Individual treatment selection for patients with post-traumatic stress disorder: External validation of a personalised advantage index.

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2024.2360449
James Tait, Stephen Kellett, David Saxon, Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer, Wolfgang Lutz, Michael Barkham, Jaime Delgadillo
{"title":"Individual treatment selection for patients with post-traumatic stress disorder: External validation of a personalised advantage index.","authors":"James Tait, Stephen Kellett, David Saxon, Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer, Wolfgang Lutz, Michael Barkham, Jaime Delgadillo","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2360449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the predictive accuracy and generalisability of a personalised advantage index (PAI) model designed to support treatment selection for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A PAI model developed by Deisenhofer et al. (2018) was used to predict treatment outcomes in a statistically independent dataset including archival records for <i>N </i>= 152 patients with PSTD who accessed either trauma-focussed cognitive behavioural therapy or eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing in routine care. Outcomes were compared between patients who received their PAI-indicated optimal treatment versus those who received their suboptimal treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model did not yield treatment specific predictions and patients who had received their PAI-indicated optimal treatment did not have better treatment outcomes in this external validation sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This PAI model did not generalise to an external validation sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2360449","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To test the predictive accuracy and generalisability of a personalised advantage index (PAI) model designed to support treatment selection for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

Method: A PAI model developed by Deisenhofer et al. (2018) was used to predict treatment outcomes in a statistically independent dataset including archival records for N = 152 patients with PSTD who accessed either trauma-focussed cognitive behavioural therapy or eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing in routine care. Outcomes were compared between patients who received their PAI-indicated optimal treatment versus those who received their suboptimal treatment.

Results: The model did not yield treatment specific predictions and patients who had received their PAI-indicated optimal treatment did not have better treatment outcomes in this external validation sample.

Conclusion: This PAI model did not generalise to an external validation sample.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤后应激障碍患者的个性化治疗选择:个性化优势指数的外部验证。
目的:测试个性化优势指数(PAI)模型的预测准确性和通用性:测试旨在支持创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗选择的个性化优势指数(PAI)模型的预测准确性和可推广性:Deisenhofer等人(2018年)开发的PAI模型被用于预测统计独立数据集的治疗结果,该数据集包括N = 152名PSTD患者的档案记录,这些患者在常规护理中接受了创伤焦点认知行为疗法或眼动脱敏和再处理疗法。对接受 PAI 指示的最佳治疗的患者与接受次优治疗的患者的治疗结果进行了比较:结果:该模型没有得出特定治疗的预测结果,在外部验证样本中,接受 PAI 指示的最佳治疗的患者并没有获得更好的治疗效果:结论:这一 PAI 模型不能推广到外部验证样本中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
期刊最新文献
Therapists' emotional responses and their relation to patients' experience of attunement and responsiveness. Adolescent, caregivers, and therapists' experiences of youth and family suicide intervention: A qualitative study. Therapist responsiveness in psychotherapy: Introduction to the special issue. Therapists' experiences of negative effects in intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy: A qualitative interview study. Do treatments for mental disorders affect relationship satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1