Pub Date : 2024-08-19DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20240809-01
Anthony N Baumann, Andrew Fiorentino, Katelyn Sidloski, Hannah A Lee, Albert T Anastasio, Kempland C Walley, John D Kelly
Background: The recent addition of biceps tendon augmentation to partial arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for the treatment of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears is proposed to improve clinical outcomes and reduce re-tears.
Materials and methods: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis (5 studies) was to compare outcomes between partial ARCR with (142 patients) and without (149 patients) biceps augmentation.
Results: Partial ARCR with and without biceps augmentation were comparable in pain, function, and range of motion. However, biceps augmentation vs no augmentation at all during ARCR may lower re-tear rates for irreparable large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (42.9% vs 72.5%, P=.007).
Conclusion: More research is needed to investigate this technique and guide surgical decision-making. [Orthopedics. 20XX;4X(X):XXXXXX.].
背景:最近,在关节镜下肩袖部分修复术(ARCR)中增加了肱二头肌肌腱增强术,用于治疗大到重度肩袖撕裂,以改善临床疗效并减少再次撕裂:本系统综述和荟萃分析(5 项研究)的目的是比较有(142 名患者)和无(149 名患者)肱二头肌增强术的部分 ARCR 的疗效:结果:在疼痛、功能和活动范围方面,进行和未进行肱二头肌增强手术的部分 ARCR 具有可比性。然而,在ARCR过程中进行肱二头肌增强与不进行肱二头肌增强可能会降低不可修复的肩袖大面积撕裂的再撕裂率(42.9% vs 72.5%,P=.007):结论:需要更多的研究来探讨这一技术并指导手术决策。[Orthopedics.20XX;4X(X):XXXXX.].
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes and Re-Tear Rates for Partial Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With or Without Biceps Augmentation for Large-to-Massive Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Anthony N Baumann, Andrew Fiorentino, Katelyn Sidloski, Hannah A Lee, Albert T Anastasio, Kempland C Walley, John D Kelly","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240809-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240809-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent addition of biceps tendon augmentation to partial arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for the treatment of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears is proposed to improve clinical outcomes and reduce re-tears.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis (5 studies) was to compare outcomes between partial ARCR with (142 patients) and without (149 patients) biceps augmentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Partial ARCR with and without biceps augmentation were comparable in pain, function, and range of motion. However, biceps augmentation vs no augmentation at all during ARCR may lower re-tear rates for irreparable large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (42.9% vs 72.5%, <i>P</i>=.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More research is needed to investigate this technique and guide surgical decision-making. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 20XX;4X(X):XXXXXX.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-19DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20240809-02
Tanner Campbell, Mateo Kirwan, Vafa Behzadpour, Tanner Langvardt, Johnathan Dallman, Yanjie Huang, Renan C Castillo, Nathan N O'Hara, Robert V O'Toole, Brent Wise
Background: The purpose of this study was to externally validate a predictive score for fracture-related infections, establishing generalizability for absolute and relative risk of infection in the setting of orthopedic fracture surgery.
Materials and methods: This was a retrospective, case-control study performed at a level I academic trauma center that included 147 patients with fracture-related infection in the study group and 300 control patients. We analyzed the same 8 independent predictors of fracture-related infection cited by a previous study. We then used the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) to compare the derivation and validation cohorts. The validation and derivation cohorts were then compared by grouping patients into 4 strata of Wise score groups. This allowed for comparison of AUC and risk of fracture-related infection in our institution with those in the previously studied institution.
Results: The resulting data yielded an AUC (0.74) nearly identical to that of the previously studied institution. It was also found that the relative risk of infection correlated with the Wise score in the same way the initial model did with the absolute risks being similar.
Conclusion: The previous predictive model was externally validated and shown to be generalizable to a different patient population. The relative risk of a fracture-related infection can be determined using this scoring model preoperatively with the goal of aiding in patient counseling and surgical decision-making, giving a quantitative value to patient risk factors. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].
