Customizable, biocompatible implants for dorsal nasal augmentation: An in vivo pilot study of eight polylactic acid scaffold designs

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.37764
Gillian M. O'Connell, Nicholas Vernice, Alicia A. Matavosian, Leigh Slyker, Ryan J. Bender, Xue Dong, Lawrence J. Bonassar, James Shin, Jason A. Spector
{"title":"Customizable, biocompatible implants for dorsal nasal augmentation: An in vivo pilot study of eight polylactic acid scaffold designs","authors":"Gillian M. O'Connell,&nbsp;Nicholas Vernice,&nbsp;Alicia A. Matavosian,&nbsp;Leigh Slyker,&nbsp;Ryan J. Bender,&nbsp;Xue Dong,&nbsp;Lawrence J. Bonassar,&nbsp;James Shin,&nbsp;Jason A. Spector","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.37764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Augmentation of the nasal dorsum often requires implantation of structural material. Existing methods include autologous, cadaveric or alloplastic materials and injectable hydrogels. Each of these options is associated with considerable limitations. There is an ongoing need for precise and versatile implants that produce long-lasting craniofacial augmentation. Four separate polylactic acid (PLA) dorsal nasal implant designs were 3D-printed. Two implants had internal PLA rebar of differing porosities and two were designed as “shells” of differing porosities. Shell designs were implanted without infill or with either minced or zested processed decellularized ovine cartilage infill to serve as a “biologic rebar”, yielding eight total treatment groups. Scaffolds were implanted heterotopically on rat dorsa (<i>N</i> = 4 implants per rat) for explant after 3, 6, and 12 months followed by volumetric, histopathologic, and biomechanical analysis. Low porosity implants with either minced cartilage or PLA rebar infill had superior volume retention across all timepoints. Overall, histopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis showed a resolving inflammatory response with an M1/M2 ratio consistently favoring tissue regeneration over the study course. However, xenograft cartilage showed areas of degradation and pro-inflammatory infiltrate contributing to volume and contour loss over time. Biomechanical analysis revealed all constructs had equilibrium and instantaneous moduli higher than human septal cartilage controls. Biocompatible, degradable polymer implants can induce healthy neotissue ingrowth resulting in guided soft tissue augmentation and offer a simple, customizable and clinically-translatable alternative to existing craniofacial soft tissue augmentation materials. PLA-only implants may be superior to combination PLA and xenograft implants due to contour irregularities associated with cartilage degradation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"112 12","pages":"2086-2097"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.37764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Augmentation of the nasal dorsum often requires implantation of structural material. Existing methods include autologous, cadaveric or alloplastic materials and injectable hydrogels. Each of these options is associated with considerable limitations. There is an ongoing need for precise and versatile implants that produce long-lasting craniofacial augmentation. Four separate polylactic acid (PLA) dorsal nasal implant designs were 3D-printed. Two implants had internal PLA rebar of differing porosities and two were designed as “shells” of differing porosities. Shell designs were implanted without infill or with either minced or zested processed decellularized ovine cartilage infill to serve as a “biologic rebar”, yielding eight total treatment groups. Scaffolds were implanted heterotopically on rat dorsa (N = 4 implants per rat) for explant after 3, 6, and 12 months followed by volumetric, histopathologic, and biomechanical analysis. Low porosity implants with either minced cartilage or PLA rebar infill had superior volume retention across all timepoints. Overall, histopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis showed a resolving inflammatory response with an M1/M2 ratio consistently favoring tissue regeneration over the study course. However, xenograft cartilage showed areas of degradation and pro-inflammatory infiltrate contributing to volume and contour loss over time. Biomechanical analysis revealed all constructs had equilibrium and instantaneous moduli higher than human septal cartilage controls. Biocompatible, degradable polymer implants can induce healthy neotissue ingrowth resulting in guided soft tissue augmentation and offer a simple, customizable and clinically-translatable alternative to existing craniofacial soft tissue augmentation materials. PLA-only implants may be superior to combination PLA and xenograft implants due to contour irregularities associated with cartilage degradation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于鼻背隆鼻的可定制生物相容性植入物:八种聚乳酸支架设计的体内试验研究。
鼻背增高通常需要植入结构材料。现有的方法包括自体、尸体或异体材料以及可注射的水凝胶。这些方法都有很大的局限性。目前,人们一直需要精确、多功能的植入物,以达到持久的颅面增高效果。我们对四种不同的聚乳酸(PLA)鼻背植入体设计进行了 3D 打印。其中两个植入体内部有不同孔隙率的聚乳酸螺纹钢筋,另两个设计成不同孔隙率的 "壳"。外壳设计在植入时不使用填充物,或使用切碎或压碎的脱细胞绵羊软骨填充物作为 "生物螺纹钢",共分为八个处理组。将脚手架异位植入大鼠背骨(每只大鼠植入 4 个脚手架),分别在 3、6 和 12 个月后取出,然后进行体积、组织病理学和生物力学分析。使用碎软骨或聚乳酸螺纹钢填充的低孔隙率植入物在所有时间点的体积保持率都较高。总体而言,组织病理学和免疫组化分析表明,在研究过程中,炎症反应正在消退,M1/M2比率始终有利于组织再生。然而,异种移植软骨出现了降解区域和促炎浸润,导致体积和轮廓随着时间的推移而减小。生物力学分析表明,所有构建物的平衡模量和瞬时模量均高于人体室间隔软骨对照组。生物相容性好、可降解的聚合物植入物能诱导健康的新组织生长,从而引导软组织增量,为现有的颅面部软组织增量材料提供了一种简单、可定制、可临床转化的替代方案。由于软骨降解会导致轮廓不规则,因此纯聚乳酸植入物可能优于聚乳酸和异种移植的组合植入物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A is an international, interdisciplinary, English-language publication of original contributions concerning studies of the preparation, performance, and evaluation of biomaterials; the chemical, physical, toxicological, and mechanical behavior of materials in physiological environments; and the response of blood and tissues to biomaterials. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on all relevant biomaterial topics including the science and technology of alloys,polymers, ceramics, and reprocessed animal and human tissues in surgery,dentistry, artificial organs, and other medical devices. The Journal also publishes articles in interdisciplinary areas such as tissue engineering and controlled release technology where biomaterials play a significant role in the performance of the medical device. The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research is the official journal of the Society for Biomaterials (USA), the Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Articles are welcomed from all scientists. Membership in the Society for Biomaterials is not a prerequisite for submission.
期刊最新文献
Soluble Proteins From Conventional and Organic Eggshell Membranes With Different Proteomic Profiles Show Similar In Vitro Biofunctions Dextran Sulfate-Modified and pH-Responsive Nanoprobes for Magnetic Resonance/Fluorescence Dual-Modality Imaging of Vulnerable Plaques Effects of Gamma Irradiation on Structural, Chemical, Bioactivity and Biocompatibility Characteristics of Bioactive Glass–Polymer Composite Film Injectable Nano-Micron AKBA Delivery Platform for Treatment of Tendinopathy in a Rat Model Tuning Surface Chemistry Impacts on Cardiac Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cell Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1