Yuvthi Lutchman , Rajiv Mahajan , Suzanne M. Cosh , Katie Harris , Christophe Tzourio , Phillip J. Tully
{"title":"Under pressure: A systematic review of the association between blood pressure variability with depression and anxiety","authors":"Yuvthi Lutchman , Rajiv Mahajan , Suzanne M. Cosh , Katie Harris , Christophe Tzourio , Phillip J. Tully","doi":"10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Blood pressure variability (BPV) impacts brain health by influencing brain structure and cerebrovascular pathologies, though the mechanisms are poorly understood. Changes in the cerebrovasculature may lead to late-onset depression, cognitive impairment, and dementia, however the relationship between BPV with depression and anxiety remains unclear, due to methodological differences and inconsistencies in past research. This review aims to clarify the association between BPV with depression and anxiety in adults to inform understandings of the mechanisms implicating BPV in cognitive health. A systematic search from inception through to January 2024 was performed on Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Studies that assessed BPV quantified by beat-to-beat, 24-hour, or visit-to-visit were eligible if the standardised assessment of depression and/or anxiety were reported as a linear association, or mean differences across control and affect groups. A total of 14 articles reporting on 13 samples and <em>N</em> = 5055 persons met the inclusion criteria (median female proportion = 61 %, range 0 % - 76 %). A meta-analysis was not possible due to methodological heterogeneity in BPV measurements and metrics across studies. Mixed results were observed across depression studies with inconsistencies and variation in the direction, strength of association, and BPV metric. There was weak evidence from only three studies to support a linear association between systolic coefficient of variation and anxiety. Collectively, the findings contribute to understanding the association between BPV and brain health, suggesting that any relationship between BPV and brain structures critical for cognitive function are independent of depression and only modestly implicate anxiety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72549,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245024000291/pdfft?md5=d347ef9f4218320c499e7b0240f9741d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666245024000291-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245024000291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Blood pressure variability (BPV) impacts brain health by influencing brain structure and cerebrovascular pathologies, though the mechanisms are poorly understood. Changes in the cerebrovasculature may lead to late-onset depression, cognitive impairment, and dementia, however the relationship between BPV with depression and anxiety remains unclear, due to methodological differences and inconsistencies in past research. This review aims to clarify the association between BPV with depression and anxiety in adults to inform understandings of the mechanisms implicating BPV in cognitive health. A systematic search from inception through to January 2024 was performed on Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Studies that assessed BPV quantified by beat-to-beat, 24-hour, or visit-to-visit were eligible if the standardised assessment of depression and/or anxiety were reported as a linear association, or mean differences across control and affect groups. A total of 14 articles reporting on 13 samples and N = 5055 persons met the inclusion criteria (median female proportion = 61 %, range 0 % - 76 %). A meta-analysis was not possible due to methodological heterogeneity in BPV measurements and metrics across studies. Mixed results were observed across depression studies with inconsistencies and variation in the direction, strength of association, and BPV metric. There was weak evidence from only three studies to support a linear association between systolic coefficient of variation and anxiety. Collectively, the findings contribute to understanding the association between BPV and brain health, suggesting that any relationship between BPV and brain structures critical for cognitive function are independent of depression and only modestly implicate anxiety.