{"title":"External Validation of a Predictive Score for Fracture-Related Infections in Orthopedic Trauma Surgery.","authors":"Tanner Campbell, Mateo Kirwan, Vafa Behzadpour, Tanner Langvardt, Johnathan Dallman, Yanjie Huang, Renan C Castillo, Nathan N O'Hara, Robert V O'Toole, Brent Wise","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240809-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240809-02","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to externally validate a predictive score for fracture-related infections, establishing generalizability for absolute and relative risk of infection in the setting of orthopedic fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, case-control study performed at a level I academic trauma center that included 147 patients with fracture-related infection in the study group and 300 control patients. We analyzed the same 8 independent predictors of fracture-related infection cited by a previous study. We then used the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) to compare the derivation and validation cohorts. The validation and derivation cohorts were then compared by grouping patients into 4 strata of Wise score groups. This allowed for comparison of AUC and risk of fracture-related infection in our institution with those in the previously studied institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting data yielded an AUC (0.74) nearly identical to that of the previously studied institution. It was also found that the relative risk of infection correlated with the Wise score in the same way the initial model did with the absolute risks being similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The previous predictive model was externally validated and shown to be generalizable to a different patient population. The relative risk of a fracture-related infection can be determined using this scoring model preoperatively with the goal of aiding in patient counseling and surgical decision-making, giving a quantitative value to patient risk factors. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-19DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20240809-06
Rex W Lutz, Danielle Ponzio, Stephanie A Kwan, Hope S Thalody, Quincy Cheesman, Harrison A Patrizio, Alvin C Ong, Gregory K Deirmengian
Background: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a serious concern for orthopedic surgeons. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) sets the safe exposure limit at 85 dB for 8 hours, yet operating rooms often surpass this limit. This study investigated if using an automated broaching system exposes orthopedic surgeons to dangerous decibel (dB) levels.
Materials and methods: A prospective study analyzed 138 intraoperative sound recordings from 92 total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgeries and 46 baseline measurements at an academic-affiliated private practice, using the NIOSH Sound Level Meter (SLM) application and a microphone. The surgeries were categorized into manual and automated broaching. Key metrics measured included maximal dB level (MDL), peak sound pressure (LCpeak), average continuous sound (LAeq), and average weighted sound in an 8-hour period (TWA), along with dose representations, to identify hazardous noise levels.
Results: Of the 92 THA sound recordings, 50 used manual broaching and 42 employed automated broaching. Automated broaching exhibited higher noise levels, with an average MDL of 109.92 dBA, a LAeq of 86.09 dBA, a TWA of 76.48 dBA, and a projected noise dose of 137.74%. In contrast, manual broaching exhibited an average MDL of 105.87 dBA, a LAeq of 83.06 dBA, a TWA of 72.82 dBA, and a projected noise dose of 82.02%.
Conclusion: This study highlights the auditory risks from automated broach and manual THA surgeries that orthopedic surgeons experience. Manufacturers should focus on reducing instrument noise when designing surgical tools and orthopedic surgeons and operating room staff should take measures to protect themselves from NIHL during surgery. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].
{"title":"Surgeons Who Perform Total Hip Arthroplasty Are at Risk for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, Especially When Using Automated Broaching.","authors":"Rex W Lutz, Danielle Ponzio, Stephanie A Kwan, Hope S Thalody, Quincy Cheesman, Harrison A Patrizio, Alvin C Ong, Gregory K Deirmengian","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240809-06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240809-06","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a serious concern for orthopedic surgeons. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) sets the safe exposure limit at 85 dB for 8 hours, yet operating rooms often surpass this limit. This study investigated if using an automated broaching system exposes orthopedic surgeons to dangerous decibel (dB) levels.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective study analyzed 138 intraoperative sound recordings from 92 total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgeries and 46 baseline measurements at an academic-affiliated private practice, using the NIOSH Sound Level Meter (SLM) application and a microphone. The surgeries were categorized into manual and automated broaching. Key metrics measured included maximal dB level (MDL), peak sound pressure (LC<sub>peak</sub>), average continuous sound (LA<sub>eq</sub>), and average weighted sound in an 8-hour period (TWA), along with dose representations, to identify hazardous noise levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 92 THA sound recordings, 50 used manual broaching and 42 employed automated broaching. Automated broaching exhibited higher noise levels, with an average MDL of 109.92 dBA, a LA<sub>eq</sub> of 86.09 dBA, a TWA of 76.48 dBA, and a projected noise dose of 137.74%. In contrast, manual broaching exhibited an average MDL of 105.87 dBA, a LA<sub>eq</sub> of 83.06 dBA, a TWA of 72.82 dBA, and a projected noise dose of 82.02%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the auditory risks from automated broach and manual THA surgeries that orthopedic surgeons experience. Manufacturers should focus on reducing instrument noise when designing surgical tools and orthopedic surgeons and operating room staff should take measures to protect themselves from NIHL during surgery. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-19DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20240809-03
Muhammad Talal Ibrahim, Hamza Imran, Muhammad Hamza Shuja, Haider Sheraz, Andrew Howard, Shahryar Noordin
Background: Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) captures online attention received by a research article in addition to traditional bibliometrics. We present a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of high AAS articles and identify predictors of AAS in orthopedics.
