Differences in the clinical presentation of necrotizing fasciitis depending on the causative pathogen.

Hiroshi Kato, Yohei Kawaguchi, Kenta Saito, Shuzo Hamamoto, Ryota Nakamura, Kazuki Ohashi, Shuhei Kondo, Atsushi Nakamura, Akimichi Morita
{"title":"Differences in the clinical presentation of necrotizing fasciitis depending on the causative pathogen.","authors":"Hiroshi Kato, Yohei Kawaguchi, Kenta Saito, Shuzo Hamamoto, Ryota Nakamura, Kazuki Ohashi, Shuhei Kondo, Atsushi Nakamura, Akimichi Morita","doi":"10.1111/1346-8138.17325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Necrotizing fasciitis is a fatal, soft tissue infection of the skin that requires prompt treatment. Historically, most cases have been attributed to group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus infection. However, in recent years, other bacteria have been identified as causing necrotizing fasciitis. In the current study, we analyzed cases of necrotizing fasciitis and examined the significant differences in symptoms caused by pathogenic bacteria. We included 79 patients (43 males and 36 females, mean age 65.4 years) diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis who visited our hospital between April 2004 and July 2023. The patients were classified into five groups based on the identified pathogen: group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus; group B beta-hemolytic streptococcus; group G beta-hemolytic Streptococcus; mixed infection, including anaerobic bacteria; and Staphylococcus (S) aureus. The clinical characteristics of patients, including treatment duration and laboratory values, were analyzed. Group G beta-hemolytic Streptococcus was more common in older patients (Bonferroni method, p < 0.05). Patients with S. aureus tended to be hyperglycemic (Bonferroni method, p < 0.05), had a higher rate of bacteremia (Fisher's direct probability test, p < 0.05), and had a longer treatment duration than the other examined groups (Bonferroni method, p = 0.0132). Although the five groups did not differ in the mortality rate, overall survival was shorter in the mixed infection group than in the other groups (log-rank test, p < 0.05). The legs were the most common site of infection in the non-mixed infection group; in the mixed infection group, the pubic area was identified as the most common site of infection, accompanied by a poor prognosis. Collectively, these findings suggest that necrotizing fasciitis can be characterized by pathogenic bacteria and that these characteristics may inversely predict the pathogen of origin.</p>","PeriodicalId":94236,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.17325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Necrotizing fasciitis is a fatal, soft tissue infection of the skin that requires prompt treatment. Historically, most cases have been attributed to group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus infection. However, in recent years, other bacteria have been identified as causing necrotizing fasciitis. In the current study, we analyzed cases of necrotizing fasciitis and examined the significant differences in symptoms caused by pathogenic bacteria. We included 79 patients (43 males and 36 females, mean age 65.4 years) diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis who visited our hospital between April 2004 and July 2023. The patients were classified into five groups based on the identified pathogen: group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus; group B beta-hemolytic streptococcus; group G beta-hemolytic Streptococcus; mixed infection, including anaerobic bacteria; and Staphylococcus (S) aureus. The clinical characteristics of patients, including treatment duration and laboratory values, were analyzed. Group G beta-hemolytic Streptococcus was more common in older patients (Bonferroni method, p < 0.05). Patients with S. aureus tended to be hyperglycemic (Bonferroni method, p < 0.05), had a higher rate of bacteremia (Fisher's direct probability test, p < 0.05), and had a longer treatment duration than the other examined groups (Bonferroni method, p = 0.0132). Although the five groups did not differ in the mortality rate, overall survival was shorter in the mixed infection group than in the other groups (log-rank test, p < 0.05). The legs were the most common site of infection in the non-mixed infection group; in the mixed infection group, the pubic area was identified as the most common site of infection, accompanied by a poor prognosis. Collectively, these findings suggest that necrotizing fasciitis can be characterized by pathogenic bacteria and that these characteristics may inversely predict the pathogen of origin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坏死性筋膜炎的临床表现因致病病原体而异。
坏死性筋膜炎是一种致命的皮肤软组织感染,需要及时治疗。从历史上看,大多数病例都是由 A 组 beta 溶血性链球菌感染引起的。然而,近年来发现有其他细菌可引起坏死性筋膜炎。在本研究中,我们分析了坏死性筋膜炎病例,并研究了致病菌引起的症状的显著差异。我们纳入了 2004 年 4 月至 2023 年 7 月期间在本医院就诊的 79 例坏死性筋膜炎患者(男性 43 例,女性 36 例,平均年龄 65.4 岁)。根据确定的病原体将患者分为五组:A 组 β 溶血性链球菌、B 组 β 溶血性链球菌、G 组 β 溶血性链球菌、混合感染(包括厌氧菌)和金黄色葡萄球菌。分析了患者的临床特征,包括治疗时间和实验室值。G 组乙型溶血性链球菌在年龄较大的患者中更为常见(Bonferroni 法,p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of cultured epidermal autograft for rhododendrol-induced leukoderma of the face. A case of digital papillary adenocarcinoma with human papillomavirus 42 detected. Effectiveness of long-term bimekizumab treatment and predictive factors for responders in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: A 52-week real-world study. Refractory acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau successfully treated by baricitinib: A case report. The role of ingrown hairs in persistent kerion of children: A clinical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1