Proton-Pump Inhibitors to Prevent Gastrointestinal Bleeding - An Updated Meta-Analysis.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400134
Ying Wang, Sameer Parpia, Long Ge, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Honghao Lai, Meisam Abdar Esfahani, Bei Pan, Waleed Alhazzani, Stefan Schandelmaier, Francois Lauzier, Yaseen Arabi, Jeffrey Barletta, Adam Deane, Simon Finfer, David Williamson, Salmaan Kanji, Morten H Møller, Anders Perner, Mette Krag, Paul J Young, Joanna C Dionne, Naomi Hammond, Zhikang Ye, Quazi Ibrahim, Deborah Cook
{"title":"Proton-Pump Inhibitors to Prevent Gastrointestinal Bleeding - An Updated Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ying Wang, Sameer Parpia, Long Ge, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Honghao Lai, Meisam Abdar Esfahani, Bei Pan, Waleed Alhazzani, Stefan Schandelmaier, Francois Lauzier, Yaseen Arabi, Jeffrey Barletta, Adam Deane, Simon Finfer, David Williamson, Salmaan Kanji, Morten H Møller, Anders Perner, Mette Krag, Paul J Young, Joanna C Dionne, Naomi Hammond, Zhikang Ye, Quazi Ibrahim, Deborah Cook","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this systematic review was to examine the efficacy and safety of proton-pump inhibitors for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included randomized trials comparing proton-pump inhibitors versus placebo or no prophylaxis in critically ill adults, performed meta-analyses, and assessed certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. To explore the effect of proton-pump inhibitors on mortality based on disease severity, a subgroup analysis was conducted combining within-trial subgroup data from the two largest trials and assessed credibility using the Instrument for Assessing the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve trials that enrolled 9533 patients were included. Proton-pump inhibitors were associated with a reduced incidence of clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding (relative risk [RR], 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34 to 0.76]; high certainty evidence). Proton-pump inhibitors may have little or no effect on mortality (RR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.05]; low certainty). Within-trial subgroup analysis with intermediate credibility suggested that the effect of proton-pump inhibitors on mortality may differ based on disease severity. Subgroup results raise the possibility that proton-pump inhibitors may decrease 90-day mortality in less severely ill patients (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.98) and may increase mortality in more severely ill patients (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.20]. Proton-pump inhibitors may have no effect on pneumonia and little or no effect on <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High certainty evidence supports the association of proton-pump inhibitors with decreased upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Proton-pump inhibitors may have little or no effect on mortality, although a decrease in mortality in less severely ill patients and an increase in mortality in more severely ill patients remain possible. (PROSPERO number CRD42023461695.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDoa2400134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The goal of this systematic review was to examine the efficacy and safety of proton-pump inhibitors for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients.

Methods: We included randomized trials comparing proton-pump inhibitors versus placebo or no prophylaxis in critically ill adults, performed meta-analyses, and assessed certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. To explore the effect of proton-pump inhibitors on mortality based on disease severity, a subgroup analysis was conducted combining within-trial subgroup data from the two largest trials and assessed credibility using the Instrument for Assessing the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses.

Results: Twelve trials that enrolled 9533 patients were included. Proton-pump inhibitors were associated with a reduced incidence of clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding (relative risk [RR], 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34 to 0.76]; high certainty evidence). Proton-pump inhibitors may have little or no effect on mortality (RR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.05]; low certainty). Within-trial subgroup analysis with intermediate credibility suggested that the effect of proton-pump inhibitors on mortality may differ based on disease severity. Subgroup results raise the possibility that proton-pump inhibitors may decrease 90-day mortality in less severely ill patients (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.98) and may increase mortality in more severely ill patients (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.20]. Proton-pump inhibitors may have no effect on pneumonia and little or no effect on Clostridioides difficile infection (low certainty).

Conclusions: High certainty evidence supports the association of proton-pump inhibitors with decreased upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Proton-pump inhibitors may have little or no effect on mortality, although a decrease in mortality in less severely ill patients and an increase in mortality in more severely ill patients remain possible. (PROSPERO number CRD42023461695.).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质子泵抑制剂预防胃肠道出血--最新的 Meta 分析。
背景:本系统性综述旨在研究质子泵抑制剂用于重症患者应激性溃疡预防的有效性和安全性:本系统综述旨在研究质子泵抑制剂对重症患者预防应激性溃疡的有效性和安全性:我们纳入了质子泵抑制剂与安慰剂或无预防措施的成人重症患者的随机试验,进行了荟萃分析,并采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级法评估了证据的确定性。为了探讨质子泵抑制剂根据疾病严重程度对死亡率的影响,结合两项最大试验的试验内亚组数据进行了亚组分析,并使用效果修正分析可信度评估工具对可信度进行了评估:结果:共纳入了12项试验,9533名患者参与了试验。质子泵抑制剂与临床上重要的上消化道出血发生率降低有关(相对风险[RR],0.51[95% 置信区间(CI),0.34 至 0.76];高确定性证据)。质子泵抑制剂对死亡率的影响可能很小或没有影响(RR,0.99 [95% CI,0.93 至 1.05];低确定性证据)。具有中等可信度的试验内亚组分析表明,质子泵抑制剂对死亡率的影响可能因疾病严重程度而异。亚组结果表明,质子泵抑制剂可能会降低病情较轻患者的 90 天死亡率(RR,0.89;95% CI,0.80-0.98),而可能会增加病情较重患者的死亡率(RR,1.08;95% CI,0.96-1.20]。质子泵抑制剂可能对肺炎没有影响,对艰难梭菌感染几乎没有影响(低确定性):高确定性证据支持质子泵抑制剂与上消化道出血减少有关。质子泵抑制剂对死亡率的影响很小或没有影响,尽管病情较轻患者的死亡率可能会降低,而病情较重患者的死亡率可能会升高。(PROSPERO 编号 CRD42023461695)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Pressure Targets for Adults with Vasodilatory Shock - An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. BNC210, an α7 Nicotinic Receptor Modulator, in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. A Meta-Analysis of Levofloxacin for Contacts of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Treating Patients, Not P Values. A 50-Year-Old Man with Left-Sided Weakness and Difficulty Speaking Clearly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1