Materials and methods: The top 30 articles with highest AAS were selected from orthopedic journals using the Dimensions App. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to address clustering in articles from the same journal, with journals as the leveling variable.
Results: A total of 750 articles from 25 journals were included. In the final multivariable model, the funding source (none, industry, government, foundation, university, or multiple), findings (positive, negative, neutral, or not applicable), and the journal's impact factor were significant at P<.05.
Conclusion: Predictors of AAS are similar to predictors of traditional bibliometrics. Future studies need prospective dynamic data to further elucidate the AAS. [Orthopedics. 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].
{"title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Predictors of Altmetric Attention Scores in Orthopedic Research: Investigating Online Visibility.","authors":"Muhammad Talal Ibrahim, Hamza Imran, Muhammad Hamza Shuja, Haider Sheraz, Andrew Howard, Shahryar Noordin","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240809-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240809-03","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) captures online attention received by a research article in addition to traditional bibliometrics. We present a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of high AAS articles and identify predictors of AAS in orthopedics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The top 30 articles with highest AAS were selected from orthopedic journals using the Dimensions App. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to address clustering in articles from the same journal, with journals as the leveling variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 750 articles from 25 journals were included. In the final multivariable model, the funding source (none, industry, government, foundation, university, or multiple), findings (positive, negative, neutral, or not applicable), and the journal's impact factor were significant at <i>P</i><.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predictors of AAS are similar to predictors of traditional bibliometrics. Future studies need prospective dynamic data to further elucidate the AAS. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-19DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20240809-05
Justin Leal, Niall H Cochrane, Billy I Kim, Christopher T Holland, Rhett Hallows, Thorsten Seyler
Background: This study compared perioperative outcomes as well as encounter and 90-day costs between patients undergoing traditional vs robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA).
Materials and methods: A total of 430 TKAs (215 rTKAs, 215 traditional) were retrospectively reviewed. All rTKAs were performed with an imageless, second-generation robotic system. Cohorts were propensity score matched by age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Perioperative data and 90-day complications were subsequently compared. Cox regression analyses evaluated survival to all-cause revisions. Univariable analyses compared total cost of care for the initial encounter and 90-day postoperative period. Multivariable regression analyses were then performed to evaluate associations with increased encounter and 90-day costs.
Results: Patients undergoing rTKA had a higher incidence of discharge home (86.5% vs 60.0%; P<.001). The rTKA cohort trended toward a lower incidence of 90-day emergency department visits, and there was a significantly lower percentage of 90-day readmissions (4.2% vs 13.5%; P=.001). Cox hazard ratio demonstrated no difference in survival to all-cause revisions (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.5-3.7; P=.64). The cost of surgery was significantly higher in the rTKA cohort ($9292 vs $8392; P<.001); however, there was no difference in cost of encounter ($10,356.86 vs $10,396.44; P=.110) or at 90 days postoperatively ($11,103.89 vs $11,040.13; P=.739). rTKA did not have a significant association with increased cost at 90 days postoperatively (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90-1.02; P=.180).
Conclusion: rTKA had a higher intraoperative cost compared with traditional TKA. However, with increased home discharges and fewer 90-day readmissions, rTKA was not associated with increased cost at 90 days. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].
