Microbiology testing capacity and antimicrobial drug resistance in surgical-site infections: a post-hoc, prospective, secondary analysis of the FALCON randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries.

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Lancet Global Health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00330-9
{"title":"Microbiology testing capacity and antimicrobial drug resistance in surgical-site infections: a post-hoc, prospective, secondary analysis of the FALCON randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries.","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00330-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical-site infection (SSI) is one of the most common health-care-associated infections, substantially contributing to antibiotic use. Targeted antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent SSIs and effective treatment are crucial to controlling antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aimed to describe the testing capacity and multidrug resistance (MDR) of SSI microorganisms in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis included patients undergoing abdominal surgery in seven LMICs (Benin, Ghana, India, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda, and South Africa) as part of the FALCON randomised controlled trial. Wound swabs were collected from patients diagnosed with SSI, as per US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition. Data on microorganism species and MDR, as per CDC and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control definitions, were analysed alongside hospital-level data on local microbiological practices. An adjusted analysis was performed to identify perioperative factors associated with MDR. Testing capacity was assessed by the completion of swab testing in positively diagnosed SSIs.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Dec 10, 2018, and Sept 7, 2020, 5788 patients were recruited to the FALCON trial. 1163 patients were diagnosed with an SSI, of whom 905 (77·8%) received prophylactic antibiotics before surgery. In patients with SSIs, 935 of 1163 (80·4%) did not have a wound swab; 195 were from hospitals not performing swabs (15 hospitals) and 740 were from hospitals with capacity but no swab performed (35 hospitals). Of 228 patients swabbed, 200 (88·5%) had microorganisms detected. Escherichia coli (89 of 200, 37·9%) was the most common microorganism and 116 of 200 (58·0%) patients were not covered by the perioperative prophylactic antibiotic. MDR was found in 102 of 147 (69·4%) patients for whom data were available to determine MDR status. Adjusted analysis found that appropriate prophylactic antibiotic coverage (adjusted odds ratio 0·43, 95% CI 0·19-0·96) and regular availability of infection control teams (0·32, 0·11-0·93) were associated with a significant reduction in MDR.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Targeted perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis during contaminated abdominal surgery is insufficient in LMICs, with very few SSI organisms undergoing formal diagnosis. Expansion of testing capacity, development of local guidelines, and implementation of infection control teams could support the prevention of SSI through directed antibiotic prophylaxis, subsequently reducing the burden of MDR.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research.</p><p><strong>Translations: </strong>For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":" ","pages":"e1816-e1825"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00330-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical-site infection (SSI) is one of the most common health-care-associated infections, substantially contributing to antibiotic use. Targeted antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent SSIs and effective treatment are crucial to controlling antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aimed to describe the testing capacity and multidrug resistance (MDR) of SSI microorganisms in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: This analysis included patients undergoing abdominal surgery in seven LMICs (Benin, Ghana, India, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda, and South Africa) as part of the FALCON randomised controlled trial. Wound swabs were collected from patients diagnosed with SSI, as per US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition. Data on microorganism species and MDR, as per CDC and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control definitions, were analysed alongside hospital-level data on local microbiological practices. An adjusted analysis was performed to identify perioperative factors associated with MDR. Testing capacity was assessed by the completion of swab testing in positively diagnosed SSIs.

Findings: Between Dec 10, 2018, and Sept 7, 2020, 5788 patients were recruited to the FALCON trial. 1163 patients were diagnosed with an SSI, of whom 905 (77·8%) received prophylactic antibiotics before surgery. In patients with SSIs, 935 of 1163 (80·4%) did not have a wound swab; 195 were from hospitals not performing swabs (15 hospitals) and 740 were from hospitals with capacity but no swab performed (35 hospitals). Of 228 patients swabbed, 200 (88·5%) had microorganisms detected. Escherichia coli (89 of 200, 37·9%) was the most common microorganism and 116 of 200 (58·0%) patients were not covered by the perioperative prophylactic antibiotic. MDR was found in 102 of 147 (69·4%) patients for whom data were available to determine MDR status. Adjusted analysis found that appropriate prophylactic antibiotic coverage (adjusted odds ratio 0·43, 95% CI 0·19-0·96) and regular availability of infection control teams (0·32, 0·11-0·93) were associated with a significant reduction in MDR.

Interpretation: Targeted perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis during contaminated abdominal surgery is insufficient in LMICs, with very few SSI organisms undergoing formal diagnosis. Expansion of testing capacity, development of local guidelines, and implementation of infection control teams could support the prevention of SSI through directed antibiotic prophylaxis, subsequently reducing the burden of MDR.

Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Translations: For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术部位感染的微生物检测能力和抗菌药物耐药性:在七个低收入和中等收入国家进行的 FALCON 随机试验的事后、前瞻性二次分析。
背景:手术部位感染(SSI)是最常见的医疗相关感染之一,大大增加了抗生素的使用量。有针对性地使用抗生素预防 SSI 并进行有效治疗对控制抗菌药耐药性(AMR)至关重要。本研究旨在描述中低收入国家(LMICs)SSI 微生物的检测能力和多重耐药性(MDR):这项分析包括在七个中低收入国家(贝宁、加纳、印度、墨西哥、尼日利亚、卢旺达和南非)接受腹部手术的患者,是 FALCON 随机对照试验的一部分。根据美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的定义,从确诊为 SSI 的患者身上采集了伤口拭子。根据 CDC 和欧洲疾病预防与控制中心的定义,对微生物种类和 MDR 数据进行了分析,同时还分析了当地微生物学实践的医院级数据。还进行了调整分析,以确定与 MDR 相关的围手术期因素。检测能力根据阳性诊断 SSI 的拭子检测完成情况进行评估:2018年12月10日至2020年9月7日期间,FALCON试验共招募了5788名患者。1163名患者被确诊为SSI,其中905人(77%-8%)在手术前接受了预防性抗生素治疗。在 SSI 患者中,1163 人中有 935 人(80-4%)没有进行伤口拭子检查;195 人来自没有进行拭子检查的医院(15 家医院),740 人来自有能力但没有进行拭子检查的医院(35 家医院)。在 228 名接受拭抹的患者中,有 200 人(88-5%)检测到微生物。大肠埃希菌(200 例中有 89 例,占 37-9%)是最常见的微生物,200 例中有 116 例(占 58-0%)患者未使用围手术期预防性抗生素。在有数据可确定 MDR 状态的 147 例患者中,102 例(69-4%)发现了 MDR。调整后的分析发现,适当的预防性抗生素覆盖率(调整后的几率比0-43,95% CI 0-19-0-96)和感染控制小组的定期到位率(0-32,0-11-0-93)与MDR的显著减少有关:在低收入国家,腹部污染手术围术期针对性抗生素预防措施不足,只有极少数 SSI 微生物经过正式诊断。扩大检测能力、制定地方指南、成立感染控制小组,可以通过有针对性的抗生素预防措施预防SSI,从而减轻MDR的负担:国家健康与护理研究所:摘要的法文和西班牙文译文见 "补充材料 "部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Breastfeeding mothers in DR Congo should have access to the mpox vaccine. Correction to Lancet Glob Health 2022; 10: e380-89. Cost-effectiveness of viral load testing for transitioning antiretroviral therapy-experienced children to dolutegravir in South Africa: a modelling analysis. Family caregivers: an essential link in achieving health information equity. Documenting the burden of dementia in Africa: new approaches and key lessons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1