A geospatial approach for evaluating impact and potentiality of conservation farming for soil health improvement at regional and farm scale

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil & Tillage Research Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.still.2024.106212
Fabio Castaldi , Gabriele Buttafuoco , Flavio Bertinaria , Piero Toscano
{"title":"A geospatial approach for evaluating impact and potentiality of conservation farming for soil health improvement at regional and farm scale","authors":"Fabio Castaldi ,&nbsp;Gabriele Buttafuoco ,&nbsp;Flavio Bertinaria ,&nbsp;Piero Toscano","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil organic matter (SOM) is a key factor in sustaining soil fertility, sequestering greenhouse gases and reducing soil erosion, in this regard, an accurate estimation and monitoring of the SOM content is crucial for sustainable land management and climate change mitigation strategies. In recent years, there has been a growing consciousness of the need to better understand the dynamics of SOM across different farm management in time and space.</p><p>In this context, the main objective of the study is to improve understanding regarding the relationship between SOM and the main farming systems adopted in Italy by taking spatial correlation into account. For this purpose, a large dataset consisting of topsoil SOM values (0–20 cm) and environmental and farming information was collected in 597 locations (145 fields and 62 farms) representative of the whole agricultural area of Po Valley in Italy. This sizable dataset was analyzed by a novel geospatial analysis using a de-clustering approach in combination with polygon kriging for detecting and understanding the SOM variability over the different fields characterized by irregular shapes and different farming systems.</p><p>The results provided clear evidences of the spatial correlation between SOM, farming systems and soil types. Higher SOM contents were detected in Cambisols (3.11 %) and in field managed according conservation agriculture practices (3.22 %) as compared to other farming systems. Moreover the inclusion of fodder crops in the rotation and the use of no-tillage are two of the most effective practices for increasing and preserving SOM according to our findings.</p><p>Spatial information, such those provided in this study, could facilitate the delineation of tailored solutions for each European Member State for targeting future actions related to carbon farming, and offering crucial insights to support advancements in agriculture for enhancing soil fertility and health and for fostering sustainable agricultural practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724002137/pdfft?md5=80e8242b4631ad40b4bddd583e2dbbd0&pid=1-s2.0-S0167198724002137-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724002137","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil organic matter (SOM) is a key factor in sustaining soil fertility, sequestering greenhouse gases and reducing soil erosion, in this regard, an accurate estimation and monitoring of the SOM content is crucial for sustainable land management and climate change mitigation strategies. In recent years, there has been a growing consciousness of the need to better understand the dynamics of SOM across different farm management in time and space.

In this context, the main objective of the study is to improve understanding regarding the relationship between SOM and the main farming systems adopted in Italy by taking spatial correlation into account. For this purpose, a large dataset consisting of topsoil SOM values (0–20 cm) and environmental and farming information was collected in 597 locations (145 fields and 62 farms) representative of the whole agricultural area of Po Valley in Italy. This sizable dataset was analyzed by a novel geospatial analysis using a de-clustering approach in combination with polygon kriging for detecting and understanding the SOM variability over the different fields characterized by irregular shapes and different farming systems.

The results provided clear evidences of the spatial correlation between SOM, farming systems and soil types. Higher SOM contents were detected in Cambisols (3.11 %) and in field managed according conservation agriculture practices (3.22 %) as compared to other farming systems. Moreover the inclusion of fodder crops in the rotation and the use of no-tillage are two of the most effective practices for increasing and preserving SOM according to our findings.

Spatial information, such those provided in this study, could facilitate the delineation of tailored solutions for each European Member State for targeting future actions related to carbon farming, and offering crucial insights to support advancements in agriculture for enhancing soil fertility and health and for fostering sustainable agricultural practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在区域和农场范围内评估保护性耕作对改善土壤健康的影响和潜力的地理空间方法
土壤有机质(SOM)是维持土壤肥力、封存温室气体和减少土壤侵蚀的关键因素,因此,准确估算和监测土壤有机质含量对于可持续土地管理和气候变化减缓战略至关重要。在此背景下,本研究的主要目的是通过考虑空间相关性,更好地理解 SOM 与意大利采用的主要耕作制度之间的关系。为此,研究人员在代表意大利波河谷整个农业区的 597 个地点(145 块田地和 62 个农场)收集了大量数据集,其中包括表土 SOM 值(0-20 厘米)以及环境和耕作信息。对这一庞大的数据集进行了新颖的地理空间分析,采用了去聚类方法和多边形克里金法,以检测和了解不同田块的 SOM 变化情况,这些田块的特点是形状不规则和耕作制度不同。与其他耕作制度相比,在寒武系土壤(3.11%)和采用保护性耕作法管理的田地(3.22%)中检测到较高的 SOM 含量。此外,根据我们的研究结果,在轮作中加入饲料作物和使用免耕法是增加和保护 SOM 的两种最有效的方法。本研究提供的空间信息有助于为每个欧洲成员国制定有针对性的解决方案,以确定未来与碳耕作相关的行动,并为支持农业进步提供重要的见解,以提高土壤肥力和健康,促进可持续农业实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
期刊最新文献
Tillage erosion as an underestimated driver of carbon dynamics Imitating pangolin scale structure for reducing adhesion and resistance of rotary tillage in wet-adhesive soil Do XRF local models have temporal stability for predicting plant-available nutrients in different years? A long-term study showing the effect of soil fertility management in a tropical field Soil erodibility and hillslope erosion processes affected by vegetation restoration duration Divergent response of Chernozem organic matter towards short-term water stress in Poa pratensis L. rhizosphere and bulk soil in pot experiments: A spectroscopic study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1