背景:本研究比较了接受传统与机器人全膝关节置换术(rTKA)的患者的围手术期结果以及就诊和 90 天费用:本研究比较了接受传统与机器人全膝关节置换术(rTKA)患者的围手术期结果以及就诊和90天费用:该研究回顾性分析了 430 例全膝关节置换术(215 例机器人全膝关节置换术,215 例传统全膝关节置换术)。所有rTKAs均使用无图像第二代机器人系统进行。按照年龄、性别、体重指数和美国麻醉医师协会评分进行倾向评分匹配。随后对围手术期数据和 90 天并发症进行了比较。Cox 回归分析评估了全因改期的存活率。单变量分析比较了初次就诊和术后 90 天的总护理成本。然后进行多变量回归分析,以评估首次就诊和术后90天费用增加的相关性:结果:接受 rTKA 的患者出院回家的比例更高(86.5% vs 60.0%;PP=.001)。Cox危险比显示,全因复发的生存率没有差异(危险比,1.3;95% CI,0.5-3.7;P=.64)。rTKA队列的手术费用明显更高(9292美元 vs 8392美元;PP=.110),术后90天的费用也更高(11103.89美元 vs 11040.13美元;P=.739)。rTKA与术后90天的费用增加无明显关联(几率比0.96;95% CI,0.90-1.02;P=.180)。结论:与传统 TKA 相比,rTKA 的术中费用更高,但随着出院回家次数的增加和 90 天再入院次数的减少,rTKA 与 90 天费用的增加无关。[骨科。202x;4x(x):xx-xx]。
{"title":"A Cost Analysis of Traditional Versus Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed With an Imageless, Second-generation Robotic System.","authors":"Justin Leal, Niall H Cochrane, Billy I Kim, Christopher T Holland, Rhett Hallows, Thorsten Seyler","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240809-05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240809-05","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared perioperative outcomes as well as encounter and 90-day costs between patients undergoing traditional vs robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 430 TKAs (215 rTKAs, 215 traditional) were retrospectively reviewed. All rTKAs were performed with an imageless, second-generation robotic system. Cohorts were propensity score matched by age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Perioperative data and 90-day complications were subsequently compared. Cox regression analyses evaluated survival to all-cause revisions. Univariable analyses compared total cost of care for the initial encounter and 90-day postoperative period. Multivariable regression analyses were then performed to evaluate associations with increased encounter and 90-day costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients undergoing rTKA had a higher incidence of discharge home (86.5% vs 60.0%; <i>P</i><.001). The rTKA cohort trended toward a lower incidence of 90-day emergency department visits, and there was a significantly lower percentage of 90-day readmissions (4.2% vs 13.5%; <i>P</i>=.001). Cox hazard ratio demonstrated no difference in survival to all-cause revisions (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.5-3.7; <i>P</i>=.64). The cost of surgery was significantly higher in the rTKA cohort ($9292 vs $8392; <i>P</i><.001); however, there was no difference in cost of encounter ($10,356.86 vs $10,396.44; <i>P</i>=.110) or at 90 days postoperatively ($11,103.89 vs $11,040.13; <i>P</i>=.739). rTKA did not have a significant association with increased cost at 90 days postoperatively (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90-1.02; <i>P</i>=.180).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rTKA had a higher intraoperative cost compared with traditional TKA. However, with increased home discharges and fewer 90-day readmissions, rTKA was not associated with increased cost at 90 days. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-19DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20240809-14
Brandi Krieg, Michael Dayton, Nicholas Alfonso
Extensor mechanism (EM) disruption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is devastating, especially in cases of re-rupture. A 67-year-old man with diabetes had patellar tendon rupture after revision TKA and then had migration of the bone block after Achilles tendon allograft with bone block (ATBB) augmentation with cerclage. A third reconstruction was performed with open reduction and internal fixation and high-strength braided suture augmentation. Five months postoperatively, the patient had regained full range of motion with intact EM and hardware. The risk of re-rupture is high in ATBB, and the primary issues in this case were nonunion and tendinous compromise. A construct that encompasses compression and buttressing of the bone block with tendon augmentation potentially addresses the risks of recurrent EM rupture in more complex cases. [Orthopedics. 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].
{"title":"Re-revision Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction Because of Nonunion and Tendon Failure After Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Brandi Krieg, Michael Dayton, Nicholas Alfonso","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240809-14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240809-14","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensor mechanism (EM) disruption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is devastating, especially in cases of re-rupture. A 67-year-old man with diabetes had patellar tendon rupture after revision TKA and then had migration of the bone block after Achilles tendon allograft with bone block (ATBB) augmentation with cerclage. A third reconstruction was performed with open reduction and internal fixation and high-strength braided suture augmentation. Five months postoperatively, the patient had regained full range of motion with intact EM and hardware. The risk of re-rupture is high in ATBB, and the primary issues in this case were nonunion and tendinous compromise. A construct that encompasses compression and buttressing of the bone block with tendon augmentation potentially addresses the risks of recurrent EM rupture in more complex cases. [<i>Orthopedics.</i> 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-19DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20240809-04
MaKenzie M Chambers, Caroline T Gutowski, Pietro Gentile, Krystal Hunter, Tae Won B Kim, Christina J Gutowski
Background: We conducted a study to investigate the relationship between a mental health diagnosis (MHD) and postoperative outcomes in orthopedic patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. We hypothesized that patients with sarcoma with a preoperative MHD would have worse outcomes and more postoperative complications.
