Danielle Smith, Rupa Garikipati, Kristen Bastug, James R Broach, Lisa Schneper, Kathryn Sheldon, Jasmine Smith, Marwan Osman, Steven J Schiff, Jessica E Ericson
AbstractInvasive infections due to Paenibacillus species pose a serious risk to young infants and have a high risk of neurologic sequelae. This report describes two infants with severe neurologic manifestations secondary to Paenibacillus dendritiformis infection who were recently identified in the United States. Clinicians who care for young infants should be aware of this emerging infection.
{"title":"<i>Paenibacillus dendritiformis</i> as a Cause of Destructive Meningitis in Infants.","authors":"Danielle Smith, Rupa Garikipati, Kristen Bastug, James R Broach, Lisa Schneper, Kathryn Sheldon, Jasmine Smith, Marwan Osman, Steven J Schiff, Jessica E Ericson","doi":"10.1056/EVIDpha2500297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDpha2500297","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractInvasive infections due to <i>Paenibacillus</i> species pose a serious risk to young infants and have a high risk of neurologic sequelae. This report describes two infants with severe neurologic manifestations secondary to <i>Paenibacillus dendritiformis</i> infection who were recently identified in the United States. Clinicians who care for young infants should be aware of this emerging infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDpha2500297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146115237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-22DOI: 10.1056/EVIDoa2500217
Vignan Yogendrakumar, Anna H Balabanski, Hannah Johns, Leonid Churilov, Chloe A Mutimer, James Barker, Nicola K Parsons, Soo Jeong Shin, James Beharry, Louise Weir, Nawaf Yassi, Henry Zhao, Alex Warwick, Skye Coote, Francesca Langenberg, Leigh Branagan, Waseem Siddiqi, Grant Hocking, Felix C Ng, Lauren M Sanders, Philip M C Choi, Tissa Wijeratne, Douglas E Crompton, Henry Ma, Geoffrey Cloud, Bruce C V Campbell, Geoffrey A Donnan, Stephen M Davis
Background: Mobile stroke units (MSUs) accelerate prehospital acute stroke care and improve outcomes. Both onboard and telemedicine neurologist models of care are used but have not been directly compared.
Methods: MSU-TELEMED was a randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial comparing onboard neurologist care to a telemedicine care model for people presenting to an MSU with suspected stroke. MSU care was prospectively randomized by day to onboard versus telemedicine care. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite outcome using a win-odds approach that prioritized: (1) safety, (2) scene-to-treatment-decision time, and (3) percentage of the total case time the neurologist spent in direct care (higher values denote better resource use). Every participant in each group was compared to those in the other, resulting in a "win/tie/loss" distribution for telemedicine compared to onboard.
Results: A total of 275 participants were assigned to telemedicine (n=135) or onboard (n=140) neurologist care groups. The primary outcome of win/tie/loss distribution favored the telemedicine model (76%/4%/20%) with an adjusted win odds of 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-5.1). Safety events were similar (13% telemedicine vs. 12% onboard, risk ratio 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.8). Median scene-to-treatment-decision time was 19 minutes in the telemedicine group and 13 minutes in the onboard group (adjusted difference in median time 4 minutes; 95% CI, 1.9-5.9). The median percentage of the neurologist's time directly involved in patient care was 100% in the telemedicine group and 33% in the onboard group (adjusted difference in median percentage 63 percentage points; 95% CI, 53-74).
Conclusions: Compared to an onboard model, an MSU telemedicine model of care was superior based on a composite hierarchical outcome of safety, scene-to-treatment-decision time, and percentage of the neurologist's time spent in direct care. (Funded by the Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation and the Medical Research Future Fund "Golden Hour"; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05991310.).
