Think Drink: Feasibility trial of a multicomponent hydration care intervention for people living with dementia in care homes

Glenda Anne Cook, Philip Hodgson, Vincent Deary
{"title":"Think Drink: Feasibility trial of a multicomponent hydration care intervention for people living with dementia in care homes","authors":"Glenda Anne Cook,&nbsp;Philip Hodgson,&nbsp;Vincent Deary","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aim</h3><p>People with dementia, and particularly those living in care homes are at risk of suboptimal hydration and dehydration. Individual, contextual and staffing factors affect drinking behaviour in this population, hence multicomponent hydration care interventions have been promoted. The aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a multicomponent Think Drink intervention for supporting hydration for people living with dementia in English care homes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cluster randomised controlled feasibility study compared 6 intervention care homes and 5 control homes, over 3-months. Data (fluid intake; admission to hospital/dehydration; falls; laxative use; urinary tract infection and upper respiratory tract infection) was collected from 50 residents living with dementia in the intervention group and 37 control group pre and post intervention. Post intervention, 45 care home staff took part in 9 individual and 17 small group interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Think Drink was feasible and acceptable to participating care home staff. The findings highlighted how Think Drink changed staff knowledge of hydration requirements and new hydration practices were implemented in care homes. No significant positive change in fluid intake was found in the intervention group in terms of mean and median fluid intake in previous seven days, and proportion of population achieving an intake greater than 1,600 mls per day. This could be attributed to improvement in recording fluid intake following the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Whilst Think Drink is acceptable to care home staff further research is required to address methodological issues in assessing efficacy in supporting fluid intake.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 74-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000421/pdfft?md5=4f57ab3ce02e8d97f4d7d6c194998dc9&pid=1-s2.0-S2667268524000421-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim

People with dementia, and particularly those living in care homes are at risk of suboptimal hydration and dehydration. Individual, contextual and staffing factors affect drinking behaviour in this population, hence multicomponent hydration care interventions have been promoted. The aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a multicomponent Think Drink intervention for supporting hydration for people living with dementia in English care homes.

Methods

A cluster randomised controlled feasibility study compared 6 intervention care homes and 5 control homes, over 3-months. Data (fluid intake; admission to hospital/dehydration; falls; laxative use; urinary tract infection and upper respiratory tract infection) was collected from 50 residents living with dementia in the intervention group and 37 control group pre and post intervention. Post intervention, 45 care home staff took part in 9 individual and 17 small group interviews.

Results

Think Drink was feasible and acceptable to participating care home staff. The findings highlighted how Think Drink changed staff knowledge of hydration requirements and new hydration practices were implemented in care homes. No significant positive change in fluid intake was found in the intervention group in terms of mean and median fluid intake in previous seven days, and proportion of population achieving an intake greater than 1,600 mls per day. This could be attributed to improvement in recording fluid intake following the intervention.

Conclusions

Whilst Think Drink is acceptable to care home staff further research is required to address methodological issues in assessing efficacy in supporting fluid intake.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
想想喝水针对护理院痴呆症患者的多成分水合护理干预可行性试验
背景和目的痴呆症患者,尤其是生活在护理院中的痴呆症患者面临着水合不足和脱水的风险。个人、环境和人员配置等因素都会影响这类人群的饮水行为,因此人们提倡采取多成分水合护理干预措施。该研究旨在评估多成分 "想喝 "干预措施的可行性和可接受性,以支持英国护理院中痴呆症患者的水合护理。方法 一项群组随机对照可行性研究比较了 6 家干预护理院和 5 家对照护理院,为期 3 个月。从干预组的 50 名痴呆症患者和对照组的 37 名患者处收集了干预前后的数据(液体摄入量、入院/脱水、跌倒、泻药使用、尿路感染和上呼吸道感染)。干预后,45 名护理院员工参加了 9 次个别访谈和 17 次小组访谈。调查结果强调了 Think Drink 如何改变了员工对水合要求的认识,并在护理院中实施了新的水合实践。就前七天液体摄入量的平均值和中位数以及每天摄入量超过 1600 毫升的人口比例而言,干预组在液体摄入量方面没有发现明显的积极变化。结论虽然 Think Drink 可以为护理院员工所接受,但还需要进一步研究,以解决评估支持液体摄入效果的方法问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum regarding missing conflict of interests/consent statements in previously published articles A six-month randomized controlled pilot study evaluating the effects of an oral nutrition supplement on children's growth patterns Risk factors of postoperative infections in patients with iatrogenic gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Adherence, tolerance, and patterns of use of an oral adapted texture nutritional formula in malnourished patients with dysphagia Continuum of Care - Building bridges between different phases of the patient's pathway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1