Materials and methods: A retrospective review was performed of 356 patients who underwent surgical treatment for bone or soft tissue sarcoma. Patients were divided into two groups: those with a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and/or schizophrenia and those with no previous MHD. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-square tests.
Results: Statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences between the MHD group and the control group in three outcomes: length of stay, 90-day readmission rate, and incidence of surgical site infections. Subgroup analysis of the MHD group yielded significantly higher 90-day readmission rates for patients who were diagnosed during sarcoma treatment.
Conclusion: Patients with sarcoma and an MHD had a longer postoperative hospital stay, an increased 90-day readmission rate, and a greater risk of surgical site infection. Given the rising prevalence of mental health disorders nationwide, orthopedic surgeons should be aware of differences in postoperative outcomes between patients with sarcoma with and without mental illness. [Orthopedics. 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].
背景:我们开展了一项研究,旨在调查心理健康诊断(MHD)与骨和软组织肉瘤骨科患者术后预后之间的关系。我们假设,术前患有精神健康诊断的肉瘤患者的预后会更差,术后并发症会更多:我们对 356 名接受手术治疗的骨或软组织肉瘤患者进行了回顾性研究。患者被分为两组:诊断患有抑郁症、焦虑症、躁郁症和/或精神分裂症的患者和既往未患过MHD的患者。统计分析采用独立 t 检验、曼-惠特尼 U 检验和卡方检验:统计分析表明,在住院时间、90 天再入院率和手术部位感染发生率这三项结果上,MHD 组与对照组存在明显差异。对MHD组进行分组分析后发现,在肉瘤治疗期间确诊的患者90天再入院率明显更高:结论:患有肉瘤且患有精神疾病的患者术后住院时间更长,90 天再入院率更高,手术部位感染的风险更大。鉴于全国范围内精神疾病的发病率不断上升,骨科医生应注意患有和未患有精神疾病的肉瘤患者在术后结果上的差异。[Orthopedics.20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.]。
{"title":"Mental Health Disorders and Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma.","authors":"MaKenzie M Chambers, Caroline T Gutowski, Pietro Gentile, Krystal Hunter, Tae Won B Kim, Christina J Gutowski","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240809-04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240809-04","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a study to investigate the relationship between a mental health diagnosis (MHD) and postoperative outcomes in orthopedic patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. We hypothesized that patients with sarcoma with a preoperative MHD would have worse outcomes and more postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed of 356 patients who underwent surgical treatment for bone or soft tissue sarcoma. Patients were divided into two groups: those with a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and/or schizophrenia and those with no previous MHD. Statistical analysis was performed using independent <i>t</i>, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>, and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences between the MHD group and the control group in three outcomes: length of stay, 90-day readmission rate, and incidence of surgical site infections. Subgroup analysis of the MHD group yielded significantly higher 90-day readmission rates for patients who were diagnosed during sarcoma treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with sarcoma and an MHD had a longer postoperative hospital stay, an increased 90-day readmission rate, and a greater risk of surgical site infection. Given the rising prevalence of mental health disorders nationwide, orthopedic surgeons should be aware of differences in postoperative outcomes between patients with sarcoma with and without mental illness. [<i>Orthopedics.</i> 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-10DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20240702-03
Thompson Zhuang, Bill Young, Jessica Hooper, Derek F Amanatullah, Lauren Shapiro, Robin N Kamal
Background: In this study, we tested the null hypothesis that robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) vs conventional THA was not associated with (1) the amount of postoperative opioid use and (2) the incidence of new, persistent opioid use.
Materials and methods: We used a large, national administrative database to identify patients 50 years and older undergoing primary robotic or conventional THA. Patients with hip fractures or a history of malignancy, hip infection, or opioid use disorder were excluded. Patients who filled an opioid prescription within 1 year to 30 days preoperatively or who underwent a subsequent procedure within 1 year after THA were excluded. Outcomes included the morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) filled within the THA perioperative period and the incidence of new, persistent opioid use. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between robotic-assisted THA and new, persistent opioid use, adjusting for age, sex, insurance plan, region, location of surgery, and comorbidities.
