Advancing Diagnostic Accuracy and Quality of Patient Care Through the Implementation of a Flow Cytometry Quality Assurance Program.

Dylan Wang, Hong Fang, Chi Young Ok, Jeffrey L Jorgensen, L Jeffrey Medeiros, Wei Wang, Sa A Wang
{"title":"Advancing Diagnostic Accuracy and Quality of Patient Care Through the Implementation of a Flow Cytometry Quality Assurance Program.","authors":"Dylan Wang, Hong Fang, Chi Young Ok, Jeffrey L Jorgensen, L Jeffrey Medeiros, Wei Wang, Sa A Wang","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0020-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Flow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis plays an important role in the diagnosis, classification, and disease monitoring of hematologic neoplasms. The interpretation of flow cytometry testing can be challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To explore ways to improve diagnostic accuracy and in turn enhance the quality of patient care.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A flow cytometry quality assurance (QA) program was developed. Cases from various complex flow cytometry panels were randomly selected and cross-reviewed. The outcomes of the QA review were categorized into 3 groups: complete agreement, minor discrepancy, and major discrepancy. Each discrepancy underwent a process of documentation, discussion, and resolution. Here we summarize our 3 years of experience with this program.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>In total, 6166 cases were evaluated; 6028 cases (97.7%) showed complete concordance, 120 cases (2.0%) showed minor discrepancies, and 18 cases (0.3%) showed major discrepancies. Among the top 5 panels evaluated, the panel evaluating mature T-cell abnormalities showed the highest rate of discrepancy, whereas the panel for evaluation of myelodysplastic syndromes showed the lowest discrepancy rate. When analyzing the trends of concordance and discrepancy over time, we observed a statistically significant decrease in discrepancy rate over time, from 4% at the beginning of the 6-month period to 1.5% in the final 6-month period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>The overall concordance rate was 97.7%. The remaining 2.3% of cases showed discrepancies that required a correction, underscoring the value and necessity of having a QA program. The overall discrepancy rates exhibited a gradual decline over time, indicative of the positive impact of the QA program on enhancing diagnostic competency and accuracy over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0020-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Flow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis plays an important role in the diagnosis, classification, and disease monitoring of hematologic neoplasms. The interpretation of flow cytometry testing can be challenging.

Objective.—: To explore ways to improve diagnostic accuracy and in turn enhance the quality of patient care.

Design.—: A flow cytometry quality assurance (QA) program was developed. Cases from various complex flow cytometry panels were randomly selected and cross-reviewed. The outcomes of the QA review were categorized into 3 groups: complete agreement, minor discrepancy, and major discrepancy. Each discrepancy underwent a process of documentation, discussion, and resolution. Here we summarize our 3 years of experience with this program.

Results.—: In total, 6166 cases were evaluated; 6028 cases (97.7%) showed complete concordance, 120 cases (2.0%) showed minor discrepancies, and 18 cases (0.3%) showed major discrepancies. Among the top 5 panels evaluated, the panel evaluating mature T-cell abnormalities showed the highest rate of discrepancy, whereas the panel for evaluation of myelodysplastic syndromes showed the lowest discrepancy rate. When analyzing the trends of concordance and discrepancy over time, we observed a statistically significant decrease in discrepancy rate over time, from 4% at the beginning of the 6-month period to 1.5% in the final 6-month period.

Conclusions.—: The overall concordance rate was 97.7%. The remaining 2.3% of cases showed discrepancies that required a correction, underscoring the value and necessity of having a QA program. The overall discrepancy rates exhibited a gradual decline over time, indicative of the positive impact of the QA program on enhancing diagnostic competency and accuracy over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过实施流式细胞仪质量保证计划,提高诊断准确性和患者护理质量。
背景流式细胞术免疫分型分析在血液肿瘤的诊断、分类和疾病监测中发挥着重要作用。流式细胞仪检测的解释可能具有挑战性:探索提高诊断准确性的方法,进而提高患者护理质量:设计:制定流式细胞仪质量保证(QA)计划。从各种复杂的流式细胞仪面板中随机抽取病例并进行交叉审查。质量保证审查结果分为三类:完全一致、轻微差异和重大差异。每种差异都要经过记录、讨论和解决的过程。在此,我们总结了 3 年来的经验:共评估了 6166 个病例;6028 个病例(97.7%)显示完全一致,120 个病例(2.0%)显示轻微差异,18 个病例(0.3%)显示严重差异。在前 5 个评估小组中,评估成熟 T 细胞异常的小组差异率最高,而评估骨髓增生异常综合征的小组差异率最低。在分析随着时间推移的一致性和差异趋势时,我们观察到差异率随着时间的推移出现了统计学意义上的显著下降,从 6 个月初期的 4% 降至最后 6 个月的 1.5%:结论:总体吻合率为 97.7%。其余 2.3% 的病例出现了需要纠正的差异,这凸显了质量保证计划的价值和必要性。随着时间的推移,总体差异率呈逐渐下降趋势,这表明质量保证计划对提高诊断能力和准确性产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analytical and Clinical Validation of the Oncomine Dx Target Test to Assess HER2 Mutation Status in Tumor Tissue Samples From Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in the DESTINY-Lung01 and DESTINY-Lung02 Studies. Ethical and Regulatory Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pathology. Reduced Plasma Selenoprotein P Is Associated With Type I Antithrombin Deficiency and a Prothrombotic State. The Anatomic Pathology Hospitalist Model. Histologic Features of Liver Injury Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Messenger RNA Vaccines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1