Risks of occupational mental disorders in Korean civil servants (2009-18).

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqae041
B-Y Choi, K-B Min, S-W Ryoo, J-Y Min
{"title":"Risks of occupational mental disorders in Korean civil servants (2009-18).","authors":"B-Y Choi, K-B Min, S-W Ryoo, J-Y Min","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have suggested that firefighters, police officers and civil servants in the education sector, particularly in Western countries, are vulnerable to mental stress and disorders; however, evidence for this association in South Korea is lacking.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to identify whether firefighters, police officers and teachers are at a higher risk for occupational mental health disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used workers' compensation claims from civil servants (2009-18). Our target population comprised 46 209 civil servants (9009 civil servants in administrative and technical positions, 23 107 police officers, 4417 firefighters and 8676 civil servants in the educational sector). Occupational and environmental medicine physicians and medical doctors defined and confirmed mental disorders. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to evaluate civil servants' risk of occupational mental health disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the civil servants in administrative and technical positions, civil servants in the education sector (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.65-2.84) showed a statistically significant increased risk of mental disorders; conversely, firefighters did not (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.51-1.27). Police officers had a significantly decreased mental disorder risk compared with civil servants in administrative and technical positions (HR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.11-0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of occupational mental health disorders was higher in civil servants in the education sector but lower in police officers and firefighters than civil servants in administrative and technical positions. Further studies on civil servants' mental health awareness are required to confirm our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have suggested that firefighters, police officers and civil servants in the education sector, particularly in Western countries, are vulnerable to mental stress and disorders; however, evidence for this association in South Korea is lacking.

Aims: This study aimed to identify whether firefighters, police officers and teachers are at a higher risk for occupational mental health disorders.

Methods: We used workers' compensation claims from civil servants (2009-18). Our target population comprised 46 209 civil servants (9009 civil servants in administrative and technical positions, 23 107 police officers, 4417 firefighters and 8676 civil servants in the educational sector). Occupational and environmental medicine physicians and medical doctors defined and confirmed mental disorders. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to evaluate civil servants' risk of occupational mental health disorders.

Results: Compared with the civil servants in administrative and technical positions, civil servants in the education sector (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.65-2.84) showed a statistically significant increased risk of mental disorders; conversely, firefighters did not (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.51-1.27). Police officers had a significantly decreased mental disorder risk compared with civil servants in administrative and technical positions (HR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.11-0.25).

Conclusions: The risk of occupational mental health disorders was higher in civil servants in the education sector but lower in police officers and firefighters than civil servants in administrative and technical positions. Further studies on civil servants' mental health awareness are required to confirm our results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国公务员的职业精神障碍风险(2009-18 年)。
背景:以前的研究表明,消防员、警察和教育部门的公务员容易受到精神压力和精神障碍的影响,尤其是在西方国家:以前的研究表明,消防员、警察和教育部门的公务员,尤其是西方国家的公务员,容易受到精神压力和精神障碍的影响;然而,在韩国却缺乏这方面的证据:我们使用了公务员的工伤索赔(2009-18 年)。我们的目标人群包括 46 209 名公务员(9009 名行政和技术岗位公务员、23 107 名警官、4417 名消防员和 8676 名教育部门公务员)。职业与环境医学医生和内科医生对精神障碍进行了定义和确认。我们进行了考克斯比例危险回归分析,以评估公务员患职业性精神疾病的风险:与担任行政和技术职务的公务员相比,教育部门的公务员(危险比 [HR] = 2.16;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.65-2.84)患精神障碍的风险在统计学上显著增加;相反,消防员患精神障碍的风险没有增加(危险比 = 0.80;95% 置信区间 0.51-1.27)。与行政和技术岗位的公务员相比,警察患精神障碍的风险明显降低(HR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.11-0.25):结论:与行政和技术岗位的公务员相比,教育部门的公务员患职业性精神障碍的风险较高,但警察和消防员患职业性精神障碍的风险较低。需要对公务员的心理健康意识进行进一步研究,以证实我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1