning environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT 对学生参与的影响:系统回顾与未来研究议程
ChatGPT 是一种最先进的人工智能(AI)聊天机器人,作为一种具有变革性但又备受争议的工具,它在增强教学体验方面获得了相当多的关注。自 ChatGPT 于 2022 年 11 月 30 日发布以来,有关在教育领域利用 ChatGPT 的评论和文章不胜枚举。除了总结以往 ChatGPT 研究系统性综述中发现的其优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT)之外,本系统性综述旨在通过使用一个包括行为、情感和认知方面的三维框架来综合现有的相关研究,从而对 ChatGPT 对学生参与度的影响有一个新的认识。我们搜索了相关数据库,收录了 ChatGPT 发布一年内发表的 72 项实证研究。研究结果显示了与行为参与(即使用 ChatGPT 工作)和脱离参与(即学术不诚实)相关的有力证据,但范围较窄。与情感方面有关的证据参差不齐,既有参与(如满意和兴趣/乐趣),也有脱离(如失望和担忧/焦虑)。关于认知参与(如增加理解和积极的自我认知)和脱离参与(如减少批判性思维和过度依赖),有广泛但薄弱的证据。我们的综述发现了几个未被充分探索的学生参与指标,这表明我们有必要开展进一步的研究。具体来说,未来的研究可以关注学生在 ChatGPT 支持的学习环境中的学习习惯和出勤率(行为参与)、社交互动(情感参与)以及自我调节和批判性思维(认知参与)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Personalization in educational gamification: Learners with different trait competitiveness benefit differently from rankings on leaderboards Reducing interpretative ambiguity in an educational environment with ChatGPT Editorial Board “Storytelling and educational robotics: A scoping review (2004–2024)” Advancing a Practical Inquiry Model with multi-perspective role-playing to foster critical thinking behavior in e-book reading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1