Point estimation of the 100p percent lethal dose using a novel penalised likelihood approach.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Statistical Methods in Medical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1177/09622802241259174
Yilei Ma, Youpeng Su, Peng Wang, Ping Yin
{"title":"Point estimation of the 100<i>p</i> percent lethal dose using a novel penalised likelihood approach.","authors":"Yilei Ma, Youpeng Su, Peng Wang, Ping Yin","doi":"10.1177/09622802241259174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Estimation of the 100<i>p</i> percent lethal dose (<math><msub><mtext>LD</mtext><mrow><mn>100</mn><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math>) is of great interest to pharmacologists for assessing the toxicity of certain compounds. However, most existing literature focuses on the interval estimation of <math><msub><mtext>LD</mtext><mrow><mn>100</mn><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math> and little attention has been paid to its point estimation. Currently, the most commonly used method for estimating the <math><msub><mtext>LD</mtext><mrow><mn>100</mn><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math> is the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), which can be represented as a ratio estimator, with the denominator being the slope estimated from the logistic regression model. However, the MLE can be seriously biased when the sample size is small, a common nature in such studies, or when the dose-response curve is relatively flat (i.e. the slope approaches zero). In this study, we address these issues by developing a novel penalised maximum likelihood estimator (PMLE) that can prevent the denominator of the ratio from being close to zero. Similar to the MLE, the PMLE is computationally simple and thus can be conveniently used in practice. Moreover, with a suitable penalty parameter, we show that the PMLE can (a) reduce the bias to the second order with respect to the sample size and (b) avoid extreme estimates. Through simulation studies and real data applications, we show that the PMLE generally outperforms the existing methods in terms of bias and root mean square error.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1331-1341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241259174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimation of the 100p percent lethal dose (LD100p) is of great interest to pharmacologists for assessing the toxicity of certain compounds. However, most existing literature focuses on the interval estimation of LD100p and little attention has been paid to its point estimation. Currently, the most commonly used method for estimating the LD100p is the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), which can be represented as a ratio estimator, with the denominator being the slope estimated from the logistic regression model. However, the MLE can be seriously biased when the sample size is small, a common nature in such studies, or when the dose-response curve is relatively flat (i.e. the slope approaches zero). In this study, we address these issues by developing a novel penalised maximum likelihood estimator (PMLE) that can prevent the denominator of the ratio from being close to zero. Similar to the MLE, the PMLE is computationally simple and thus can be conveniently used in practice. Moreover, with a suitable penalty parameter, we show that the PMLE can (a) reduce the bias to the second order with respect to the sample size and (b) avoid extreme estimates. Through simulation studies and real data applications, we show that the PMLE generally outperforms the existing methods in terms of bias and root mean square error.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新型惩罚似然法对 100p 百分致死剂量进行点估算。
药理学家在评估某些化合物的毒性时,对 100p 百分致死剂量(LD100p)的估算非常感兴趣。然而,现有文献大多侧重于 LD100p 的区间估算,很少关注其点估算。目前,最常用的 LD100p 估计方法是最大似然估计法(MLE),它可以表示为一个比率估计法,分母是逻辑回归模型估计的斜率。然而,当样本量较小时(这在此类研究中很常见),或当剂量-反应曲线相对平坦(即斜率接近零)时,最大似然估计值可能会出现严重偏差。在本研究中,我们通过开发一种新颖的惩罚最大似然估计器(PMLE)来解决这些问题,该估计器可以防止比值的分母接近零。与 MLE 相似,PMLE 计算简单,因此可以方便地用于实践。此外,通过适当的惩罚参数,我们证明 PMLE 可以:(a)将偏差降低到与样本大小相关的二阶;(b)避免极端估计值。通过模拟研究和实际数据应用,我们表明 PMLE 在偏差和均方根误差方面普遍优于现有方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 医学-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
127
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
LASSO-type instrumental variable selection methods with an application to Mendelian randomization. Estimating an adjusted risk difference in a cluster randomized trial with individual-level analyses. Testing for a treatment effect in a selected subgroup. Enhancing DHA supplementation adherence: A Bayesian approach with finite mixture models and irregular interim schedules in adaptive trial designs. Analysis of recurrent event data with spatial random effects using a Bayesian approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1