Implementing the EU LULUCF regulation in Norway: Short-term and long-term policy coherence challenges

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103270
Lars H. Gulbrandsen
{"title":"Implementing the EU LULUCF regulation in Norway: Short-term and long-term policy coherence challenges","authors":"Lars H. Gulbrandsen","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forests play a significant role in Norway's Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry (LULUCF) sector, where the forest sink is equal to about 40% of the national emissions from all other sectors combined. Although not an EU member, Norway has adopted the EU LULUCF regulation through a climate agreement with the EU. This article examines how the LULUCF regulation influences the coherence of Norway's forest policies. Adopting the regulation initially received little public debate, but there is increasing political contestation over how to achieve the LULUCF net carbon dioxide removal target. In the short term, reaching the target might imply rapidly reducing forest harvest, but this would decrease activity in the forestry sector and the supply of harvested wood products that could involve substituting less climate-friendly materials and energy sources. From a long-term perspective, forest management efforts like denser planting, fertilization, harvesting, and rejuvenation might be needed to increase the forest sink capacity. Such policies are supported by forest owners and forestry organizations, but they are opposed by some environmental NGOs and other stakeholders advocating for the protection of forests and biological diversity. The study concludes that assessments of coherence crucially depend on how problems are defined and the time perspective adopted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 103270"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124001242/pdfft?md5=9f857d99a7ab9126adb97f4a4b2ccf60&pid=1-s2.0-S1389934124001242-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124001242","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forests play a significant role in Norway's Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry (LULUCF) sector, where the forest sink is equal to about 40% of the national emissions from all other sectors combined. Although not an EU member, Norway has adopted the EU LULUCF regulation through a climate agreement with the EU. This article examines how the LULUCF regulation influences the coherence of Norway's forest policies. Adopting the regulation initially received little public debate, but there is increasing political contestation over how to achieve the LULUCF net carbon dioxide removal target. In the short term, reaching the target might imply rapidly reducing forest harvest, but this would decrease activity in the forestry sector and the supply of harvested wood products that could involve substituting less climate-friendly materials and energy sources. From a long-term perspective, forest management efforts like denser planting, fertilization, harvesting, and rejuvenation might be needed to increase the forest sink capacity. Such policies are supported by forest owners and forestry organizations, but they are opposed by some environmental NGOs and other stakeholders advocating for the protection of forests and biological diversity. The study concludes that assessments of coherence crucially depend on how problems are defined and the time perspective adopted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在挪威实施欧盟土地利用、土地利用的变化和林业法规:短期和长期政策一致性挑战
森林在挪威的土地利用、土地利用变化和林业(LULUCF)部门发挥着重要作用,森林汇相当于全国所有其他部门排放量总和的约40%。挪威虽然不是欧盟成员国,但已通过与欧盟的气候协议采用了欧盟的土地利用、土地利用的变化和林业法规。本文探讨了土地利用、土地利用的变化和林业法规如何影响挪威森林政策的一致性。起初,公众对采纳该条例的讨论并不多,但在如何实现土地利用、土地利用的变化和林业二氧化碳净减排目标的问题上,政治争论日益激烈。在短期内,实现这一目标可能意味着迅速减少森林采伐量,但这会减少林业部门的活动和采伐木材产品的供应,这可能涉及到替代气候不那么友好的材料和能源。从长远角度来看,可能需要进行森林管理,如密植、施肥、采伐和更新,以提高森林的吸收汇能力。这些政策得到了森林所有者和林业组织的支持,但遭到了一些环保非政府组织和其他倡导保护森林和生物多样性的利益相关者的反对。研究得出的结论是,对一致性的评估主要取决于如何界定问题和采用的时间视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
A generalized Faustmann model with multiple carbon pools Enhancing the economic feasibility of fuel treatments: Market and policy pathways for US Federal Lands The oil palm replanting imperative: Are smallholder farmers willing to participate? Reviewing factors that influence voluntary participation in conservation programs in Latin America Preliminary evidence of softwood shortage and hardwood availability in EU regions: A spatial analysis using the European Forest Industry Database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1