背景:移动脑卒中单元(msu)加速院前急性脑卒中护理并改善预后。船上和远程医疗的神经科医生的护理模式都被使用,但没有直接比较。方法:MSU- telemed是一项随机、开放标签、盲终点试验,比较船上神经科医生护理和远程医疗护理模式对MSU疑似中风患者的影响。MSU护理前瞻性地按日随机分为船上护理和远程医疗护理。主要结果是采用胜率法的分层复合结果,优先考虑:(1)安全性,(2)从现场到治疗的决策时间,(3)神经科医生在直接护理中花费的总病例时间的百分比(数值越高表示资源利用越好)。每一组的每个参与者都与另一组的参与者进行了比较,结果是与船上相比,远程医疗的“赢/平/输”分配。结果:共有275名参与者被分配到远程医疗组(n=135)或船上神经病学家护理组(n=140)。赢/平/输分布的主要结果有利于远程医疗模式(76%/4%/20%),调整后的获胜几率为3.5(95%置信区间[CI], 2.4-5.1)。安全事件相似(13%远程医疗vs 12%船上医疗,风险比0.9;95% CI, 0.5-1.8)。远程医疗组从现场到治疗决策的中位时间为19分钟,车载组为13分钟(调整后的中位时间差异为4分钟;95% CI, 1.9-5.9)。远程医疗组神经科医生直接参与患者护理的时间中位数百分比为100%,船上组为33%(调整后中位数百分比差异为63个百分点;95% CI, 53-74)。结论:与车载模型相比,MSU远程医疗模型在安全性、场景到治疗决策时间和神经科医生在直接护理中花费的时间百分比的复合分层结果上优于车载模型。(由Sylvia and Charles Viertel慈善基金会和医学研究未来基金“黄金时间”资助;ClinicalTrials.gov号码:NCT05991310.)
{"title":"A Randomized Trial of Telemedicine Models of Care on a Mobile Stroke Unit.","authors":"Vignan Yogendrakumar, Anna H Balabanski, Hannah Johns, Leonid Churilov, Chloe A Mutimer, James Barker, Nicola K Parsons, Soo Jeong Shin, James Beharry, Louise Weir, Nawaf Yassi, Henry Zhao, Alex Warwick, Skye Coote, Francesca Langenberg, Leigh Branagan, Waseem Siddiqi, Grant Hocking, Felix C Ng, Lauren M Sanders, Philip M C Choi, Tissa Wijeratne, Douglas E Crompton, Henry Ma, Geoffrey Cloud, Bruce C V Campbell, Geoffrey A Donnan, Stephen M Davis","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500217","DOIUrl":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500217","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile stroke units (MSUs) accelerate prehospital acute stroke care and improve outcomes. Both onboard and telemedicine neurologist models of care are used but have not been directly compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MSU-TELEMED was a randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial comparing onboard neurologist care to a telemedicine care model for people presenting to an MSU with suspected stroke. MSU care was prospectively randomized by day to onboard versus telemedicine care. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite outcome using a win-odds approach that prioritized: (1) safety, (2) scene-to-treatment-decision time, and (3) percentage of the total case time the neurologist spent in direct care (higher values denote better resource use). Every participant in each group was compared to those in the other, resulting in a \"win/tie/loss\" distribution for telemedicine compared to onboard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 275 participants were assigned to telemedicine (n=135) or onboard (n=140) neurologist care groups. The primary outcome of win/tie/loss distribution favored the telemedicine model (76%/4%/20%) with an adjusted win odds of 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-5.1). Safety events were similar (13% telemedicine vs. 12% onboard, risk ratio 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.8). Median scene-to-treatment-decision time was 19 minutes in the telemedicine group and 13 minutes in the onboard group (adjusted difference in median time 4 minutes; 95% CI, 1.9-5.9). The median percentage of the neurologist's time directly involved in patient care was 100% in the telemedicine group and 33% in the onboard group (adjusted difference in median percentage 63 percentage points; 95% CI, 53-74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to an onboard model, an MSU telemedicine model of care was superior based on a composite hierarchical outcome of safety, scene-to-treatment-decision time, and percentage of the neurologist's time spent in direct care. (Funded by the Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation and the Medical Research Future Fund \"Golden Hour\"; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05991310.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDoa2500217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145812314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1056/EVIDe2500328
Ahizechukwu C Eke
{"title":"Precision Immunomodulation in Pregnancy - Lessons from Nipocalimab.","authors":"Ahizechukwu C Eke","doi":"10.1056/EVIDe2500328","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDe2500328","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"5 2","pages":"EVIDe2500328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146054312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1056/EVIDpha2500069
Anthony C Fries, Kayla M Septer, William E Gruner, Zhaodong Liang, Angelia A Eick-Cost, Jeffrey W Thervil, Dara A Russell, Daniel F Ewing, Laurie S Demarcus, Appavu K Sundaram, Tamara R Hartless, Bismark Kwaah, Deanna M Muehleman, Jimmaline Hardy, M Shayne Gallaway
AbstractThe influenza virus constantly evolves through antigenic shift and drift, requiring annual review to inform the development of seasonal influenza vaccines. The Department of Defense Global Respiratory Pathogen Surveillance Program and Global Emerging Infections Surveillance program-funded partner laboratories perform routine respiratory pathogen surveillance across a wide-reaching global network of service members and their beneficiaries, U.S. civilians, and some foreign national populations. This report describes the influenza viruses circulating during the 2024-2025 influenza season.
