NEJM evidence最新文献

Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a serious, debilitating, and prevalent psychiatric condition occurring in people who are traumatized and experience intense, disturbing thoughts and feelings that persist. BNC210 is a novel α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-negative allosteric modulator developed to treat PTSD.

Methods: ATTUNE was a randomized, double-blind, phase 2b, placebo-controlled trial. Patients between 18 and 75 years of age with a current PTSD diagnosis and a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition) (CAPS-5) total symptom severity score of 30 or more were eligible (range: 0 to 80; in all scales used in this trial a higher score indicates a more severe condition). We randomly assigned patients 1:1 to a BNC210 dose of 900 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary end point was a change from baseline to week 12 in CAPS-5 total score for BNC210 versus placebo.

Results: In the modified intent-to-treat population (n=182), an improvement in the CAPS-5 total score was observed with BNC210 compared with placebo (least squares [LS] mean difference: -4.03; Cohen's d effect size: 0.40; P=0.048) at week 12. A LS mean difference in CAPS-5 score of -4.11 was observed as early as week 4. The LS mean difference to week 12 for depressive symptoms measured on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (range: 0 to 60; minimal clinically important difference [MCID] ≥2]) was -3.19 and for sleep measured on the Insomnia Severity Index (range: 0 to 28; MCID 6) was -2.19. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 70 (66.7%) patients in the BNC210 group and 56 (53.8%) in the placebo group, most commonly headache, nausea, fatigue, and hepatic enzyme elevations. In the BNC210 treatment group, 21 patients withdrew from treatment for AEs, while 10 did so in the placebo group. There were no serious AEs or deaths reported for the BNC210 group.

Conclusions: BNC210 improved PTSD symptom severity at week 12 with indications of effect as early as week 4. Our trial establishes equipoise for additional larger trials that are needed to determine the clinical utility of BNC210 for the treatment of PTSD. (Funded by Bionomics Limited; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04951076.).

Background: Data from randomized trials evaluating the effectiveness of tuberculosis (TB) preventive treatment for contacts of multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB are lacking. Two recently published randomized trials that did not achieve statistical significance provide the opportunity for a meta-analysis.

Methods: We conducted combined analyses of two phase 3 trials of levofloxacin MDR-TB preventive treatment - Levofloxacin for the Prevention of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (VQUIN) trial and the Levofloxacin preventive treatment in children exposed to MDR-TB (TB-CHAMP) trial. Following MDR-TB household exposure, VQUIN enrolled mainly adults in Vietnam; TB-CHAMP enrolled mainly young children in South Africa. Random assignment in both trials was 1:1 at the household level to daily levofloxacin or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome was incident TB by 54 weeks. We estimated the treatment effect overall using individual participant data meta-analysis.

Results: The VQUIN trial (n=2041) randomly assigned 1023 participants to levofloxacin and 1018 participants to placebo; TB-CHAMP (n=922) assigned 453 participants to levofloxacin and 469 participants to placebo. Median age was 40 years (interquartile range 28 to 52 years) in VQUIN and 2.8 years (interquartile range 1.3 to 4.2 years) in TB-CHAMP. Overall, 8 levofloxacin-group participants developed TB by 54 weeks versus 21 placebo-group participants; the relative difference in cumulative incidence was 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.92; P=0.03). No association was observed between levofloxacin and grade 3 or above adverse events (risk ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.65). Musculoskeletal events of any grade occurred more frequently in the levofloxacin group (risk ratio 6.36, 95% CI 4.30 to 9.42), but not among children under 10 years of age. Overall, four levofloxacin-group participants and three placebo-group participants had grade 3 events.

Conclusions: In this meta-analysis of two randomized trials, levofloxacin was associated with a 60% relative reduction in TB incidence among adult and child household MDR-TB contacts, but with an increased risk of musculoskeletal adverse events. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, UNITAID, and others.).

Background: We sought to estimate whether a lower mean arterial blood pressure target, compared with a higher mean arterial blood pressure target, reduced 90-day all-cause mortality among critically ill adult patients with vasodilatory shock.

Methods: We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of distinct thresholds of mean arterial blood pressure to guide vasopressor support among critically ill adults identified in a systematic literature search. The main exposure was a lower mean arterial pressure target compared with a higher mean arterial pressure target (including usual care). The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. We used a Bayesian random effects log-binomial model to estimate risk ratios with 95% credible intervals (CrIs).

Results: Between 2010 and 2019, 3352 patients were randomly assigned in three trials (SEPSISPAM, OVATION pilot trial, and 65-Trial) across 103 hospitals from the United Kingdom, France, and Canada. When compared with a higher mean arterial blood pressure target or usual care, the risk ratio for 90-day all-cause mortality associated with a lower blood pressure target was 0.93 (95% CrI, 0.76 to 1.07; low certainty, posterior probability of benefit 87%). Results were consistent across multiple secondary and sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for prognostically important baseline covariates and alternative modeling techniques. Multiple approaches to evaluate the heterogeneity of treatment effect did not identify any subgroups that may potentially benefit from higher mean arterial blood pressure targets.

Conclusions: Targeting a lower mean arterial blood pressure for vasopressor therapy in critically ill patients with vasodilatory shock possibly reduced 90-day all-cause mortality. However, the certainty of evidence is low, and this analysis does not exclude the possibility that lower targets may cause harm overall.

Background: Older adults with type 1 diabetes are at risk for serious hypoglycemia. Automated insulin delivery can reduce risk but has not been sufficiently evaluated in this population.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized crossover trial in adults older than or equal to 65 years of age with type 1 diabetes. Participants completed three 12-week periods of using hybrid closed loop, predictive low-glucose suspend, and sensor-augmented pump insulin delivery in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the percentage of time with continuous glucose monitoring glucose values less than 70 mg/dl.

Results: Eighty-two participants between 65 and 86 years of age were randomly assigned: 45% were female; the baseline mean (±SD) glycated hemoglobin level was 7.2±0.9%; and the baseline percentage of time with glucose values less than 70 mg/dl was 2.49±1.78%. In the sensor-augmented pump, hybrid closed-loop, and predictive low-glucose suspend periods, percentages of time with glucose less than 70 mg/dl were 2.57±1.54%, 1.58±0.95%, and 1.67±0.96%, respectively. Compared with the sensor-augmented pump results, the mean difference with the hybrid closed-loop system was -1.05 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.48 to -0.73 percentage points; P<0.001) and with the predictive low-glucose suspend system it was -0.93 percentage points (95% CI, -1.27 to -0.66 percentage points; P<0.001). Comparing a hybrid closed-loop system with a sensor-augmented pump, time in the range 70 to 180 mg/dl changed by 8.9 percentage points (95% CI, 7.4 to 10.4 percentage points) and the glycated hemoglobin level changed by 0.2 percentage points (95% CI, -0.3 to -0.1 percentage points). Serious adverse events were uncommon. Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 4% or less of participants; there were two hospitalizations for diabetic ketoacidosis.

Conclusions: In older adults with type 1 diabetes, automated insulin delivery decreased hypoglycemia compared with sensor-augmented pump delivery. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04016662.).