Results: In the postoperative period, robotic-assisted THA, compared with conventional THA, was associated with a lower mean total MMEs filled per patient (452.2 vs 517.1; P<.001) and a lower mean MMEs per patient per day (71.53 vs 74.64; P<.001). Patients undergoing robotic-assisted THA had decreased odds of developing new, persistent opioid use compared with patients undergoing conventional THA (adjusted odds ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74-0.90]).
Conclusion: Robotic-assisted THA is associated with lower postoperative opioid use and a decreased odds of developing new, persistent opioid use compared with conventional THA. For the purposes of reducing opioid use, our results support the adoption of robotic-assisted THA. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].
{"title":"Opioid Use After Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty:A National Database Analysis.","authors":"Thompson Zhuang, Bill Young, Jessica Hooper, Derek F Amanatullah, Lauren Shapiro, Robin N Kamal","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240702-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240702-03","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we tested the null hypothesis that robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) vs conventional THA was not associated with (1) the amount of postoperative opioid use and (2) the incidence of new, persistent opioid use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used a large, national administrative database to identify patients 50 years and older undergoing primary robotic or conventional THA. Patients with hip fractures or a history of malignancy, hip infection, or opioid use disorder were excluded. Patients who filled an opioid prescription within 1 year to 30 days preoperatively or who underwent a subsequent procedure within 1 year after THA were excluded. Outcomes included the morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) filled within the THA perioperative period and the incidence of new, persistent opioid use. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between robotic-assisted THA and new, persistent opioid use, adjusting for age, sex, insurance plan, region, location of surgery, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the postoperative period, robotic-assisted THA, compared with conventional THA, was associated with a lower mean total MMEs filled per patient (452.2 vs 517.1; <i>P</i><.001) and a lower mean MMEs per patient per day (71.53 vs 74.64; <i>P</i><.001). Patients undergoing robotic-assisted THA had decreased odds of developing new, persistent opioid use compared with patients undergoing conventional THA (adjusted odds ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74-0.90]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted THA is associated with lower postoperative opioid use and a decreased odds of developing new, persistent opioid use compared with conventional THA. For the purposes of reducing opioid use, our results support the adoption of robotic-assisted THA. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141559441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-10DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20240702-02
Sheldon A McCown, Paul J Weatherby, Randal P Morris, Vinod K Panchbhavi, John C Hagedorn, William M Weiss, Jie Chen
Background: Displaced diaphyseal fractures can be reduced using the push-pull technique, wherein a plate is affixed to the distal fragment of the fracture, a post screw is placed proximal to the plate, and a lamina spreader creates distraction. This study evaluated the load to failure and mechanism of failure of bicortical and unicortical post screws during reduction.
Materials and methods: Four matched pairs of cadaver legs were subjected to a 2-cm oblique osteotomy simulating a displaced, oblique diaphyseal fracture. A 6-hole compression plate was affixed to the distal fragment with 2 unicortical locking screws, and a 12-mm uni-cortical or 20-mm bicortical screw was inserted as a post screw proximal to the plate. A lamina bone spreader was used to exert a distraction force between the plate and the post screw. A mechanical actuator simulated the distraction procedure until failure. Maximum applied load, displacement, and absorbed energy were recorded and compared across unicortical and bicortical groups by paired t tests.
Results: At maximum load, we found statistically significant differences in displacement (P=.003) and energy absorbed (P=.022) between the two groups. All unicortical screws failed through screw toggle and bone cut-out. Bicortical screws failed through bending, with no visible damage to the bone at the screw site.
Conclusion: When diaphyseal fractures are significantly shortened and require a greater distraction force to achieve reduction, bicortical screws demonstrate a higher mechanical load to failure and increased bone loss from the screw-removal site. A unicortical post screw may be used if minimal distraction is needed. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].