{"title":"Influenza Virus Characteristics in Department of Defense Populations, 2024-2025.","authors":"Anthony C Fries, Kayla M Septer, William E Gruner, Zhaodong Liang, Angelia A Eick-Cost, Jeffrey W Thervil, Dara A Russell, Daniel F Ewing, Laurie S Demarcus, Appavu K Sundaram, Tamara R Hartless, Bismark Kwaah, Deanna M Muehleman, Jimmaline Hardy, M Shayne Gallaway","doi":"10.1056/EVIDpha2500069","DOIUrl":"10.1056/EVIDpha2500069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractThe influenza virus constantly evolves through antigenic shift and drift, requiring annual review to inform the development of seasonal influenza vaccines. The Department of Defense Global Respiratory Pathogen Surveillance Program and Global Emerging Infections Surveillance program-funded partner laboratories perform routine respiratory pathogen surveillance across a wide-reaching global network of service members and their beneficiaries, U.S. civilians, and some foreign national populations. This report describes the influenza viruses circulating during the 2024-2025 influenza season.</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDpha2500069"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1056/EVIDra2500218
Katherine W Saylor, Sonja A Rasmussen, Michael F Murray
AbstractPopulation screening is a long-established tool for effectively identifying disease risk when existing approaches are inadequate for optimizing care. DNA-based population screening (DNAPS) in adult populations has the power to identify individuals at an increased genetic risk of cancer, heart disease, and other health conditions, thus allowing for evidence-based interventions to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. One example of the type of risk identified in such screening is BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated cancer risk, where current risk-identification strategies have been shown to miss greater than 70% of at-risk individuals. Since the first DNA-based screening pilot in adults was initiated in 2008, a growing number of other large-scale projects carrying out DNAPS in adults have followed, and, in aggregate, these projects are engaging millions of people around the world. There are features of DNAPS that make this population screening approach distinct from other population health screens, such as the scale of the datasets that will be created and stored for each participant. This review focuses on an examination of DNAPS in the context of other population health screens, the state of the evidence for this screening approach, and gaps to be addressed to optimize implementation of this population screening approach.
{"title":"DNA-Based Population Screening for Adults.","authors":"Katherine W Saylor, Sonja A Rasmussen, Michael F Murray","doi":"10.1056/EVIDra2500218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDra2500218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractPopulation screening is a long-established tool for effectively identifying disease risk when existing approaches are inadequate for optimizing care. DNA-based population screening (DNAPS) in adult populations has the power to identify individuals at an increased genetic risk of cancer, heart disease, and other health conditions, thus allowing for evidence-based interventions to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. One example of the type of risk identified in such screening is <i>BRCA1</i>- and <i>BRCA2</i>-associated cancer risk, where current risk-identification strategies have been shown to miss greater than 70% of at-risk individuals. Since the first DNA-based screening pilot in adults was initiated in 2008, a growing number of other large-scale projects carrying out DNAPS in adults have followed, and, in aggregate, these projects are engaging millions of people around the world. There are features of DNAPS that make this population screening approach distinct from other population health screens, such as the scale of the datasets that will be created and stored for each participant. This review focuses on an examination of DNAPS in the context of other population health screens, the state of the evidence for this screening approach, and gaps to be addressed to optimize implementation of this population screening approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"5 2","pages":"EVIDra2500218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1056/EVIDoa2500190
Kirsi-Marja Zitting, Katherine R Gilmore, Brandon J Lockyer, Eileen B Leary, Wei Wang, Nicolas C Issa, Stuart F Quan, Jonathan S Williams, Jeanne F Duffy, Charles A Czeisler
Background: More individuals work early-morning shifts than night shifts, yet investigations into the treatment of shift work disorder (SWD) in this population are lacking.
Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of solriamfetol, a selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, for treating excessive sleepiness in 78 early-morning shift workers (shift starting between 3 and 7 a.m.) with excessive sleepiness associated with SWD. The primary outcome was change in objective sleepiness, as measured by sleep latency on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (longer latency reflects less sleepiness). Secondary outcomes included subjective sleepiness measured by the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (range 1-9, with higher values indicating greater sleepiness) as well as clinician- and patient-assessed change in clinical condition, using the Clinical Global Impression of Change and Patient Global Impression of Change questionnaires (scores range from 1-7 for both scales, but higher scores indicate worse condition for the clinical scale and improved condition for the patient scale).
