Study protocol for the Treating Opioid Patients' Pain and Sadness (TOPPS) study — A randomized control trial to lower depression and chronic pain interference, and increase care retention among persons receiving buprenorphine

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107608
Michael D. Stein , Sally Bendiks , Skylar Karzhevsky , Claire Pierce , Ana Dunn , Adam Majeski , Debra S. Herman , Risa B. Weisberg
{"title":"Study protocol for the Treating Opioid Patients' Pain and Sadness (TOPPS) study — A randomized control trial to lower depression and chronic pain interference, and increase care retention among persons receiving buprenorphine","authors":"Michael D. Stein ,&nbsp;Sally Bendiks ,&nbsp;Skylar Karzhevsky ,&nbsp;Claire Pierce ,&nbsp;Ana Dunn ,&nbsp;Adam Majeski ,&nbsp;Debra S. Herman ,&nbsp;Risa B. Weisberg","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Persons receiving prescription buprenorphine for opioid use disorder experience high rates of comorbid conditions such as chronic pain and depression, which present barriers to buprenorphine care retention. This paper describes the protocol of the TOPPS (Treating Opioid Patients' Pain and Sadness) study, which compares a values-based, behavioral activation intervention with a health education contact-control condition, with the aim of decreasing chronic pain and depression, and increasing buprenorphine care retention for persons with opioid use disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolls and randomizes up to 250 participants currently being treated with buprenorphine to receive three months of either TOPPS, a six-session phone-based behavioral intervention, or a health education (HE) control condition. We compare the TOPPS intervention to HE on the following outcomes: 1) pain interference and pain severity over the 3-month treatment phrase; 2) depressive symptoms over the 3-month treatment phase; and 3) sustained improvements in pain interference, depressive symptoms, and buprenorphine treatment retention over the 12-month study period. We also examine mechanisms by which the intervention may reduce pain interference.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This RCT explores a novel intervention to address chronic pain and depression for individuals receiving buprenorphine in office-based settings. TOPPS may lead to improved pain, depression, and substance use outcomes, and can utilize providers available within buprenorphine programs, broadening the disseminability of this intervention and heightening its public health impact.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Trial</h3><p><strong>#</strong><span>NCT03698669</span><svg><path></path></svg></p></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424001915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Persons receiving prescription buprenorphine for opioid use disorder experience high rates of comorbid conditions such as chronic pain and depression, which present barriers to buprenorphine care retention. This paper describes the protocol of the TOPPS (Treating Opioid Patients' Pain and Sadness) study, which compares a values-based, behavioral activation intervention with a health education contact-control condition, with the aim of decreasing chronic pain and depression, and increasing buprenorphine care retention for persons with opioid use disorder.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolls and randomizes up to 250 participants currently being treated with buprenorphine to receive three months of either TOPPS, a six-session phone-based behavioral intervention, or a health education (HE) control condition. We compare the TOPPS intervention to HE on the following outcomes: 1) pain interference and pain severity over the 3-month treatment phrase; 2) depressive symptoms over the 3-month treatment phase; and 3) sustained improvements in pain interference, depressive symptoms, and buprenorphine treatment retention over the 12-month study period. We also examine mechanisms by which the intervention may reduce pain interference.

Discussion

This RCT explores a novel intervention to address chronic pain and depression for individuals receiving buprenorphine in office-based settings. TOPPS may lead to improved pain, depression, and substance use outcomes, and can utilize providers available within buprenorphine programs, broadening the disseminability of this intervention and heightening its public health impact.

Clinical Trial

#NCT03698669

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗阿片类药物患者的疼痛和悲伤(TOPPS)研究--一项随机对照试验,旨在降低抑郁和慢性疼痛的干扰,并提高接受丁丙诺啡治疗者的护理保留率。
背景:接受丁丙诺啡处方治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的患者合并慢性疼痛和抑郁等疾病的比例很高,这给保留丁丙诺啡治疗带来了障碍。本文介绍了 TOPPS(治疗阿片类药物患者的疼痛和悲伤)研究的方案,该方案比较了基于价值观的行为激活干预和健康教育接触-对照条件,目的是减少慢性疼痛和抑郁,提高阿片类药物使用障碍患者的丁丙诺啡治疗保留率:这项随机对照试验(RCT)招募了多达 250 名目前正在接受丁丙诺啡治疗的参与者,他们将随机接受为期三个月的 TOPPS(一种为期六节的电话行为干预)或健康教育(HE)对照条件。我们将 TOPPS 干预与 HE 在以下结果上进行比较:1)3 个月治疗期间的疼痛干扰和疼痛严重程度;2)3 个月治疗期间的抑郁症状;3)12 个月研究期间疼痛干扰、抑郁症状和丁丙诺啡治疗保持率的持续改善。我们还研究了该干预措施降低疼痛干扰的机制:本研究探讨了一种新型干预措施,以解决在办公室环境中接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者的慢性疼痛和抑郁问题。TOPPS可能会改善疼痛、抑郁和药物使用的结果,并能利用丁丙诺啡项目中的提供者,扩大这一干预措施的可传播性,提高其对公共卫生的影响:临床试验:#NCT03698669。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Design and implementation of a Type-2 hybrid, prospective randomized trial of opioid agonist therapies integration into primary care clinics in Ukraine The clinical and cost effectiveness of internet-delivered self-help Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for family carers of people with dementia (iACT4CARERS): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with ethnically diverse family carers Editorial Board Enhancing clinical drug trial monitoring with blockchain technology Methods to characterize lactate turnover in aging and Alzheimer's disease; The LEAN study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1