{"title":"Preventing Iatrogenic Fibula Fractures Using the Push-Pull Technique: A Biomechanical Comparison of Unicortical Versus Bicortical Post Screws.","authors":"Sheldon A McCown, Paul J Weatherby, Randal P Morris, Vinod K Panchbhavi, John C Hagedorn, William M Weiss, Jie Chen","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240702-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240702-02","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Displaced diaphyseal fractures can be reduced using the push-pull technique, wherein a plate is affixed to the distal fragment of the fracture, a post screw is placed proximal to the plate, and a lamina spreader creates distraction. This study evaluated the load to failure and mechanism of failure of bicortical and unicortical post screws during reduction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four matched pairs of cadaver legs were subjected to a 2-cm oblique osteotomy simulating a displaced, oblique diaphyseal fracture. A 6-hole compression plate was affixed to the distal fragment with 2 unicortical locking screws, and a 12-mm uni-cortical or 20-mm bicortical screw was inserted as a post screw proximal to the plate. A lamina bone spreader was used to exert a distraction force between the plate and the post screw. A mechanical actuator simulated the distraction procedure until failure. Maximum applied load, displacement, and absorbed energy were recorded and compared across unicortical and bicortical groups by paired <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At maximum load, we found statistically significant differences in displacement (<i>P</i>=.003) and energy absorbed (<i>P</i>=.022) between the two groups. All unicortical screws failed through screw toggle and bone cut-out. Bicortical screws failed through bending, with no visible damage to the bone at the screw site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When diaphyseal fractures are significantly shortened and require a greater distraction force to achieve reduction, bicortical screws demonstrate a higher mechanical load to failure and increased bone loss from the screw-removal site. A unicortical post screw may be used if minimal distraction is needed. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141559442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-10DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20240702-01
Casey Cardillo, Conor Garry, Jonathan L Katzman, Morteza Meftah, Joshua C Rozell, Ran Schwarzkopf, Claudette Lajam
Background: Optimizing operating room (OR) scheduling accuracy is important for improving OR efficiency and maximizing value of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, data on factors that may impact TKA OR scheduling accuracy are limited.
Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 7655 knee arthroplasties (6999 primary TKAs and 656 revision TKAs) performed between January 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patient baseline characteristics, surgeon experience (years in practice), as well as actual vs scheduled OR times were collected. Actual OR times that were at least 15% shorter or longer than scheduled OR times were considered to be clinically important. Logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the influence of specific patient and surgeon factors on OR scheduling inaccuracies.
Results: Using adjusted odds ratio, patients with primary TKA who had a lower body mass index (P<.001) were independently associated with overestimation of scheduled surgical time. Conversely, younger age (P<.001), afternoon procedure start time (P<.001), surgeons with less than 10 years of experience (P=.037), and higher patient body mass index (P<.001) were associated with underestimation of scheduled surgical time. For revision TKA, female sex (P=.021) and morning procedure start time (P=.038) were associated with overestimation of scheduled surgical time, while surgeons with less than 10 years of experience (P=.014) and patients who underwent spinal/epidural/block anesthesia (P=.038) were associated with underestimation of scheduled surgical time.
Conclusion: This study highlights patient, surgeon, and intraoperative variables that impact the accuracy of scheduling for TKA procedures. Health systems should take these variables into consideration when creating OR schedules to fully optimize resources and available space. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].
{"title":"Factors Affecting Operating Room Scheduling Accuracy for Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Casey Cardillo, Conor Garry, Jonathan L Katzman, Morteza Meftah, Joshua C Rozell, Ran Schwarzkopf, Claudette Lajam","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240702-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240702-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimizing operating room (OR) scheduling accuracy is important for improving OR efficiency and maximizing value of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, data on factors that may impact TKA OR scheduling accuracy are limited.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 7655 knee arthroplasties (6999 primary TKAs and 656 revision TKAs) performed between January 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patient baseline characteristics, surgeon experience (years in practice), as well as actual vs scheduled OR times were collected. Actual OR times that were at least 15% shorter or longer than scheduled OR times were considered to be clinically important. Logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the influence of specific patient and surgeon factors on OR scheduling inaccuracies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using adjusted odds ratio, patients with primary TKA who had a lower body mass index (<i>P</i><.001) were independently associated with overestimation of scheduled surgical time. Conversely, younger age (<i>P</i><.001), afternoon procedure start time (<i>P</i><.001), surgeons with less than 10 years of experience (<i>P</i>=.037), and higher patient body mass index (<i>P</i><.001) were associated with underestimation of scheduled surgical time. For revision TKA, female sex (<i>P</i>=.021) and morning procedure start time (<i>P</i>=.038) were associated with overestimation of scheduled surgical time, while surgeons with less than 10 years of experience (<i>P</i>=.014) and patients who underwent spinal/epidural/block anesthesia (<i>P</i>=.038) were associated with underestimation of scheduled surgical time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights patient, surgeon, and intraoperative variables that impact the accuracy of scheduling for TKA procedures. Health systems should take these variables into consideration when creating OR schedules to fully optimize resources and available space. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141559440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}