Differences in Perioperative Metrics by Race and Ethnicity and Insurance After Pelvic Fracture: A Nationwide Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20240605-03
Jeffrey Okewunmi, Brocha Z Stern, Juan Sebastian Arroyave Villada, Mateo Restrepo Mejia, Nicole Zubizarreta, Jashvant Poeran, David A Forsh
{"title":"Differences in Perioperative Metrics by Race and Ethnicity and Insurance After Pelvic Fracture: A Nationwide Study.","authors":"Jeffrey Okewunmi, Brocha Z Stern, Juan Sebastian Arroyave Villada, Mateo Restrepo Mejia, Nicole Zubizarreta, Jashvant Poeran, David A Forsh","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240605-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disparities in orthopedic trauma care have been reported for racial-ethnic minority and socially disadvantaged patients. We examined differences in perioperative metrics by patient race and ethnicity and insurance after pelvic fracture in a national sample in the United States.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample was queried for White, Black, and Hispanic patients 18 to 64 years old with private, Medicaid, or self-pay insurance who underwent non-elective pelvic fracture surgery. Associations between combined race and ethnicity and insurance subgroups and perioperative metrics (time to surgery, length of stay, inhospital complications, institutional discharge) were assessed using multivariable generalized linear and logistic regression models. Adjusted percent differences or odds ratios (ORs) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A weighted total of 14,375 surgeries were included (68.8% in White patients, 16.1% in Black patients, and 15.1% in Hispanic patients; 60.0% private insurance, 26.3% Medicaid, and 13.7% self-pay). Compared with White patients with private insurance, all Black insurance subgroups had longer length of stay (+15.38% to +38.78%, <i>P</i>≤.001), as did Hispanic patients with Medicaid (+28.03%, <i>P</i><.001), White patients with Medicaid (+13.08%, <i>P</i><.001), and White patients with self-pay (+9.47%, <i>P</i>=.04). Additionally, compared with White patients with private insurance, decreased odds of institutional discharge were observed for all patients with self-pay (OR, 0.24-0.37, <i>P</i><.001) as well as White patients with Medicaid (OR, 0.70, <i>P</i>=.003) and Hispanic patients with Medicaid (OR, 0.57, <i>P</i>=.002). There were no significant adjusted associations between race and ethnicity and insurance subgroups and in-hospital complications or time to surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These differences in perioperative metrics, primarily for Black patients and patients with self-pay insurance, warrant further examination to identify whether they reflect disparities that should be addressed to promote equitable orthopedic trauma care. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2024;47(5):e233-e240.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"e233-e240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240605-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disparities in orthopedic trauma care have been reported for racial-ethnic minority and socially disadvantaged patients. We examined differences in perioperative metrics by patient race and ethnicity and insurance after pelvic fracture in a national sample in the United States.

Materials and methods: The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample was queried for White, Black, and Hispanic patients 18 to 64 years old with private, Medicaid, or self-pay insurance who underwent non-elective pelvic fracture surgery. Associations between combined race and ethnicity and insurance subgroups and perioperative metrics (time to surgery, length of stay, inhospital complications, institutional discharge) were assessed using multivariable generalized linear and logistic regression models. Adjusted percent differences or odds ratios (ORs) were reported.

Results: A weighted total of 14,375 surgeries were included (68.8% in White patients, 16.1% in Black patients, and 15.1% in Hispanic patients; 60.0% private insurance, 26.3% Medicaid, and 13.7% self-pay). Compared with White patients with private insurance, all Black insurance subgroups had longer length of stay (+15.38% to +38.78%, P≤.001), as did Hispanic patients with Medicaid (+28.03%, P<.001), White patients with Medicaid (+13.08%, P<.001), and White patients with self-pay (+9.47%, P=.04). Additionally, compared with White patients with private insurance, decreased odds of institutional discharge were observed for all patients with self-pay (OR, 0.24-0.37, P<.001) as well as White patients with Medicaid (OR, 0.70, P=.003) and Hispanic patients with Medicaid (OR, 0.57, P=.002). There were no significant adjusted associations between race and ethnicity and insurance subgroups and in-hospital complications or time to surgery.

Conclusion: These differences in perioperative metrics, primarily for Black patients and patients with self-pay insurance, warrant further examination to identify whether they reflect disparities that should be addressed to promote equitable orthopedic trauma care. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(5):e233-e240.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨盆骨折后不同种族、族裔和保险在围手术期指标上的差异:一项全国性研究。
背景:据报道,少数种族和社会弱势群体患者在创伤骨科护理方面存在差异。我们研究了美国全国样本中骨盆骨折后不同种族、族裔和保险患者围手术期指标的差异:对 2016-2019 年全国住院病人样本中 18 至 64 岁、有私人、医疗补助或自费保险、接受非选择性骨盆骨折手术的白人、黑人和西班牙裔病人进行了查询。使用多变量广义线性回归模型和逻辑回归模型评估了种族、民族和保险亚群与围手术期指标(手术时间、住院时间、院内并发症、出院情况)之间的关系。结果:共纳入了 14,375 例加权手术(白人患者占 68.8%,黑人患者占 16.1%,西班牙裔患者占 15.1%;私人保险占 60.0%,医疗补助占 26.3%,自费占 13.7%)。与有私人保险的白人患者相比,所有黑人保险亚组的住院时间都更长(+15.38% 到 +38.78%,P≤.001),有医疗补助的西班牙裔患者也是如此(+28.03%,PPP=.04)。此外,与有私人保险的白人患者相比,所有自费患者(OR,0.24-0.37,PP=.003)和有医疗补助的西班牙裔患者(OR,0.57,P=.002)出院的几率都有所下降。经调整后,种族、民族和保险亚群与院内并发症或手术时间之间无明显关联:这些围手术期指标的差异,主要是黑人患者和自费保险患者的差异,值得进一步研究,以确定它们是否反映了为促进创伤骨科护理的公平性而应解决的差异问题。[骨科。202x;4x(x):xx-xx]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of the Complication Reports of Expandable Lumbar Interbody Cages in the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database. An Eponymous History of Hemostatic, Tissue, and Reduction Clamps in Orthopedic Surgery. Evaluating the References of Insurance Policies for Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared With the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline. The Relationship Between Surgeon Volume and Major Surgical Complications After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Evaluation of 3177 US Orthopedic Surgeons. Trends in Location of Death for Individuals With Primary Bone Tumors in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1