Results: After 4 weeks, patients treated with solriamfetol were significantly less sleepy than those treated with placebo (9.4-minute longer sleep latency; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7 to 13.0; P<0.001). Solriamfetol treatment was associated with changed subjective sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale difference, -1.2; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.7), and changed clinician (odds ratio 3.7; 95% CI, 1.3 to 10.4) and patient (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.5 to 11.6) ratings. Overall, 55% of patients who received any treatment with solriamfetol and 63% of patients receiving placebo reported any adverse event; the most common adverse events were headache and nausea.
Conclusions: In this randomized trial of a treatment for excessive sleepiness in early-morning shift workers with SWD, solriamfetol significantly improved sleepiness compared with placebo. (Funded by Axsome Therapeutics and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04788953.).
{"title":"Solriamfetol for Excessive Sleepiness in Early-Morning Shift Work Disorder.","authors":"Kirsi-Marja Zitting, Katherine R Gilmore, Brandon J Lockyer, Eileen B Leary, Wei Wang, Nicolas C Issa, Stuart F Quan, Jonathan S Williams, Jeanne F Duffy, Charles A Czeisler","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2500190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More individuals work early-morning shifts than night shifts, yet investigations into the treatment of shift work disorder (SWD) in this population are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of solriamfetol, a selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, for treating excessive sleepiness in 78 early-morning shift workers (shift starting between 3 and 7 a.m.) with excessive sleepiness associated with SWD. The primary outcome was change in objective sleepiness, as measured by sleep latency on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (longer latency reflects less sleepiness). Secondary outcomes included subjective sleepiness measured by the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (range 1-9, with higher values indicating greater sleepiness) as well as clinician- and patient-assessed change in clinical condition, using the Clinical Global Impression of Change and Patient Global Impression of Change questionnaires (scores range from 1-7 for both scales, but higher scores indicate worse condition for the clinical scale and improved condition for the patient scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 4 weeks, patients treated with solriamfetol were significantly less sleepy than those treated with placebo (9.4-minute longer sleep latency; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7 to 13.0; P<0.001). Solriamfetol treatment was associated with changed subjective sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale difference, -1.2; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.7), and changed clinician (odds ratio 3.7; 95% CI, 1.3 to 10.4) and patient (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.5 to 11.6) ratings. Overall, 55% of patients who received any treatment with solriamfetol and 63% of patients receiving placebo reported any adverse event; the most common adverse events were headache and nausea.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this randomized trial of a treatment for excessive sleepiness in early-morning shift workers with SWD, solriamfetol significantly improved sleepiness compared with placebo. (Funded by Axsome Therapeutics and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04788953.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"5 2","pages":"EVIDoa2500190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146054537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1056/EVIDe2500327
James P Allinson, Jadwiga A Wedzicha
{"title":"Aiming to Objectively Identify the Experience of Chronic Bronchitis.","authors":"James P Allinson, Jadwiga A Wedzicha","doi":"10.1056/EVIDe2500327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDe2500327","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"5 2","pages":"EVIDe2500327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1056/EVIDe2500330
Katherine A Dudley
{"title":"Bright and Early…Now Also Awake!","authors":"Katherine A Dudley","doi":"10.1056/EVIDe2500330","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDe2500330","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"5 2","pages":"EVIDe2500330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1056/EVIDe2500340
Lee H Schwamm
{"title":"Telemedicine Care on a Mobile Stroke Unit - Time and Tide Wait for No Man.","authors":"Lee H Schwamm","doi":"10.1056/EVIDe2500340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDe2500340","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"5 2","pages":"EVIDe2500340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1056/EVIDoa2500097
Derek P de Winter, Kenneth J Moise, Leona E Ling, Dick Oepkes, Eleonor Tiblad, E J T Joanne Verweij, John Smoleniec, Ulrich J Sachs, Gregor Bein, Mark D Kilby, Russell S Miller, Roland Devlieger, James B Streisand, Robbert G M Bredius, Joseph Cafone, Edwin Lam, Jocelyn H Leu, Arpana Mirza, Robert M Nelson, Valerie Smith, Lisa B Schwartz, May Lee Tjoa, Shumyla Saeed-Khawaja, Yosuke Komatsu, Enrico Lopriore
Background: Antenatal treatment with nipocalimab, a neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blocker, delayed or prevented fetal anemia, as compared with a historical benchmark, in a phase 2 study of early-onset severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). We report on the fetal and neonatal pharmacokinetics of nipocalimab and infant immunity through 96 weeks after birth.
