Effects of shared text reading for students with intellectual disability: A meta-analytical review of instructional strategies

IF 9.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100615
Rachel Sermier Dessemontet, Megan Geyer, Anne-Laure Linder, Myrto Atzemian, Catherine Martinet, Natalina Meuli, Catherine Audrin, Anne-Françoise de Chambrier
{"title":"Effects of shared text reading for students with intellectual disability: A meta-analytical review of instructional strategies","authors":"Rachel Sermier Dessemontet,&nbsp;Megan Geyer,&nbsp;Anne-Laure Linder,&nbsp;Myrto Atzemian,&nbsp;Catherine Martinet,&nbsp;Natalina Meuli,&nbsp;Catherine Audrin,&nbsp;Anne-Françoise de Chambrier","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although they are an important part of learning to read, listening comprehension skills are often hindered among students with intellectual disability (ID). An increasing number of studies have shown that they can be enhanced through shared text reading interventions. In the current multilevel meta-analysis, we aimed to measure the effect of shared text reading on the listening comprehension skills of students with ID and to identify efficient instructional strategies. The meta-analysis included 19 single-case experimental studies encompassing 67 participants with ID. We found a significant average effect size of shared text reading on the listening comprehension skills of students with ID (log response ratio [<em>LRR</em>] = 1.05, 95% CI [0.87, 1.24]) whether or not they needed alternative or augmentative communication systems to communicate effectively. We found no significant moderator, but instructional strategies backed up by sufficient solid evidence to be considered evidence-based could be identified, with clear implications for practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100615"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X24000241/pdfft?md5=a5a1192181a66e3e87909523e5ddd73f&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X24000241-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X24000241","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although they are an important part of learning to read, listening comprehension skills are often hindered among students with intellectual disability (ID). An increasing number of studies have shown that they can be enhanced through shared text reading interventions. In the current multilevel meta-analysis, we aimed to measure the effect of shared text reading on the listening comprehension skills of students with ID and to identify efficient instructional strategies. The meta-analysis included 19 single-case experimental studies encompassing 67 participants with ID. We found a significant average effect size of shared text reading on the listening comprehension skills of students with ID (log response ratio [LRR] = 1.05, 95% CI [0.87, 1.24]) whether or not they needed alternative or augmentative communication systems to communicate effectively. We found no significant moderator, but instructional strategies backed up by sufficient solid evidence to be considered evidence-based could be identified, with clear implications for practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障学生共享文本阅读的效果:教学策略荟萃分析综述
虽然听力理解是学习阅读的重要组成部分,但智障学生的听力理解能力往往受到阻碍。越来越多的研究表明,通过共享文本阅读干预可以提高他们的听力理解能力。在当前的多层次荟萃分析中,我们旨在衡量共享文本阅读对智障学生听力理解能力的影响,并找出有效的教学策略。荟萃分析包括 19 项单例实验研究,涉及 67 名智障学生。我们发现,无论智障学生是否需要替代性或辅助性交流系统来进行有效交流,共享文本阅读对智障学生听力理解能力的平均影响大小都很明显(对数反应比 [LRR] = 1.05,95% CI [0.87, 1.24])。我们没有发现明显的调节因素,但可以确定有足够确凿证据支持的、以证据为基础的教学策略,并对实践产生明确的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
期刊最新文献
A meta-analysis of the correlation between teacher self-efficacy and teacher resilience: Concerted growth and contextual variance Unveiling the competencies at the core of lifelong learning: A systematic literature review A systematic review on how educators teach AI in K-12 education Translating neuroscience to early childhood education: A scoping review of neuroscience-based professional learning for early childhood educators What is next in mobile-assisted reading? Insights from a decade of eye tracking research into cognitive processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1