Meat politics. Analysing actors, strategies and power relations governing the meat regime in Austria

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104048
Charlotte Voigt , Laura Hundscheid , Christina Plank , Melanie Pichler
{"title":"Meat politics. Analysing actors, strategies and power relations governing the meat regime in Austria","authors":"Charlotte Voigt ,&nbsp;Laura Hundscheid ,&nbsp;Christina Plank ,&nbsp;Melanie Pichler","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Meat consumption is increasingly discussed as a key lever for reducing environmental and human health impacts within food systems. As in many high-income countries, meat consumption in Austria exceeds dietary and planetary-health recommendations. If, and how, to address overconsumption has become a site of political conflict. Calls for political measures toward sustainable dietary transitions make it important to consider the political economy of meat consumption and production in national contexts. It is thus important to understand the surrounding structures, institutions, and power relations. Using a theoretical approach grounded in food regime theory and critical state analysis, we shed light on important actors and power relations concerning meat production and consumption in Austria. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of interviews and documents, we identify three political projects competing for influence. A strong production driven project pushes to establish a regime of national consumption rather than addressing excessive production and consumption. A civil society driven project is gaining ground in challenging dominant forms of accumulation. In a third project, national producers and alternative production pathways are subject to an increasingly powerful corporate retail sector, which advances economic and increasingly ecologically oriented rationalization to increase profits. Strategies to challenge this corporate power have so far been sparse. Rather, the reproduction of consumer power and responsibility in the producing sector serves to strengthen this development as food retailers can effectively position themselves as custodians of the consumer. Active policies and willingness to accept the necessity for changing consumption are required to redistribute power.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671852400109X/pdfft?md5=d1d6dd6242be4ff6c6bc54f684e3cba6&pid=1-s2.0-S001671852400109X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671852400109X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meat consumption is increasingly discussed as a key lever for reducing environmental and human health impacts within food systems. As in many high-income countries, meat consumption in Austria exceeds dietary and planetary-health recommendations. If, and how, to address overconsumption has become a site of political conflict. Calls for political measures toward sustainable dietary transitions make it important to consider the political economy of meat consumption and production in national contexts. It is thus important to understand the surrounding structures, institutions, and power relations. Using a theoretical approach grounded in food regime theory and critical state analysis, we shed light on important actors and power relations concerning meat production and consumption in Austria. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of interviews and documents, we identify three political projects competing for influence. A strong production driven project pushes to establish a regime of national consumption rather than addressing excessive production and consumption. A civil society driven project is gaining ground in challenging dominant forms of accumulation. In a third project, national producers and alternative production pathways are subject to an increasingly powerful corporate retail sector, which advances economic and increasingly ecologically oriented rationalization to increase profits. Strategies to challenge this corporate power have so far been sparse. Rather, the reproduction of consumer power and responsibility in the producing sector serves to strengthen this development as food retailers can effectively position themselves as custodians of the consumer. Active policies and willingness to accept the necessity for changing consumption are required to redistribute power.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉类政治。分析奥地利肉类制度的参与者、战略和权力关系
肉类消费作为食品系统中减少环境和人类健康影响的一个关键杠杆,正越来越多地被讨论。与许多高收入国家一样,奥地利的肉类消费超过了膳食和地球健康建议。是否以及如何解决过度消费问题已成为政治冲突的焦点。人们呼吁采取政治措施,实现可持续的膳食转型,这使得在国家背景下考虑肉类消费和生产的政治经济问题变得非常重要。因此,了解周围的结构、制度和权力关系非常重要。我们采用以食品制度理论和批判性国家分析为基础的理论方法,揭示了奥地利肉类生产和消费的重要参与者和权力关系。通过对访谈和文件的定性分析,我们确定了三个争夺影响力的政治项目。一个以生产为主导的项目推动建立国家消费制度,而不是解决过度生产和消费的问题。一个由民间社会推动的项目正在挑战主流的积累形式。在第三个项目中,国家生产者和替代生产途径受制于日益强大的企业零售部门,该部门推进经济合理化,并日益以生态为导向以增加利润。迄今为止,挑战这种企业力量的战略还很少。相反,由于食品零售商可以有效地将自己定位为消费者的监护人,消费者的权力和责任在生产部门的再现有助于加强这种发展。重新分配权力需要积极的政策和接受改变消费的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Winds of change – Nomadic grassroots innovations in the maritime shipping sector Retreat or resist: Navigating uncertainties in pastoral Amdo Tibet, China Resilient queer subjects: Lesbian, bisexual, and transgender women on the Israeli periphery Sense of place and micro-business vulnerability to extreme weather in China Conceptualizing labor agency through resilience: Practices of reassembling work on domestic services platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1