Deciphering Discord: How Conflicting Information and Political Ideology Shape Public Attitude Toward PFAS Regulation.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Health Communication Pub Date : 2024-07-02 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1080/10810730.2024.2367111
Xinxia Dong, Janet Z Yang
{"title":"Deciphering Discord: How Conflicting Information and Political Ideology Shape Public Attitude Toward PFAS Regulation.","authors":"Xinxia Dong, Janet Z Yang","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2024.2367111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) contamination is an emerging environmental and health risk facing the world. This study examines the impact of conflicting information on Americans' attitude toward PFAS regulation and intention to engage in mitigation behaviors through a one-way, between-subjects experiment. Participants were 1,062 U.S. adults recruited from CloudResearch. Results showed that compared to participants exposed to consistent information, those exposed to conflicting information displayed less favorable attitude toward existing regulation, which led to lower intention to support related policies and to engage in mitigation behaviors. Political ideology moderated these relationships, with stronger experimental effects among conservatives. These findings underscore the importance of conveying consistent risk messages, especially when multiple stakeholders are involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"409-419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2024.2367111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) contamination is an emerging environmental and health risk facing the world. This study examines the impact of conflicting information on Americans' attitude toward PFAS regulation and intention to engage in mitigation behaviors through a one-way, between-subjects experiment. Participants were 1,062 U.S. adults recruited from CloudResearch. Results showed that compared to participants exposed to consistent information, those exposed to conflicting information displayed less favorable attitude toward existing regulation, which led to lower intention to support related policies and to engage in mitigation behaviors. Political ideology moderated these relationships, with stronger experimental effects among conservatives. These findings underscore the importance of conveying consistent risk messages, especially when multiple stakeholders are involved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解密不和谐:相互冲突的信息和政治意识形态如何影响公众对 PFAS 监管的态度。
全氟和多氟化合物(PFAS)污染是全球面临的一个新的环境和健康风险。本研究通过一个单向、主体间实验,考察了相互冲突的信息对美国人对全氟辛烷磺酸(PFAS)监管的态度以及参与减排行为的意愿的影响。参与者是从 CloudResearch 征集的 1062 名美国成年人。结果显示,与接触到一致信息的参与者相比,接触到冲突信息的参与者对现有法规的态度较差,从而导致支持相关政策和参与减排行为的意愿较低。政治意识形态调节了这些关系,保守派的实验效果更强。这些发现强调了传达一致的风险信息的重要性,尤其是当涉及多个利益相关者时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
期刊最新文献
The Relationships Between Adverse Childhood Experiences, Patient-Centered Communication, and Care-Seeking Intention. Identifying Persuasive Visual Features within Tobacco Pictorial Warnings: Effects on Anticipated Loss of Face, Gifting, and Refrain Intentions Among Chinese Men Who Smoke. Safeguarding Quality in Health and Medical Science Information Today. Assessing Reactance to Culturally Tailored Anti-Smoking Messages in Sexual and Gender Minority Young Adults. Plastic Waste Ads Attributes Generating Awareness, Interest, Attitudes and Desires to Act Pro-Environmentally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1