Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in elderly patients: A retrospective study

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1111/ases.13331
Shu Aoyama, Yoshiaki Ohmura, Yutaka Takeda, Yoshiteru Katsura, Mitsuru Kinoshita, Go Shinke, Yukari Kihara, Kiminori Yanagisawa, Shinsuke Katsuyama, Ryo Ikeshima, Masayuki Hiraki, Keijiro Sugimura, Toru Masuzawa, Taishi Hata, Kohei Murata
{"title":"Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in elderly patients: A retrospective study","authors":"Shu Aoyama,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Ohmura,&nbsp;Yutaka Takeda,&nbsp;Yoshiteru Katsura,&nbsp;Mitsuru Kinoshita,&nbsp;Go Shinke,&nbsp;Yukari Kihara,&nbsp;Kiminori Yanagisawa,&nbsp;Shinsuke Katsuyama,&nbsp;Ryo Ikeshima,&nbsp;Masayuki Hiraki,&nbsp;Keijiro Sugimura,&nbsp;Toru Masuzawa,&nbsp;Taishi Hata,&nbsp;Kohei Murata","doi":"10.1111/ases.13331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Previous studies have not evaluated the surgical difficulty of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in elderly patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of elderly age on the perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy, focusing on surgical difficulty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer at Kansai Rosai Hospital between September 2012 and December 2023. Perioperative outcomes were investigated between the elderly (&gt;75 years) and non-elderly (≤75 years) groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-six patients were included: 26 and 30 in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively. The median operative time was significantly shorter in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group (324 vs. 414 min, <i>p</i> = .022), but other surgical outcomes were not significantly different including oncological factors. The median difficulty score was similar between the elderly and non-elderly groups (6 vs. 7, respectively; <i>p</i> = .699). The incidences of postoperative complications and pancreatic fistulas were not significantly different in the elderly and non-elderly groups (23% vs. 43%, <i>p</i> = .159, and 19% vs. 36%, <i>p</i> = .236, respectively), even though analyzed in subgroups with low-to-intermediate or high difficulty score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The safety and feasibility of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer were not significantly different between elderly and non-elderly patients, even when surgical difficulty was considered. This surgical procedure can be safe and feasible for elderly patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.13331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Previous studies have not evaluated the surgical difficulty of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in elderly patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of elderly age on the perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy, focusing on surgical difficulty.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer at Kansai Rosai Hospital between September 2012 and December 2023. Perioperative outcomes were investigated between the elderly (>75 years) and non-elderly (≤75 years) groups.

Results

Fifty-six patients were included: 26 and 30 in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively. The median operative time was significantly shorter in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group (324 vs. 414 min, p = .022), but other surgical outcomes were not significantly different including oncological factors. The median difficulty score was similar between the elderly and non-elderly groups (6 vs. 7, respectively; p = .699). The incidences of postoperative complications and pancreatic fistulas were not significantly different in the elderly and non-elderly groups (23% vs. 43%, p = .159, and 19% vs. 36%, p = .236, respectively), even though analyzed in subgroups with low-to-intermediate or high difficulty score.

Conclusions

The safety and feasibility of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer were not significantly different between elderly and non-elderly patients, even when surgical difficulty was considered. This surgical procedure can be safe and feasible for elderly patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年患者胰腺癌微创远端胰腺切除术的安全性和可行性:回顾性研究
简介:以往的研究并未评估老年患者胰腺癌微创远端胰腺切除术的手术难度。因此,我们旨在研究老年患者的年龄对微创胰腺远端切除术围手术期结果的影响,重点关注手术难度:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2012年9月至2023年12月期间在关西罗赛医院接受胰腺癌微创远端胰腺切除术的患者。对老年组(>75 岁)和非老年组(≤75 岁)的围手术期结果进行了调查:结果:共纳入 56 名患者:结果:共纳入 56 例患者:老年组和非老年组分别有 26 例和 30 例。老年组的中位手术时间明显短于非老年组(324 分钟对 414 分钟,P = .022),但包括肿瘤因素在内的其他手术结果无明显差异。老年组和非老年组的中位难度评分相似(分别为 6 分和 7 分;P = .699)。术后并发症和胰腺瘘的发生率在老年组和非老年组之间无明显差异(分别为23% vs. 43%, p = .159和19% vs. 36%, p = .236),即使在中低或高难度评分的亚组中进行分析也是如此:结论:微创胰腺远端切除术治疗胰腺癌的安全性和可行性在老年患者和非老年患者之间没有显著差异,即使考虑到手术难度也是如此。对于老年患者来说,这种手术方法是安全可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection After Chemotherapy for Nonseminomatous Testicular Germ-Cell Tumor at a Single Center. Perioperative Outcomes and Feasibility of Single-Stage Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) and Cholecystectomy With Internal Endo-Biliary Drainage for Management of Concomitant Cholelithiasis With Choledocholithiasis: A Report From a Tertiary Care Hospital. The financial impact of robotic surgery on hospital gross profits in Japan compared to laparoscopic surgery Close Contact Transillumination Light Guides Surgeon to Vaginal Point Aa: Pharus Method for Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy Usefulness of participation of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system-qualified surgeons in laparoscopic high anterior resection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1