Quantitative prediction of postpartum hemorrhage in cesarean section on machine learning.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02571-7
Meng Wang, Gao Yi, Yunjia Zhang, Mei Li, Jin Zhang
{"title":"Quantitative prediction of postpartum hemorrhage in cesarean section on machine learning.","authors":"Meng Wang, Gao Yi, Yunjia Zhang, Mei Li, Jin Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02571-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean section-induced postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) potentially causes anemia and hypovolemic shock in pregnant women. Hence, it is helpful for obstetricians and anesthesiologists to prepare pre-emptive prevention when predicting PPH occurrence in advance. However, current works on PPH prediction focus on whether PPH occurs rather than assessing PPH amount. To this end, this work studies quantitative PPH prediction with machine learning (ML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort in this paper was selected from individuals with PPH who were hospitalized at Shijiazhuang Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from 2020 to 2022. In this study cohort, we built a dataset with 6,144 subjects covering clinical parameters, anesthesia operation records, laboratory examination results, and other information in the electronic medical record system. Based on our built dataset, we exploit six different ML models, including logistic regression, linear regression, gradient boosting, XGBoost, multilayer perceptron, and random forest, to automatically predict the amount of bleeding during cesarean section. Eighty percent of the dataset was used as model training, and 20 <math><mo>%</mo></math> was used for verification. Those ML models are constantly verified and improved by root mean squared error(RMSE) and mean absolute error(MAE). Moreover, we also leverage the importance of permutation and partial dependence plot (PDP) to discuss their feasibility.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The experiment results show that random forest obtains the highest accuracy for PPH amount prediction compared to other ML methods. Random forest reaches the mean absolute error of 21.7, less than 5.4 <math><mo>%</mo></math> prediction error. It also gains the root mean squared error of 33.75, less than 9.3 <math><mo>%</mo></math> prediction error. On the other hand, the experimental results also disclose indicators that contributed most to PPH prediction, including Ca, hemoglobin, white blood cells, platelets, Na, and K.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It effectively predicts the amount of PPH during a cesarean section by ML methods, especially random forest. With the above insight, ML predicting PPH amounts provides early warning for clinicians, thus reducing complications and improving cesarean sections' safety. Furthermore, the importance of ML and permutation, complemented by incorporating PDP, promises to provide clinicians with a transparent indication of individual risk prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02571-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section-induced postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) potentially causes anemia and hypovolemic shock in pregnant women. Hence, it is helpful for obstetricians and anesthesiologists to prepare pre-emptive prevention when predicting PPH occurrence in advance. However, current works on PPH prediction focus on whether PPH occurs rather than assessing PPH amount. To this end, this work studies quantitative PPH prediction with machine learning (ML).

Methods: The study cohort in this paper was selected from individuals with PPH who were hospitalized at Shijiazhuang Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from 2020 to 2022. In this study cohort, we built a dataset with 6,144 subjects covering clinical parameters, anesthesia operation records, laboratory examination results, and other information in the electronic medical record system. Based on our built dataset, we exploit six different ML models, including logistic regression, linear regression, gradient boosting, XGBoost, multilayer perceptron, and random forest, to automatically predict the amount of bleeding during cesarean section. Eighty percent of the dataset was used as model training, and 20 % was used for verification. Those ML models are constantly verified and improved by root mean squared error(RMSE) and mean absolute error(MAE). Moreover, we also leverage the importance of permutation and partial dependence plot (PDP) to discuss their feasibility.

Result: The experiment results show that random forest obtains the highest accuracy for PPH amount prediction compared to other ML methods. Random forest reaches the mean absolute error of 21.7, less than 5.4 % prediction error. It also gains the root mean squared error of 33.75, less than 9.3 % prediction error. On the other hand, the experimental results also disclose indicators that contributed most to PPH prediction, including Ca, hemoglobin, white blood cells, platelets, Na, and K.

Conclusion: It effectively predicts the amount of PPH during a cesarean section by ML methods, especially random forest. With the above insight, ML predicting PPH amounts provides early warning for clinicians, thus reducing complications and improving cesarean sections' safety. Furthermore, the importance of ML and permutation, complemented by incorporating PDP, promises to provide clinicians with a transparent indication of individual risk prediction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习定量预测剖腹产产后出血。
背景:剖宫产引起的产后出血(PPH)可能会导致孕妇贫血和低血容量性休克。因此,提前预测 PPH 的发生有助于产科医生和麻醉师做好预防准备。然而,目前有关 PPH 预测的研究主要集中在是否发生 PPH,而不是评估 PPH 的量。为此,本研究利用机器学习(ML)对 PPH 进行定量预测:本文的研究队列选自 2020 年至 2022 年在石家庄市妇产医院住院治疗的 PPH 患者。在该研究队列中,我们建立了一个包含 6,144 名受试者的数据集,涵盖了电子病历系统中的临床参数、麻醉操作记录、实验室检查结果和其他信息。根据建立的数据集,我们利用六种不同的 ML 模型,包括逻辑回归、线性回归、梯度提升、XGBoost、多层感知器和随机森林,来自动预测剖宫产术中的出血量。数据集的 80% 用于模型训练,20% 用于验证。这些 ML 模型通过均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)不断得到验证和改进。此外,我们还利用排列和部分依赖图(PDP)的重要性来讨论其可行性:实验结果表明,与其他 ML 方法相比,随机森林预测 PPH 的准确率最高。随机森林的平均绝对误差为 21.7,小于 5.4%的预测误差。它还获得了 33.75 的均方根误差,小于 9.3 % 的预测误差。另一方面,实验结果还显示了对 PPH 预测贡献最大的指标,包括 Ca、血红蛋白、白细胞、血小板、Na 和 K:通过 ML 方法,尤其是随机森林方法,可以有效预测剖宫产过程中 PPH 的发生量。有了上述认识,ML 预测 PPH 量可为临床医生提供早期预警,从而减少并发症,提高剖宫产手术的安全性。此外,ML 和置换的重要性,再辅以 PDP,有望为临床医生提供透明的个体风险预测指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
期刊最新文献
Real-world data to support post-market safety and performance of embolization coils: evidence generation from a medical device manufacturer and data institute partnership. Development of message passing-based graph convolutional networks for classifying cancer pathology reports Machine learning-based evaluation of prognostic factors for mortality and relapse in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comparative simulation study A cross domain access control model for medical consortium based on DBSCAN and penalty function RCC-Supporter: supporting renal cell carcinoma treatment decision-making using machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1