Effects of expectations and sensory unreliability on voice detection – A preregistered study

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Consciousness and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2024.103718
Piotr Szymanek , Marek Homan , Michiel van Elk , Mateusz Hohol
{"title":"Effects of expectations and sensory unreliability on voice detection – A preregistered study","authors":"Piotr Szymanek ,&nbsp;Marek Homan ,&nbsp;Michiel van Elk ,&nbsp;Mateusz Hohol","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The phenomenon of “hearing voices” can be found not only in psychotic disorders, but also in the general population, with individuals across cultures reporting auditory perceptions of supernatural beings. In our preregistered study, we investigated a possible mechanism of such experiences, grounded in the predictive processing model of agency detection. We predicted that in a signal detection task, expecting less or more voices than actually present would drive the response bias toward a more conservative and liberal response strategy, respectively. Moreover, we hypothesized that including sensory noise would enhance these expectancy effects. In line with our predictions, the findings show that detection of voices relies on expectations and that this effect is especially pronounced in the case of unreliable sensory data. As such, the study contributes to our understanding of the predictive processes in hearing and the building blocks of voice hearing experiences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000850/pdfft?md5=5f28b9e1e0f7790efe36078ba293a8fe&pid=1-s2.0-S1053810024000850-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The phenomenon of “hearing voices” can be found not only in psychotic disorders, but also in the general population, with individuals across cultures reporting auditory perceptions of supernatural beings. In our preregistered study, we investigated a possible mechanism of such experiences, grounded in the predictive processing model of agency detection. We predicted that in a signal detection task, expecting less or more voices than actually present would drive the response bias toward a more conservative and liberal response strategy, respectively. Moreover, we hypothesized that including sensory noise would enhance these expectancy effects. In line with our predictions, the findings show that detection of voices relies on expectations and that this effect is especially pronounced in the case of unreliable sensory data. As such, the study contributes to our understanding of the predictive processes in hearing and the building blocks of voice hearing experiences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
期望和感觉不可靠对语音检测的影响 - 一项预先登记的研究
"幻听 "现象不仅出现在精神病患者身上,也出现在普通人身上,不同文化背景的人都会报告自己对超自然生物的听觉感知。在我们的预注册研究中,我们以机构检测的预测处理模型为基础,研究了这种体验的可能机制。我们预测,在信号检测任务中,如果预期的声音比实际出现的声音少或多,就会使反应偏向于更保守和更自由的反应策略。此外,我们还假设,加入感官噪音会增强这些预期效应。与我们的预测一致,研究结果表明,声音的检测依赖于预期,而且这种效应在感官数据不可靠的情况下尤为明显。因此,这项研究有助于我们理解听觉的预测过程和声音听觉体验的构成要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
期刊最新文献
Does perceived voluntariness of others’ actions induce vicarious sense of agency? Evidence from human-robot interaction Temporal action-effect prediction does not affect perceived loudness, but the sense of agency The influence of self-experienced iconic finger-postures on numerical processing: Hemispheric asymmetries in semantic integration Experience after Floatation-REST: Relaxation during floating mediates the afterglow effect Earworms as ‘mental habits’: Involuntary musical imagery is associated with a wide range of habitual behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1