Methods: The UNITY study was a single-group, open-label study assessing pregnant individuals at high risk of early-onset severe HDFN treated with weekly intravenous nipocalimab (30 or 45 mg/kg) from 14 to 35 weeks' gestation, unless discontinued for safety-related stopping criteria or intrauterine transfusion initiation. Pharmacokinetics were assessed in maternal, fetal, and infant blood and colostrum or breast milk; FcRn receptor occupancy and immunoglobulin G (IgG) were measured in neonatal and maternal blood; and infant IgG and safety were monitored through 96 weeks after birth.
Results: Safety analysis included 12 live-born infants from 13 pregnancies (one fetal loss occurred following intrauterine transfusion complications). Nipocalimab concentrations were maintained in maternal participants at pharmacologically active concentrations (greater than 10 μg/ml) during the weekly dosing intervals, but were observed at low concentrations (10 μg/ml or less) in one of four fetal cordocenteses (0.04 μg/ml), one of 11 cord blood samples (0.7 μg/ml), three of seven colostrum samples (less than 4 μg/ml), and two of nine breast milk samples (less than 2 μg/ml). Low infant IgG at birth (cord blood median, 175 mg/dl; range, 92-941) reached levels consistent with a physiologic nadir by 24 weeks after birth (median, 273 mg/dl; range, 153-429) and recovered to normal range (with one exception) between 16 and 96 weeks (median, 762 mg/dl; range, 407-925). Infectious adverse events were primarily mild to moderate and typical for early childhood. Protective titers to age-appropriate vaccinations (diphtheria and tetanus) were observed in six of seven infants at or before 96 weeks.
Conclusions: In this cohort of 12 live-born infants, antenatal treatment with nipocalimab resulted in low levels of detectable drug in fetal, neonatal, and infant samples. Treatment was associated with low IgG levels at birth; however, unusual or unexpected childhood illnesses or impaired vaccine responses were not observed. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03842189.).
{"title":"Infant Immunity after Maternal Nipocalimab in Severe Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn.","authors":"Derek P de Winter, Kenneth J Moise, Leona E Ling, Dick Oepkes, Eleonor Tiblad, E J T Joanne Verweij, John Smoleniec, Ulrich J Sachs, Gregor Bein, Mark D Kilby, Russell S Miller, Roland Devlieger, James B Streisand, Robbert G M Bredius, Joseph Cafone, Edwin Lam, Jocelyn H Leu, Arpana Mirza, Robert M Nelson, Valerie Smith, Lisa B Schwartz, May Lee Tjoa, Shumyla Saeed-Khawaja, Yosuke Komatsu, Enrico Lopriore","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500097","DOIUrl":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antenatal treatment with nipocalimab, a neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blocker, delayed or prevented fetal anemia, as compared with a historical benchmark, in a phase 2 study of early-onset severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). We report on the fetal and neonatal pharmacokinetics of nipocalimab and infant immunity through 96 weeks after birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The UNITY study was a single-group, open-label study assessing pregnant individuals at high risk of early-onset severe HDFN treated with weekly intravenous nipocalimab (30 or 45 mg/kg) from 14 to 35 weeks' gestation, unless discontinued for safety-related stopping criteria or intrauterine transfusion initiation. Pharmacokinetics were assessed in maternal, fetal, and infant blood and colostrum or breast milk; FcRn receptor occupancy and immunoglobulin G (IgG) were measured in neonatal and maternal blood; and infant IgG and safety were monitored through 96 weeks after birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Safety analysis included 12 live-born infants from 13 pregnancies (one fetal loss occurred following intrauterine transfusion complications). Nipocalimab concentrations were maintained in maternal participants at pharmacologically active concentrations (greater than 10 μg/ml) during the weekly dosing intervals, but were observed at low concentrations (10 μg/ml or less) in one of four fetal cordocenteses (0.04 μg/ml), one of 11 cord blood samples (0.7 μg/ml), three of seven colostrum samples (less than 4 μg/ml), and two of nine breast milk samples (less than 2 μg/ml). Low infant IgG at birth (cord blood median, 175 mg/dl; range, 92-941) reached levels consistent with a physiologic nadir by 24 weeks after birth (median, 273 mg/dl; range, 153-429) and recovered to normal range (with one exception) between 16 and 96 weeks (median, 762 mg/dl; range, 407-925). Infectious adverse events were primarily mild to moderate and typical for early childhood. Protective titers to age-appropriate vaccinations (diphtheria and tetanus) were observed in six of seven infants at or before 96 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of 12 live-born infants, antenatal treatment with nipocalimab resulted in low levels of detectable drug in fetal, neonatal, and infant samples. Treatment was associated with low IgG levels at birth; however, unusual or unexpected childhood illnesses or impaired vaccine responses were not observed. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03842189.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"5 2","pages":"EVIDoa2500097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}