Trade-offs between clinical performance and test accessibility in tuberculosis diagnosis: a multi-country modelling approach for target product profile development.

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Lancet Global Health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00178-5
Alexandra de Nooy, Tom Ockhuisen, Alexei Korobitsyn, Shaukat A Khan, Morten Ruhwald, Nazir Ismail, Mikashmi Kohli, Brooke E Nichols
{"title":"Trade-offs between clinical performance and test accessibility in tuberculosis diagnosis: a multi-country modelling approach for target product profile development.","authors":"Alexandra de Nooy, Tom Ockhuisen, Alexei Korobitsyn, Shaukat A Khan, Morten Ruhwald, Nazir Ismail, Mikashmi Kohli, Brooke E Nichols","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00178-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis continues to be a leading cause of infectious disease mortality, and effective screening and diagnosis remains crucial. Despite progress made, diagnostic gaps remain due to poor access to diagnostic tools and testing, particularly in rural and remote areas. As such, the development of target product profiles is essential in guiding the development of new diagnostic tools, however target product profiles often lack evidence-based information and do not consider trade-offs between test accuracy and accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A simulation-based model, in the form of a decision tree, was used to map out the baseline patient tuberculosis diagnostic pathway for individuals in Kenya, South Africa, and India. The model was then used to adapt this pathway to evaluate the trade-offs between increased access to testing and varying accuracy of new tuberculosis diagnostic tools within the health-care contexts of Kenya, South Africa, and India. The model aims to support target product profile development by quantifying the impact of new diagnostics on the standard of care. The model considered three diagnostic attributes, namely sample type (sputum vs non-sputum), site of testing (point of care, near point of care, and health setting) and turnaround time.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our results indicate that per sample type, novel point-of-care tests would be the most accessible and even with lower sensitivities can achieve comparable or better case detection than the current standard of care in each country. Non-sputum diagnostics also have lower sensitivity requirements. Overall, target product profile parameters with reduced sensitivities from 70% for non-sputum and 78% for sputum tests could be accepted.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Diagnostics which bring tuberculosis tests and test results closer to the patient could reduce overall diagnostic loss despite potential reductions in sensitivity. This work provides a novel framework for guiding the future development of diagnostics, with an approach towards balancing accessibility and test performance.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-045721).</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00178-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis continues to be a leading cause of infectious disease mortality, and effective screening and diagnosis remains crucial. Despite progress made, diagnostic gaps remain due to poor access to diagnostic tools and testing, particularly in rural and remote areas. As such, the development of target product profiles is essential in guiding the development of new diagnostic tools, however target product profiles often lack evidence-based information and do not consider trade-offs between test accuracy and accessibility.

Methods: A simulation-based model, in the form of a decision tree, was used to map out the baseline patient tuberculosis diagnostic pathway for individuals in Kenya, South Africa, and India. The model was then used to adapt this pathway to evaluate the trade-offs between increased access to testing and varying accuracy of new tuberculosis diagnostic tools within the health-care contexts of Kenya, South Africa, and India. The model aims to support target product profile development by quantifying the impact of new diagnostics on the standard of care. The model considered three diagnostic attributes, namely sample type (sputum vs non-sputum), site of testing (point of care, near point of care, and health setting) and turnaround time.

Findings: Our results indicate that per sample type, novel point-of-care tests would be the most accessible and even with lower sensitivities can achieve comparable or better case detection than the current standard of care in each country. Non-sputum diagnostics also have lower sensitivity requirements. Overall, target product profile parameters with reduced sensitivities from 70% for non-sputum and 78% for sputum tests could be accepted.

Interpretation: Diagnostics which bring tuberculosis tests and test results closer to the patient could reduce overall diagnostic loss despite potential reductions in sensitivity. This work provides a novel framework for guiding the future development of diagnostics, with an approach towards balancing accessibility and test performance.

Funding: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-045721).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结核病诊断中临床表现与检验可及性之间的权衡:目标产品简介开发的多国建模方法。
背景:结核病仍然是传染病死亡的主要原因,有效的筛查和诊断仍然至关重要。尽管取得了进展,但由于难以获得诊断工具和检测,诊断差距依然存在,特别是在农村和偏远地区。因此,制定目标产品简介对于指导新诊断工具的开发至关重要,但目标产品简介往往缺乏循证信息,也没有考虑测试准确性和可及性之间的权衡:方法:采用决策树形式的模拟模型,为肯尼亚、南非和印度的患者绘制出结核病诊断路径基线图。然后,在肯尼亚、南非和印度的医疗保健环境中,利用该模型调整这一路径,以评估增加检测机会与新结核病诊断工具不同准确性之间的权衡。该模型旨在通过量化新诊断工具对医疗标准的影响来支持目标产品的开发。该模型考虑了三种诊断属性,即样本类型(痰与非痰)、检测地点(医疗点、近医疗点和医疗环境)和周转时间:我们的研究结果表明,就样本类型而言,新型护理点检测是最容易获得的,即使灵敏度较低,也能实现与各国现行护理标准相当或更好的病例检测。非痰液诊断对灵敏度的要求也较低。总体而言,非痰液检测灵敏度降低到 70% 或痰液检测灵敏度降低到 78% 的目标产品特征参数是可以接受的:尽管灵敏度可能会降低,但能使结核病检测和检测结果更贴近患者的诊断方法可减少总体诊断损失。这项研究为指导未来诊断方法的开发提供了一个新颖的框架,在可及性和检测性能之间取得了平衡:比尔及梅林达-盖茨基金会(INV-045721)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Improving Ebola virus disease outbreak control through targeted post-exposure prophylaxis. Mechanisms and causes of death after abdominal surgery in low-income and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis of the FALCON trial. Microbiology testing capacity and antimicrobial drug resistance in surgical-site infections: a post-hoc, prospective, secondary analysis of the FALCON randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries. Strengthening surgical systems in LMICs: data-driven approaches. Correction to Lancet Glob Health 2024; 12: e1278-87.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1