User experience of a family health history chatbot: A quantitative analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1177/14604582241262251
Hiral Soni, Heath Morrison, Dinko Vasilev, Triton Ong, Hattie Wilczewski, Caitlin Allen, Chanita Hughes-Halbert, Jordon B Ritchie, Alexa Narma, Joshua D Schiffman, Julia Ivanova, Brian E Bunnell, Brandon M Welch
{"title":"User experience of a family health history chatbot: A quantitative analysis.","authors":"Hiral Soni, Heath Morrison, Dinko Vasilev, Triton Ong, Hattie Wilczewski, Caitlin Allen, Chanita Hughes-Halbert, Jordon B Ritchie, Alexa Narma, Joshua D Schiffman, Julia Ivanova, Brian E Bunnell, Brandon M Welch","doi":"10.1177/14604582241262251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Family health history (FHx) is an important tool in assessing one's risk towards specific health conditions. However, user experience of FHx collection tools is rarely studied. ItRunsInMyFamily.com (ItRuns) was developed to assess FHx and hereditary cancer risk. This study reports a quantitative user experience analysis of ItRuns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a public health campaign in November 2019 to promote FHx collection using ItRuns. We used software telemetry to quantify abandonment and time spent on ItRuns to identify user behaviors and potential areas of improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 11,065 users who started the ItRuns assessment, 4305 (38.91%) reached the final step to receive recommendations about hereditary cancer risk. Highest abandonment rates were during Introduction (32.82%), Invite Friends (29.03%), and Family Cancer History (12.03%) subflows. Median time to complete the assessment was 636 s. Users spent the highest median time on Proband Cancer History (124.00 s) and Family Cancer History (119.00 s) subflows. Search list questions took the longest to complete (median 19.50 s), followed by free text email input (15.00 s).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowledge of objective user behaviors at a large scale and factors impacting optimal user experience will help enhance the ItRuns workflow and improve future FHx collection.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 2","pages":"14604582241262251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241262251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Family health history (FHx) is an important tool in assessing one's risk towards specific health conditions. However, user experience of FHx collection tools is rarely studied. ItRunsInMyFamily.com (ItRuns) was developed to assess FHx and hereditary cancer risk. This study reports a quantitative user experience analysis of ItRuns.

Methods: We conducted a public health campaign in November 2019 to promote FHx collection using ItRuns. We used software telemetry to quantify abandonment and time spent on ItRuns to identify user behaviors and potential areas of improvement.

Results: Of 11,065 users who started the ItRuns assessment, 4305 (38.91%) reached the final step to receive recommendations about hereditary cancer risk. Highest abandonment rates were during Introduction (32.82%), Invite Friends (29.03%), and Family Cancer History (12.03%) subflows. Median time to complete the assessment was 636 s. Users spent the highest median time on Proband Cancer History (124.00 s) and Family Cancer History (119.00 s) subflows. Search list questions took the longest to complete (median 19.50 s), followed by free text email input (15.00 s).

Conclusion: Knowledge of objective user behaviors at a large scale and factors impacting optimal user experience will help enhance the ItRuns workflow and improve future FHx collection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭健康史聊天机器人的用户体验:定量分析
目的家庭健康史(FHx)是评估个人特定健康状况风险的重要工具。然而,很少有人研究过用户对家庭健康史收集工具的使用体验。ItRunsInMyFamily.com (ItRuns) 是为评估家族健康史和遗传性癌症风险而开发的。本研究对 ItRuns 的用户体验进行了定量分析:我们于 2019 年 11 月开展了一项公共卫生活动,推广使用 ItRuns 收集全血细胞计数。我们使用软件遥测技术量化了放弃率和在 ItRuns 上花费的时间,以确定用户行为和潜在的改进领域:在开始进行 ItRuns 评估的 11065 名用户中,有 4305 人(38.91%)完成了最后一步,获得了有关遗传性癌症风险的建议。放弃率最高的是 "介绍"(32.82%)、"邀请朋友"(29.03%)和 "家族癌症史"(12.03%)子流程。用户在 "癌症病史"(124.00 秒)和 "癌症家族史"(119.00 秒)子流程上花费的时间中位数最高。搜索列表问题花费的时间最长(中位数为 19.50 秒),其次是自由文本电子邮件输入(15.00 秒):结论:了解大规模用户的客观行为以及影响最佳用户体验的因素将有助于改进 ItRuns 工作流程,并改善未来的癌症病史收集工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
期刊最新文献
Empowering healthcare education: A multilingual ontology for medical informatics and digital health (MIMO) integrated to artificial intelligence powered training in smart hospitals. Analysis of health recommendations using longitudinal quality of life data: QoL@TbA - A transformer-based approach. Analysis of total RNA as a potential biomarker of developmental neurotoxicity in silico. Characterizing pituitary adenomas in clinical notes: Corpus construction and its application in LLMs. HealthCheck: A method for evaluating persuasive mobile health applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1