Daily motor vehicle traffic volume and other risk factors associated with road deaths in U.S. counties

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.06.001
Leon S. Robertson
{"title":"Daily motor vehicle traffic volume and other risk factors associated with road deaths in U.S. counties","authors":"Leon S. Robertson","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> Road death risk is often characterized as deaths per volume of traffic in geographic regions, the denominator in miles or kilometers supposedly indicative of the magnitude of risk exposure. This paper reports an examination of the differences in the predictive value of factors hypothesized to influence traffic volume and road death risk. <em>Method:</em> The association of 11 risk factors in U.S. counties during the first 7 months of 2020 was examined for consistency of predictions of road death and traffic volume measured by cell phone and vehicle location data. The study employed least squares regression for traffic volume and Poisson regression for deaths with the population as the offset variable. <em>Results:</em> The directions of the regression coefficients for traffic volume and odds of road deaths per population were opposite from one another for 9 of the 11 variables in the analysis of vehicle occupant deaths. Only the coefficients for maximum daily temperature and Saturday travel were in the same direction. The confidence intervals of three risk ratios for pedestrian deaths indicated low reliability but most of the predictor variables were opposite in association with traffic volume and odds of death. Although traffic volume plunged in the first weeks of the pandemic, the results for the months before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were similar. <em>Practical applications:</em> Traffic volume is an inverse risk factor for road deaths at the local level, likely the result of lower speeds on congested roads. Without the application of countermeasures aimed at reducing speed and other risk factors, the reduction of road congestion is likely to increase deaths.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 43-47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Road death risk is often characterized as deaths per volume of traffic in geographic regions, the denominator in miles or kilometers supposedly indicative of the magnitude of risk exposure. This paper reports an examination of the differences in the predictive value of factors hypothesized to influence traffic volume and road death risk. Method: The association of 11 risk factors in U.S. counties during the first 7 months of 2020 was examined for consistency of predictions of road death and traffic volume measured by cell phone and vehicle location data. The study employed least squares regression for traffic volume and Poisson regression for deaths with the population as the offset variable. Results: The directions of the regression coefficients for traffic volume and odds of road deaths per population were opposite from one another for 9 of the 11 variables in the analysis of vehicle occupant deaths. Only the coefficients for maximum daily temperature and Saturday travel were in the same direction. The confidence intervals of three risk ratios for pedestrian deaths indicated low reliability but most of the predictor variables were opposite in association with traffic volume and odds of death. Although traffic volume plunged in the first weeks of the pandemic, the results for the months before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were similar. Practical applications: Traffic volume is an inverse risk factor for road deaths at the local level, likely the result of lower speeds on congested roads. Without the application of countermeasures aimed at reducing speed and other risk factors, the reduction of road congestion is likely to increase deaths.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国各县与公路死亡相关的机动车日交通量及其他风险因素
导言:道路死亡风险通常被描述为地理区域内每交通流量的死亡人数,分母为英里或公里,据说这表明了风险暴露的程度。本文研究了假定影响交通流量和道路死亡风险的因素在预测价值上的差异。方法:研究了 2020 年前 7 个月美国各县 11 个风险因素与道路死亡预测的关联性,以及手机和车辆定位数据测量的交通流量的一致性。研究采用最小二乘回归法预测交通流量,采用泊松回归法预测死亡人数,并将人口作为抵消变量。研究结果在车辆乘员死亡分析的 11 个变量中,有 9 个变量的交通流量回归系数与每人口道路死亡几率的回归系数方向相反。只有日最高气温和周六出行的系数方向相同。行人死亡的三个风险比的置信区间显示可靠性较低,但大多数预测变量与交通流量和死亡几率的关系相反。虽然大流行的前几周交通流量骤降,但 COVID-19 大流行前几个月和期间的结果相似。实际应用:在地方一级,交通流量是道路死亡的反向风险因素,这可能是拥堵道路车速较低的结果。如果不采取旨在降低车速和其他风险因素的对策,减少道路拥堵很可能会增加死亡人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Investigating the factors behind cellphone-distracted crashes: Assessing injury severity among distracted drivers in states with and without cell phone bans An evaluation of driver comprehension of the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon A systematic review of incentive schemes and their implications for truck driver safety performance Trends in parcel delivery driver injury: Evidence from NEISS-Work Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed U.S. workers within the Construction sector, 2010–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1