Waste to protein: A systematic review of a century of advancement in microbial fermentation of agro-industrial byproducts

IF 12 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1111/1541-4337.13375
Cresha Gracy Nadar, Andrew Fletcher, Bruno Rafael de Almeida Moreira, Damian Hine, Sudhir Yadav
{"title":"Waste to protein: A systematic review of a century of advancement in microbial fermentation of agro-industrial byproducts","authors":"Cresha Gracy Nadar,&nbsp;Andrew Fletcher,&nbsp;Bruno Rafael de Almeida Moreira,&nbsp;Damian Hine,&nbsp;Sudhir Yadav","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.13375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasing global consumption of protein over the last five decades, coupled with concerns about the impact on emissions of animal-based protein production, has created interest in alternative protein sources. Microbial proteins (MPs), derived through the fermentation of agro-industrial byproducts, present a promising option. This review assesses a century of advancements in this domain. We conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis, examining 347 relevant research papers to identify trends, technological advancements, and key influencing factors in the production of MP. The analysis covered the types of feedstocks and microbes, fermentation methods, and the implications of nucleic acid content on the food-grade quality of proteins. A conditional inference tree model and Bayesian factor were used to ascertain the impact of various parameters on protein content. Out of all the studied parameters, such as type of feedstock (lignocellulose, free sugars, gases, and others), type of fermentation (solid, liquid, gas), type of microbe (bacteria, fungi, yeast, and mix), and operating parameters (temperature, time, and pH), the type of fermentation and microbe were identified as the largest influences on protein content. Gas and liquid fermentation demonstrated higher protein content, averaging 52% and 42%, respectively. Among microbes, bacterial species produced a higher protein content of 51%. The suitable operating parameters, such as pH, time, and temperature, were also identified for different microbes. The results point to opportunities for continued innovation in feedstock, microbes, and regulatory alignment to fully realize the potential of MP in contributing to global food security and sustainability goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.13375","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.13375","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing global consumption of protein over the last five decades, coupled with concerns about the impact on emissions of animal-based protein production, has created interest in alternative protein sources. Microbial proteins (MPs), derived through the fermentation of agro-industrial byproducts, present a promising option. This review assesses a century of advancements in this domain. We conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis, examining 347 relevant research papers to identify trends, technological advancements, and key influencing factors in the production of MP. The analysis covered the types of feedstocks and microbes, fermentation methods, and the implications of nucleic acid content on the food-grade quality of proteins. A conditional inference tree model and Bayesian factor were used to ascertain the impact of various parameters on protein content. Out of all the studied parameters, such as type of feedstock (lignocellulose, free sugars, gases, and others), type of fermentation (solid, liquid, gas), type of microbe (bacteria, fungi, yeast, and mix), and operating parameters (temperature, time, and pH), the type of fermentation and microbe were identified as the largest influences on protein content. Gas and liquid fermentation demonstrated higher protein content, averaging 52% and 42%, respectively. Among microbes, bacterial species produced a higher protein content of 51%. The suitable operating parameters, such as pH, time, and temperature, were also identified for different microbes. The results point to opportunities for continued innovation in feedstock, microbes, and regulatory alignment to fully realize the potential of MP in contributing to global food security and sustainability goals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
废物变蛋白质:对一个世纪以来农用工业副产品微生物发酵进展的系统回顾。
过去五十年来,全球蛋白质消费量不断增加,加上人们对动物蛋白质生产对排放的影响的担忧,使人们对替代蛋白质来源产生了兴趣。通过发酵农用工业副产品获得的微生物蛋白质(MPs)是一种前景广阔的选择。本综述评估了这一领域一个世纪以来取得的进展。我们对 347 篇相关研究论文进行了全面回顾和荟萃分析,以确定 MP 生产的趋势、技术进步和关键影响因素。分析涵盖了原料和微生物的类型、发酵方法以及核酸含量对蛋白质食品级质量的影响。利用条件推理树模型和贝叶斯因子确定了各种参数对蛋白质含量的影响。在所有研究参数中,如原料类型(木质纤维素、游离糖、气体和其他)、发酵类型(固体、液体、气体)、微生物类型(细菌、真菌、酵母和混合)和操作参数(温度、时间和 pH 值),发酵类型和微生物被确定为对蛋白质含量影响最大的参数。气体发酵和液体发酵的蛋白质含量较高,平均分别为 52% 和 42%。在微生物中,细菌种类产生的蛋白质含量较高,达到 51%。此外,还确定了适合不同微生物的操作参数,如 pH 值、时间和温度。研究结果表明,要充分发挥 MP 在促进全球粮食安全和可持续发展目标方面的潜力,还需要在原料、微生物和监管协调方面不断创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Advanced functional materials as reliable tools for capturing food-derived peptides to optimize the peptidomics pre-treatment enrichment workflow. Advances in valorization of sweet potato peels: A comprehensive review on the nutritional compositions, phytochemical profiles, nutraceutical properties, and potential industrial applications Announcing the 2024 Manfred Kroger Award winner for Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety Quality and stability of frying oils and fried foods in ultrasound and microwave–assisted frying processes and hybrid technologies The role of fermentation with lactic acid bacteria in quality and health effects of plant-based dairy analogues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1