Teketo Kassaw Tegegne , Desalegn Markos Shifti , Jonathan Charles Rawstorn , Paul Jansons , Yuxin Zhang , Reza Daryabeygikhotbehsara , Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam , Ralph Maddison
{"title":"Digital lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Teketo Kassaw Tegegne , Desalegn Markos Shifti , Jonathan Charles Rawstorn , Paul Jansons , Yuxin Zhang , Reza Daryabeygikhotbehsara , Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam , Ralph Maddison","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the relative effectiveness of different digital lifestyle interventions in improving cardiovascular risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Seven electronic databases were searched from 1990 to April 4, 2024. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed. Continuous outcomes are reported as mean differences (MD) with their 95 % credible intervals (CrI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The combinations of physical activity + diet + smoking cessation (PA+<em>D</em>+Sm), and physical activity + diet (PA+<em>D</em>) components were the most effective interventions, leading to substantial improvements in multiple cardiovascular risk factors compared to usual care or some other digital lifestyle interventions with low to high certainty. Dietary interventions significantly reduced body weight and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) compared to usual care. Although the effect sizes did not meet established clinical significance thresholds for most cardiovascular risk factors, they still hold clinical relevance, highlighting the potential for significant health improvements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Multifactorial digital lifestyle interventions, particularly those combining PA+<em>D</em>+Sm and PA+<em>D</em> components, appear the most promising for reducing cardiovascular risk factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 3","pages":"Article 100879"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221188372400042X/pdfft?md5=a95f7e2f82a073a60e8ee9323871b80d&pid=1-s2.0-S221188372400042X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221188372400042X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To compare the relative effectiveness of different digital lifestyle interventions in improving cardiovascular risk factors.
Methods
A comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Seven electronic databases were searched from 1990 to April 4, 2024. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed. Continuous outcomes are reported as mean differences (MD) with their 95 % credible intervals (CrI).
Results
The combinations of physical activity + diet + smoking cessation (PA+D+Sm), and physical activity + diet (PA+D) components were the most effective interventions, leading to substantial improvements in multiple cardiovascular risk factors compared to usual care or some other digital lifestyle interventions with low to high certainty. Dietary interventions significantly reduced body weight and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) compared to usual care. Although the effect sizes did not meet established clinical significance thresholds for most cardiovascular risk factors, they still hold clinical relevance, highlighting the potential for significant health improvements.
Conclusions
Multifactorial digital lifestyle interventions, particularly those combining PA+D+Sm and PA+D components, appear the most promising for reducing cardiovascular risk factors.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics