首页 > 最新文献

Contemporary clinical trials最新文献

英文 中文
Trial design and enrolment characteristics of LATA (Long-Acting Treatment in Adolescents): A randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, 96-week trial evaluating the virological efficacy, safety, acceptability and quality-of-life of the dual long-acting injectable regimen cabotegravir/ rilpivirine compared to daily oral therapy in virologically suppressed adolescents with HIV-1 infection, aged 12 to <20 years, in Sub-Saharan Africa. LATA(青少年长效治疗)的试验设计和入组特征:一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性、96周的试验,评估了在撒哈拉以南非洲12至<20 岁的病毒学抑制的青少年HIV-1感染中,卡博特格拉韦/利比韦林双重长效注射方案与每日口服治疗的病毒学疗效、安全性、可接受性和生活质量。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.108213
Diana Anena, Elizabeth Chappell, Rashidah Nazzinda, Cecilia Kiilu, Moses Chitsamatanga, Tiyara Arumugam, Alexandra Green, Cissy Kityo Mutuluuza, Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi, Abraham Siika, Moherndran Archary, Lungile Jafta, Stella Namukwaya, Janet Seeley, George Akabwai, Henry Mugerwa, Lisanne Bevers, David Burger, Simon Walker, Alasdair Bamford, Annabelle South, Naomi Apoto, Molly Bush, Margaret J Thomason, Ben Spittle, Deborah Ford, Adeodata R Kekitiinwa, Sarah L Pett

Background: Alternatives to daily oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) are important for adolescents with HIV (AHIV) to improve adherence and outcomes. Long-Acting-injectable (LAI) cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV) has demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety and strong patient preference in adults.

Methods: LATA is an ongoing randomised, open-label, 96-week, non-inferiority trial evaluating the efficacy, safety and acceptability of LAI CAB/RPV vs. daily oral therapy with tenofovir (disoproxil fumarate or alafenamide)/lamivudine/dolutegravir (TLD). Participants are virologically suppressed AHIV aged 12- < 20 years in Kenya/South Africa/Uganda/Zimbabwe. Randomisation was 1:1 to LAI CAB/RPV given once every 8 weeks (after optional oral lead-in) or daily oral TLD. The primary outcome is viral rebound (two consecutive viral loads ≥50 copies/mL by 96-weeks). Viral loads are measured every 24 weeks. The trial employs the Smooth Away From the Expected (SAFE) non-inferiority frontier, where the non-inferiority margin depends on the observed event rate in the control arm. Secondary outcomes include confirmed viral load ≥200 copies/mL by 96-weeks, HIV resistance, safety, patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness. LAI participants return to oral ART at confirmed viral load ≥200 copies/mL; LAI participants who become pregnant are given the choice to continue on LAI or to switch back to daily oral ART, with optional pharmacokinetic sampling during pregnancy and post-partum in both groups. Enrolment of 476 AHIV completed in April 2024. Results will be reported in 2026.

Conclusion: LATA is the first trial comparing the efficacy, safety and acceptability of LAI CAB/RPV to oral ART in AHIV, enrolled in Sub-Saharan Africa, using a programmatic approach to viral load testing.

Trial registration: This trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05154747).

背景:替代每日口服抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)对于改善青少年艾滋病毒感染者(AHIV)的依从性和预后非常重要。长效注射(LAI)卡波特韦/利匹韦林(CAB/RPV)在成人中表现出优异的疗效和安全性,并且有很强的患者偏好。方法:LATA是一项正在进行的随机、开放标签、96周的非劣效性试验,评估LAI CAB/RPV与替诺福韦(富马酸二氧吡酯或阿拉法胺)/拉米夫定/多替格雷韦(TLD)每日口服治疗的有效性、安全性和可接受性。结论:LATA是第一个比较LAI CAB/RPV与口服ART治疗艾滋病的有效性、安全性和可接受性的试验,在撒哈拉以南非洲招募,采用程序化的病毒载量检测方法。试验注册:该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT05154747)。
{"title":"Trial design and enrolment characteristics of LATA (Long-Acting Treatment in Adolescents): A randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, 96-week trial evaluating the virological efficacy, safety, acceptability and quality-of-life of the dual long-acting injectable regimen cabotegravir/ rilpivirine compared to daily oral therapy in virologically suppressed adolescents with HIV-1 infection, aged 12 to <20 years, in Sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Diana Anena, Elizabeth Chappell, Rashidah Nazzinda, Cecilia Kiilu, Moses Chitsamatanga, Tiyara Arumugam, Alexandra Green, Cissy Kityo Mutuluuza, Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi, Abraham Siika, Moherndran Archary, Lungile Jafta, Stella Namukwaya, Janet Seeley, George Akabwai, Henry Mugerwa, Lisanne Bevers, David Burger, Simon Walker, Alasdair Bamford, Annabelle South, Naomi Apoto, Molly Bush, Margaret J Thomason, Ben Spittle, Deborah Ford, Adeodata R Kekitiinwa, Sarah L Pett","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.108213","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.108213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alternatives to daily oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) are important for adolescents with HIV (AHIV) to improve adherence and outcomes. Long-Acting-injectable (LAI) cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV) has demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety and strong patient preference in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LATA is an ongoing randomised, open-label, 96-week, non-inferiority trial evaluating the efficacy, safety and acceptability of LAI CAB/RPV vs. daily oral therapy with tenofovir (disoproxil fumarate or alafenamide)/lamivudine/dolutegravir (TLD). Participants are virologically suppressed AHIV aged 12- < 20 years in Kenya/South Africa/Uganda/Zimbabwe. Randomisation was 1:1 to LAI CAB/RPV given once every 8 weeks (after optional oral lead-in) or daily oral TLD. The primary outcome is viral rebound (two consecutive viral loads ≥50 copies/mL by 96-weeks). Viral loads are measured every 24 weeks. The trial employs the Smooth Away From the Expected (SAFE) non-inferiority frontier, where the non-inferiority margin depends on the observed event rate in the control arm. Secondary outcomes include confirmed viral load ≥200 copies/mL by 96-weeks, HIV resistance, safety, patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness. LAI participants return to oral ART at confirmed viral load ≥200 copies/mL; LAI participants who become pregnant are given the choice to continue on LAI or to switch back to daily oral ART, with optional pharmacokinetic sampling during pregnancy and post-partum in both groups. Enrolment of 476 AHIV completed in April 2024. Results will be reported in 2026.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LATA is the first trial comparing the efficacy, safety and acceptability of LAI CAB/RPV to oral ART in AHIV, enrolled in Sub-Saharan Africa, using a programmatic approach to viral load testing.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05154747).</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145942790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protocol for a randomized trial of a scalable, interactive tool to support surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients. 一项可扩展的、交互式工具的随机试验方案,以支持危重患者的替代决策者。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108262
Aleksandra E Olszewski, Rachel A Butler, Deepshikha C Ashana, Shannon Carson, Christopher E Cox, Catherine L Hough, David Y Hwang, David Maloney, Florian Mayr, Vidya Menon, Jay S Steingrub, Donald R Sullivan, Grace Vincent, Blair Wendlandt, Douglas White

Background: Patients, particularly those at the end of their lives, frequently receive goal-discordant care, and their surrogate decision-makers suffer long-term psychological injury. Contributors to these issues may include infrequent communication between clinicians and surrogates, failure to discuss prognosis, values, and treatment options that include comfort-focused care, and surrogates facing high-stakes decision-making while underprepared and overwhelmed psychologically and emotionally.

Design: This is a multicenter, patient-randomized efficacy trial of a multi-component intervention, versus usual care, for 370 incapacitated, critically ill adults at high risk of death or severe disability, and their surrogate decision-makers, from 7 hospitals across the United States.

Intervention: The intervention combines surrogate utilization of a digital Family Support Tool (FST) in real-time during their loved one's hospitalization with proactively scheduled family meetings, for which both surrogates and clinicians receive additional preparation, at set intervals during the ICU hospitalization. Those in the control arm will receive usual ICU care.

Outcomes: Our primary outcome is patient-centeredness of care, measured using the modified Patient Perceived Patient-Centeredness of Care (PPPC) scale. Secondary outcomes include surrogates' psychological symptom burden, communication and decision quality, and patients' health resource utilization and clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: This trial will provide robust evidence about the impact of combining the FST with increased and intentional communication, on patient, family, and health system outcomes for those hospitalized in the ICU.

背景:患者,特别是那些在生命末期的患者,经常接受目标不一致的护理,他们的代理决策者遭受长期的心理伤害。造成这些问题的原因可能包括临床医生和代孕母亲之间缺乏交流,未能讨论预后、价值观和治疗选择,包括以舒适为中心的护理,以及代孕母亲在心理和情感上准备不足和不堪重负时面临高风险的决策。设计:这是一项多中心、患者随机的多组分干预与常规护理的疗效试验,研究对象是来自美国7家医院的370名丧失行为能力、死亡或严重残疾风险高的危重症成年人及其代理决策者。干预措施:干预措施结合了在其亲人住院期间实时使用数字家庭支持工具(FST)和主动安排的家庭会议,在ICU住院期间,代理人和临床医生都接受额外的准备。对照组患者将接受常规ICU护理。结果:我们的主要结果是以患者为中心的护理,使用改良的患者感知以患者为中心的护理(PPPC)量表进行测量。次要结局包括受试者心理症状负担、沟通决策质量、患者健康资源利用及临床结局。结论:该试验将提供强有力的证据,证明将FST与增加和有意的沟通相结合对ICU住院患者、家庭和卫生系统结果的影响。
{"title":"Protocol for a randomized trial of a scalable, interactive tool to support surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients.","authors":"Aleksandra E Olszewski, Rachel A Butler, Deepshikha C Ashana, Shannon Carson, Christopher E Cox, Catherine L Hough, David Y Hwang, David Maloney, Florian Mayr, Vidya Menon, Jay S Steingrub, Donald R Sullivan, Grace Vincent, Blair Wendlandt, Douglas White","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108262","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2026.108262","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients, particularly those at the end of their lives, frequently receive goal-discordant care, and their surrogate decision-makers suffer long-term psychological injury. Contributors to these issues may include infrequent communication between clinicians and surrogates, failure to discuss prognosis, values, and treatment options that include comfort-focused care, and surrogates facing high-stakes decision-making while underprepared and overwhelmed psychologically and emotionally.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a multicenter, patient-randomized efficacy trial of a multi-component intervention, versus usual care, for 370 incapacitated, critically ill adults at high risk of death or severe disability, and their surrogate decision-makers, from 7 hospitals across the United States.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention combines surrogate utilization of a digital Family Support Tool (FST) in real-time during their loved one's hospitalization with proactively scheduled family meetings, for which both surrogates and clinicians receive additional preparation, at set intervals during the ICU hospitalization. Those in the control arm will receive usual ICU care.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Our primary outcome is patient-centeredness of care, measured using the modified Patient Perceived Patient-Centeredness of Care (PPPC) scale. Secondary outcomes include surrogates' psychological symptom burden, communication and decision quality, and patients' health resource utilization and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial will provide robust evidence about the impact of combining the FST with increased and intentional communication, on patient, family, and health system outcomes for those hospitalized in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147275786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A pilot trial of 'HypoPals': Assessing trial procedures feasibility and intervention acceptability for a prospective digital hypoglycemia behavioral intervention study. “HypoPals”的试点试验:评估前瞻性数字低血糖行为干预研究的试验程序可行性和干预可接受性。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108261
Yu Kuei Lin, Emily Hepworth, Juniar Lucien, Annika Agni, Adam Martin-Schwarze, Sean Newman, Nicolle Marinec, James E Aikens, Catherine Spino, Rodica Pop-Busui, Jillian Strayhorn, Melissa DeJonckheere, Nicole de Zoysa, Stephanie A Amiel, John D Piette

Background: Despite advances in diabetes technology, hypoglycemia remains a major problem for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We developed HypoPals, a scalable digital behavioral intervention program comprised of two intervention components, (i) hypoglycemia symptom detection training ('SDT') and (ii) psychoeducation to address unhelpful hypoglycemia beliefs (Education Plus, 'ED+'), to improve hypoglycemia self-management in adults with T1D.

Methods: A 52-week pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility of a prospective decentralized 2 × 2 factorial trial with the following characteristics: participant recruitment from a national T1D patient registry; minimization randomization; and remote outcome data collection to evaluate the effectiveness of HypoPals intervention components. This pilot study's primary outcome was the number of participants needed to achieve 20 participants completing the intervention. Intervention acceptability was also assessed.

Results: Forty participants were randomized to receive 10 weeks of either SDT only; ED+ only; both; or usual care only. All participants completed the intervention. Thus, 20 participants were recruited to achieve 20 participants completing the intervention. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed across randomization groups. Retention was 98% at the 26- and 52-week follow-ups, and 98% of participants provided complete outcome data. The majority (88%) found HypoPals at least somewhat helpful. No adverse events were determined to be related to the intervention.

Conclusions: This pilot trial demonstrated the feasibility of both integrating multiple advanced trial strategies and the intervention's acceptability. Results supported the conduct of a large-scale, decentralized, factorial trial to evaluate HypoPals' effectiveness in reducing hypoglycemia in adults with T1D.

背景:尽管糖尿病技术取得了进步,但低血糖仍然是1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的主要问题。我们开发了HypoPals,这是一个可扩展的数字行为干预程序,由两个干预组件组成,(i)低血糖症状检测训练(SDT)和(ii)心理教育,以解决无益的低血糖信念(Education Plus, ED+),以改善成人T1D患者的低血糖自我管理。方法:进行了一项为期52周的试点研究,以评估前瞻性分散2 × 2因子试验的可行性,该试验具有以下特征:参与者从国家T1D患者登记处招募;最小化随机化;和远程结局数据收集,以评估HypoPals干预成分的有效性。这项初步研究的主要结果是需要达到20名参与者完成干预的参与者数量。同时评估干预措施的可接受性。结果:40名参与者随机接受10 周的SDT治疗;ED +;两个;或者只做常规护理。所有参与者都完成了干预。因此,招募了20名参与者,以达到20名参与者完成干预。随机分组间基线特征无显著差异。在26周和52周的随访中,保留率为98%,98%的参与者提供了完整的结果数据。大多数人(88%)认为HypoPals至少有些帮助。未发现与干预相关的不良事件。结论:该试点试验证明了整合多种先进试验策略的可行性和干预措施的可接受性。结果支持进行一项大规模、分散的析因试验,以评估HypoPals降低成人T1D患者低血糖的有效性。
{"title":"A pilot trial of 'HypoPals': Assessing trial procedures feasibility and intervention acceptability for a prospective digital hypoglycemia behavioral intervention study.","authors":"Yu Kuei Lin, Emily Hepworth, Juniar Lucien, Annika Agni, Adam Martin-Schwarze, Sean Newman, Nicolle Marinec, James E Aikens, Catherine Spino, Rodica Pop-Busui, Jillian Strayhorn, Melissa DeJonckheere, Nicole de Zoysa, Stephanie A Amiel, John D Piette","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108261","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108261","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advances in diabetes technology, hypoglycemia remains a major problem for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We developed HypoPals, a scalable digital behavioral intervention program comprised of two intervention components, (i) hypoglycemia symptom detection training ('SDT') and (ii) psychoeducation to address unhelpful hypoglycemia beliefs (Education Plus, 'ED+'), to improve hypoglycemia self-management in adults with T1D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 52-week pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility of a prospective decentralized 2 × 2 factorial trial with the following characteristics: participant recruitment from a national T1D patient registry; minimization randomization; and remote outcome data collection to evaluate the effectiveness of HypoPals intervention components. This pilot study's primary outcome was the number of participants needed to achieve 20 participants completing the intervention. Intervention acceptability was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants were randomized to receive 10 weeks of either SDT only; ED+ only; both; or usual care only. All participants completed the intervention. Thus, 20 participants were recruited to achieve 20 participants completing the intervention. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed across randomization groups. Retention was 98% at the 26- and 52-week follow-ups, and 98% of participants provided complete outcome data. The majority (88%) found HypoPals at least somewhat helpful. No adverse events were determined to be related to the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot trial demonstrated the feasibility of both integrating multiple advanced trial strategies and the intervention's acceptability. Results supported the conduct of a large-scale, decentralized, factorial trial to evaluate HypoPals' effectiveness in reducing hypoglycemia in adults with T1D.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147269748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combined adapted physical activity and art-therapy intervention in myasthenia gravis: Study protocol for a randomized crossover pilot trial. 结合适应性体育活动和艺术治疗干预重症肌无力:一项随机交叉试点试验的研究方案。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108260
Célia Leclercq, Annie Archer, Fanny Ceccone, J B Davion, Hervé Devanne, Céline Tard, Alessandro Porrovecchio

Background: Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disorder with fluctuating weakness and substantial impact on quality of life (QoL). Despite advances in pharmacological treatment, patients often experience fatigue, anxiety, and reduced daily functioning. Adapted Physical Activity (APA) has shown benefits in chronic neuromuscular disorders, while Art Therapy (AT) has demonstrated positive psychosocial effects in neurological conditions. However, no studies have investigated the potential synergy of APA combined with AT in MG.

Methods: We designed a monocentric, prospective, randomized crossover pilot trial to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an integrated APA + AT program compared to APA alone. A total of 102 adult patients with MG will be recruited from Lille University Hospital and partner centers. Each participant will undergo two 6-week phases (APA only vs APA + AT), separated by a 46-week washout. Primary outcome is change in QoL (MG-QOL15) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include fatigue (FSS), anxiety and depression (HADS), activities of daily living (MG-ADL), physical function tests, physical activity (IPAQ, accelerometry), and psychosocial outcomes assessed through qualitative methods (interviews, ethnography, creative elicitation). Quantitative data will be analyzed with repeated-measures models; qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis.

Discussion: This trial will be the first to explore a combined APA + AT intervention in MG. By addressing both physical and psychosocial dimensions, the study may provide evidence for integrated, patient-centered care strategies in rare neuromuscular disorders. If feasible and effective, results could inform future multicenter trials and clinical practice.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07125105.

背景:重症肌无力(MG)是一种罕见的自身免疫性疾病,具有波动性虚弱和对生活质量(QoL)的重大影响。尽管药物治疗取得了进展,但患者经常感到疲劳、焦虑和日常功能下降。适应性体育活动(APA)已显示出对慢性神经肌肉疾病的益处,而艺术疗法(AT)已显示出对神经系统疾病的积极心理社会影响。然而,没有研究调查APA联合AT在MG中的潜在协同作用。方法:我们设计了一项单中心、前瞻性、随机交叉试验,以评估综合APA + AT方案与单独APA方案相比的可行性和初步疗效。将从里尔大学医院和合作中心招募102名MG成年患者。每位参与者将经历两个为期6周的阶段(仅APA vs APA + AT),中间间隔46周的洗脱期。主要观察指标为3 个月时生活质量(MG-QOL15)的变化。次要结局包括疲劳(FSS)、焦虑和抑郁(HADS)、日常生活活动(MG-ADL)、身体功能测试、身体活动(IPAQ、加速度计)和通过定性方法(访谈、民族志、创造性启发)评估的社会心理结局。定量数据将用重复测量模型进行分析;将对定性数据进行专题分析。讨论:该试验将首次探索APA + AT联合干预MG。通过解决生理和心理两方面的问题,该研究可能为罕见神经肌肉疾病的综合、以患者为中心的护理策略提供证据。如果可行和有效,结果可以为未来的多中心试验和临床实践提供信息。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT07125105。
{"title":"Combined adapted physical activity and art-therapy intervention in myasthenia gravis: Study protocol for a randomized crossover pilot trial.","authors":"Célia Leclercq, Annie Archer, Fanny Ceccone, J B Davion, Hervé Devanne, Céline Tard, Alessandro Porrovecchio","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2026.108260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disorder with fluctuating weakness and substantial impact on quality of life (QoL). Despite advances in pharmacological treatment, patients often experience fatigue, anxiety, and reduced daily functioning. Adapted Physical Activity (APA) has shown benefits in chronic neuromuscular disorders, while Art Therapy (AT) has demonstrated positive psychosocial effects in neurological conditions. However, no studies have investigated the potential synergy of APA combined with AT in MG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a monocentric, prospective, randomized crossover pilot trial to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an integrated APA + AT program compared to APA alone. A total of 102 adult patients with MG will be recruited from Lille University Hospital and partner centers. Each participant will undergo two 6-week phases (APA only vs APA + AT), separated by a 46-week washout. Primary outcome is change in QoL (MG-QOL15) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include fatigue (FSS), anxiety and depression (HADS), activities of daily living (MG-ADL), physical function tests, physical activity (IPAQ, accelerometry), and psychosocial outcomes assessed through qualitative methods (interviews, ethnography, creative elicitation). Quantitative data will be analyzed with repeated-measures models; qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial will be the first to explore a combined APA + AT intervention in MG. By addressing both physical and psychosocial dimensions, the study may provide evidence for integrated, patient-centered care strategies in rare neuromuscular disorders. If feasible and effective, results could inform future multicenter trials and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07125105.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness and implementation of an embedded community-based heart-age risk education model (E-CHARM) in improving cardiovascular risk awareness and health behaviors among older adults with hypertension: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. 嵌入式社区心脏年龄风险教育模型(E-CHARM)在提高老年高血压患者心血管风险意识和健康行为方面的有效性和实施:一项随机对照试验方案
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108258
Guanzhou Wang, Yuxuan Huang, Boyuan Li, You Zuo, Weijing Song, Yaxi Li, Yuzhou Sun, Naifei Xue, Zuhui Wang, Tianyi Wang, Zhanran Hu

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in China, with hypertension as the most common modifiable risk factor. Despite comprehensive primary care based on chronic disease management, patients' awareness of CVD risk and motivation for self-management remain suboptimal.

Methods: This study is a parallel-group, individually randomized controlled trial conducted within routine chronic disease management at a community health center in Kunshan, China. Approximately 400 adults aged 60 years and above with hypertension will be randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either a personalized Heart Age report with brief physician explanation or usual care. The primary outcome is CVD risk awareness at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in self-reported physical activity, diet, and medication adherence. An exploratory analysis of clinical indicators (blood pressure, glucose, lipids, BMI) will be conducted at 12 months. Implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, fidelity) will also be assessed.

Discussion: This pragmatic trial integrates a personalized Heart Age risk communication model into routine chronic disease management. By embedding brief, physician-delivered risk feedback within existing primary care workflows, the intervention seeks to improve patient awareness and encourage self-management behaviors without increasing resource burden. Findings will inform the feasibility and scalability of personalized risk communication strategies in low-resource primary care settings.

Trial registration numbers: NCT07045363.

背景:在中国,心血管疾病(CVD)是导致死亡的主要原因,其中高血压是最常见的可改变的危险因素。尽管基于慢性疾病管理的综合初级保健,患者对CVD风险的认识和自我管理的动机仍然不够理想。方法:本研究采用平行组、个体随机对照试验,在中国昆山某社区卫生中心进行常规慢性疾病管理。大约400名年龄在60 岁及以上的高血压患者将被随机分配(1:1),接受个性化的心脏年龄报告和简短的医生解释或常规护理。3 个月时的主要结局是心血管疾病风险意识。次要结局包括自我报告的身体活动、饮食和药物依从性的变化。将在12 个月时对临床指标(血压、血糖、血脂、BMI)进行探索性分析。实施结果(可行性、可接受性、保真度)也将被评估。讨论:这项实用的试验将个性化的心脏年龄风险沟通模型整合到常规慢性疾病管理中。通过在现有的初级保健工作流程中嵌入简短的、医生提供的风险反馈,该干预措施旨在提高患者的意识,鼓励自我管理行为,同时不增加资源负担。研究结果将为低资源初级保健环境中个性化风险沟通策略的可行性和可扩展性提供信息。试验注册号:NCT07045363。
{"title":"Effectiveness and implementation of an embedded community-based heart-age risk education model (E-CHARM) in improving cardiovascular risk awareness and health behaviors among older adults with hypertension: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Guanzhou Wang, Yuxuan Huang, Boyuan Li, You Zuo, Weijing Song, Yaxi Li, Yuzhou Sun, Naifei Xue, Zuhui Wang, Tianyi Wang, Zhanran Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108258","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in China, with hypertension as the most common modifiable risk factor. Despite comprehensive primary care based on chronic disease management, patients' awareness of CVD risk and motivation for self-management remain suboptimal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a parallel-group, individually randomized controlled trial conducted within routine chronic disease management at a community health center in Kunshan, China. Approximately 400 adults aged 60 years and above with hypertension will be randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either a personalized Heart Age report with brief physician explanation or usual care. The primary outcome is CVD risk awareness at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in self-reported physical activity, diet, and medication adherence. An exploratory analysis of clinical indicators (blood pressure, glucose, lipids, BMI) will be conducted at 12 months. Implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, fidelity) will also be assessed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This pragmatic trial integrates a personalized Heart Age risk communication model into routine chronic disease management. By embedding brief, physician-delivered risk feedback within existing primary care workflows, the intervention seeks to improve patient awareness and encourage self-management behaviors without increasing resource burden. Findings will inform the feasibility and scalability of personalized risk communication strategies in low-resource primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration numbers: </strong>NCT07045363.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146225777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
School-partnered collaborative care intervention for young children with type 1 diabetes: A pilot and feasibility protocol. 1型糖尿病幼儿学校合作护理干预:试点和可行性方案
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108259
Christine A March, Scott Rothenberger, Elissa Naame, Victoria Stouffer, Christine Moon, Aaron R Lyon, Ingrid Libman, Elizabeth Miller

Background: Despite advances in treatments, children with type 1 diabetes struggle to achieve glycemic targets. Though school-based programs may help support families to achieve targets, challenges remain with coordinating care between health systems and schools, where students spend much of their day. Monthly, virtual meetings between a parent, school nurse, and a diabetes specialist may bridge this gap by using a shared treatment plan to meet goals.

Methods: This is a pilot cluster-randomized trial to test a school-partnered collaborative care model (SPACE for T1D) for children aged 5-12 years with type 1 diabetes for ≥6 months. School districts were randomized in a 2:1 allocation ratio to the intervention (SPACE for T1D) or enhanced usual care. Participants complete the study over four consecutive months. Parents and school nurses evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and usability of SPACE using valid questionnaires. The study team monitors retention, fidelity, and practicality. Exploratory outcomes assess change in glycemia, care utilization, type 1 diabetes-related quality of life, self-efficacy skills, and missed class time due to diabetes interventions.

Results: Twelve school districts were randomized. One dropped out due to no eligible students, leaving 11 participating districts. We approached 46 students; 30 provided consent for a recruitment rate of 65%.

Conclusions: This study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the SPACE for T1D intervention in varied school districts. Findings will facilitate a fully-powered trial to evaluate the impact on health and academic outcomes, adding to the evidence base of school-based interventions to support youth with chronic disease. NCT: NCT06420661.

背景:尽管治疗取得了进展,但1型糖尿病儿童仍难以达到血糖目标。虽然以学校为基础的项目可能有助于支持家庭实现目标,但在协调卫生系统和学校之间的护理方面仍然存在挑战,因为学生每天的大部分时间都在学校度过。家长、学校护士和糖尿病专家之间每月的虚拟会议可以通过使用共同的治疗计划来实现目标,从而弥合这种差距。方法:这是一项试验性集群随机试验,旨在测试一种学校合作的T1D护理模式(SPACE for T1D),用于治疗年龄在5-12 岁、1型糖尿病患者≥6 个月的儿童。学区以2:1的分配比例随机分配到干预(T1D的空间)或增强的常规护理。参与者在连续四个月的时间里完成这项研究。家长和学校护士使用有效问卷评估空间的可行性、可接受性、适当性和可用性。研究团队监控留存率、保真度和实用性。探索性结果评估血糖、护理利用、1型糖尿病相关生活质量、自我效能技能和因糖尿病干预导致的缺课时间的变化。结果:12个学区被随机化。由于没有符合条件的学生,一个地区退出了,剩下11个参与地区。我们接触了46名学生;30人同意65%的招聘率。结论:本研究将评估空间在不同学区进行T1D干预的可行性和可接受性。研究结果将促进一项全面有力的试验,以评估对健康和学业成果的影响,增加以学校为基础的干预措施的证据基础,以支持患有慢性疾病的青少年。NCT: NCT06420661。
{"title":"School-partnered collaborative care intervention for young children with type 1 diabetes: A pilot and feasibility protocol.","authors":"Christine A March, Scott Rothenberger, Elissa Naame, Victoria Stouffer, Christine Moon, Aaron R Lyon, Ingrid Libman, Elizabeth Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108259","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advances in treatments, children with type 1 diabetes struggle to achieve glycemic targets. Though school-based programs may help support families to achieve targets, challenges remain with coordinating care between health systems and schools, where students spend much of their day. Monthly, virtual meetings between a parent, school nurse, and a diabetes specialist may bridge this gap by using a shared treatment plan to meet goals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a pilot cluster-randomized trial to test a school-partnered collaborative care model (SPACE for T1D) for children aged 5-12 years with type 1 diabetes for ≥6 months. School districts were randomized in a 2:1 allocation ratio to the intervention (SPACE for T1D) or enhanced usual care. Participants complete the study over four consecutive months. Parents and school nurses evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and usability of SPACE using valid questionnaires. The study team monitors retention, fidelity, and practicality. Exploratory outcomes assess change in glycemia, care utilization, type 1 diabetes-related quality of life, self-efficacy skills, and missed class time due to diabetes interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve school districts were randomized. One dropped out due to no eligible students, leaving 11 participating districts. We approached 46 students; 30 provided consent for a recruitment rate of 65%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the SPACE for T1D intervention in varied school districts. Findings will facilitate a fully-powered trial to evaluate the impact on health and academic outcomes, adding to the evidence base of school-based interventions to support youth with chronic disease. NCT: NCT06420661.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146218942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multilevel Action Toward Colorectal Cancer and Hepatitis C Education and Screening (MATCHES): Study protocol for a hybrid 1 stepped-wedge multibehavioral randomized trial. 对结直肠癌和丙型肝炎教育和筛查的多层次作用(MATCHES):一项混合楔形多行为随机试验的研究方案。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108256
Rania Abdulla, Carol Boxtha, Emily P Courtney, Oyedolapo A Anyanwu, Steven K Sutton, Katherine Chung-Bridges, Hirut G Kassaye, Elizabeth Philippe, Kelly A Mudon, Estefany Frias, Daniel Parras, Natasha Avrilien, Mark Friedman, Kea Turner, Gloria D Coronado, Victoria L Champion, Jonathan N Tobin, Susan T Vadaparampil, Clement K Gwede, Shannon M Christy

Background: The current paper describes the protocol for the Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial titled Multilevel Action Toward Colorectal Cancer and Hepatitis C Education and Screening (MATCHES). The aims of the MATCHES intervention trial are to promote both colorectal cancer (CRC) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening among patients aged 45-75 years old receiving primary care at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) who are not currently up-to-date with both screenings and to examine implementation outcomes.

Methods: Ten health center sites in the FQHC will be randomized in two waves using a stepped wedge design. Intervention strategies target the system, clinician, and patient levels. System-level strategies include a customized electronic health record best practice alert that pairs CRC and HCV screening and standard operating procedures. Clinician-level strategies include a training session and feedback on screening rates. Patient-level strategies include a theory-informed educational booklet about CRC and HCV screening in English or Spanish and access to stool DNA testing and HCV screening among 350 participants. The primary outcome is both CRC and HCV screening uptake at 12 months post-intervention among 350 participants. System-wide CRC and HCV screening rates among patients 45-75 years old also will be monitored. Implementation barriers and facilitators will be examined.

Results: The project is ongoing; effectiveness and implementation outcomes will be determined following study completion.

Conclusions: Results may inform potential subsequent scale-up and offer insights for promoting multiple screening behaviors in a single intervention.

Clinical trials identifier: NCT06745895 (date registered: 2024-12-20); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06745895?cond=CRC%20AND%20HCV&rank=.

背景:本文描述了一项名为“对结直肠癌和丙型肝炎教育和筛查的多层次行动”(MATCHES)的混合1型有效性实施试验的方案。MATCHES干预试验的目的是促进45-75岁 年龄在联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)接受初级保健的患者进行结直肠癌(CRC)和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)筛查,这些患者目前没有进行这两种筛查,并检查实施结果。方法:采用阶梯楔形设计将FQHC的10个卫生中心站点随机分为两波。干预策略针对系统、临床医生和患者水平。系统级战略包括定制的电子健康记录最佳实践警报,将CRC和HCV筛查与标准操作程序相结合。临床层面的策略包括培训课程和对筛查率的反馈。患者层面的策略包括用英语或西班牙语提供关于结直肠癌和丙型肝炎筛查的理论教育小册子,并对350名参与者进行粪便DNA检测和丙型肝炎筛查。主要结局是在干预后12 个月对350名参与者进行CRC和HCV筛查。还将监测45-75岁 患者的全系统CRC和HCV筛查率。将审查实施障碍和促进因素。结果:项目正在进行中;有效性和实施结果将在研究完成后确定。结论:结果可能为后续的潜在规模扩大提供信息,并为在单一干预中促进多种筛查行为提供见解。临床试验标识符:NCT06745895(注册日期:2024-12-20);https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06745895?cond=CRC%20AND%20HCV&rank=。
{"title":"Multilevel Action Toward Colorectal Cancer and Hepatitis C Education and Screening (MATCHES): Study protocol for a hybrid 1 stepped-wedge multibehavioral randomized trial.","authors":"Rania Abdulla, Carol Boxtha, Emily P Courtney, Oyedolapo A Anyanwu, Steven K Sutton, Katherine Chung-Bridges, Hirut G Kassaye, Elizabeth Philippe, Kelly A Mudon, Estefany Frias, Daniel Parras, Natasha Avrilien, Mark Friedman, Kea Turner, Gloria D Coronado, Victoria L Champion, Jonathan N Tobin, Susan T Vadaparampil, Clement K Gwede, Shannon M Christy","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108256","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current paper describes the protocol for the Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial titled Multilevel Action Toward Colorectal Cancer and Hepatitis C Education and Screening (MATCHES). The aims of the MATCHES intervention trial are to promote both colorectal cancer (CRC) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening among patients aged 45-75 years old receiving primary care at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) who are not currently up-to-date with both screenings and to examine implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten health center sites in the FQHC will be randomized in two waves using a stepped wedge design. Intervention strategies target the system, clinician, and patient levels. System-level strategies include a customized electronic health record best practice alert that pairs CRC and HCV screening and standard operating procedures. Clinician-level strategies include a training session and feedback on screening rates. Patient-level strategies include a theory-informed educational booklet about CRC and HCV screening in English or Spanish and access to stool DNA testing and HCV screening among 350 participants. The primary outcome is both CRC and HCV screening uptake at 12 months post-intervention among 350 participants. System-wide CRC and HCV screening rates among patients 45-75 years old also will be monitored. Implementation barriers and facilitators will be examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The project is ongoing; effectiveness and implementation outcomes will be determined following study completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results may inform potential subsequent scale-up and offer insights for promoting multiple screening behaviors in a single intervention.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials identifier: </strong>NCT06745895 (date registered: 2024-12-20); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06745895?cond=CRC%20AND%20HCV&rank=.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146200393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Screen-and-treat in trauma for opioid misuse prevention using an adaptive intervention (STOMP-AI): Protocol for a pilot sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial 使用适应性干预预防阿片类药物滥用的创伤筛查和治疗(STOMP-AI):一项先导顺序、多任务、随机试验方案
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108255
M. Horton David , L. Leinweber David , Salihu Ejura , Sarwar Tehseen , Muller Hannah , Trevino Colleen , Zaborek Jen , Chen Guanhua , Quanbeck Andrew , Somers Tamara , Almirall Daniel , Zarzaur Ben , T. Brown Randall

Background

Approximately 75% of individuals hospitalized for traumatic injury receive prescription opioids and experience poorly controlled pain, psychological distress, and polysubstance use, placing these individuals at elevated risk for opioid misuse.
Risk factors for opioid misuse vary considerably, following traumatic injury, suggesting similarly variable responses to risk-mitigation attempts. Such heterogeneity necessitates the development of an adaptive intervention, yet no previous trials have evaluated the feasibility of researching nor delivering adaptive interventions to mitigate pain and misuse-related risk, in this population.

Methods

A pilot sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART) will be conducted to determine the feasibility of delivering an adaptive intervention initiated within one week of hospital discharge, comprising opioid risk monitoring, trauma care coordination, and pain coping skills training for patients hospitalized for traumatic injury. 107 patients across two Level I trauma centers will be included in the study. Feasibility of conducting the proposed SMART will also be evaluated, including processes for recruitment, retention, randomization and re-randomization, data collection, and qualitative methods. Self-report research surveys, clinical and research visit tracking, fidelity, and qualitative data will be collected at multiple timepoints throughout the trial to inform feasibility and acceptability of the adaptive intervention's components.

Anticipated results

Pilot data will be used to ensure the feasibility and acceptability of the adaptive intervention components, as well as the SMART design.

Discussion

Pilot data will be used to develop and refine a manualized adaptive intervention, as well as a fully developed SMART protocol, for optimization-effectiveness testing in a future, full-scale trial.

Trial registration

Registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06527599).
背景:大约75%因创伤性损伤住院的个体接受处方阿片类药物治疗,并经历控制不佳的疼痛、心理困扰和多种物质使用,使这些个体面临阿片类药物滥用的高风险。在创伤性损伤后,阿片类药物滥用的危险因素差异很大,这表明对减轻风险的尝试的反应也同样不同。这种异质性需要适应性干预的发展,但之前没有试验评估研究或提供适应性干预的可行性,以减轻这一人群的疼痛和滥用相关风险。方法进行一项先导顺序、多任务随机试验(SMART),以确定在出院一周内启动适应性干预的可行性,包括阿片类药物风险监测、创伤护理协调和创伤性损伤住院患者疼痛应对技能培训。来自两个一级创伤中心的107名患者将被纳入研究。还将评估实施拟议的SMART的可行性,包括招聘、保留、随机化和再随机化、数据收集和定性方法的过程。自我报告研究调查、临床和研究访问跟踪、保真度和定性数据将在整个试验期间的多个时间点收集,以告知适应性干预组成部分的可行性和可接受性。预期结果将使用ot数据来确保自适应干预组件以及SMART设计的可行性和可接受性。试点数据将用于开发和完善手动自适应干预措施,以及完全开发的SMART协议,以便在未来的全面试验中进行优化有效性测试。在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT06527599)。
{"title":"Screen-and-treat in trauma for opioid misuse prevention using an adaptive intervention (STOMP-AI): Protocol for a pilot sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial","authors":"M. Horton David ,&nbsp;L. Leinweber David ,&nbsp;Salihu Ejura ,&nbsp;Sarwar Tehseen ,&nbsp;Muller Hannah ,&nbsp;Trevino Colleen ,&nbsp;Zaborek Jen ,&nbsp;Chen Guanhua ,&nbsp;Quanbeck Andrew ,&nbsp;Somers Tamara ,&nbsp;Almirall Daniel ,&nbsp;Zarzaur Ben ,&nbsp;T. Brown Randall","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108255","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108255","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately 75% of individuals hospitalized for traumatic injury receive prescription opioids and experience poorly controlled pain, psychological distress, and polysubstance use, placing these individuals at elevated risk for opioid misuse.</div><div>Risk factors for opioid misuse vary considerably, following traumatic injury, suggesting similarly variable responses to risk-mitigation attempts. Such heterogeneity necessitates the development of an adaptive intervention, yet no previous trials have evaluated the feasibility of researching nor delivering adaptive interventions to mitigate pain and misuse-related risk, in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pilot sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART) will be conducted to determine the feasibility of delivering an adaptive intervention initiated within one week of hospital discharge, comprising opioid risk monitoring, trauma care coordination, and pain coping skills training for patients hospitalized for traumatic injury. 107 patients across two Level I trauma centers will be included in the study. Feasibility of conducting the proposed SMART will also be evaluated, including processes for recruitment, retention, randomization and re-randomization, data collection, and qualitative methods. Self-report research surveys, clinical and research visit tracking, fidelity, and qualitative data will be collected at multiple timepoints throughout the trial to inform feasibility and acceptability of the adaptive intervention's components.</div></div><div><h3>Anticipated results</h3><div>Pilot data will be used to ensure the feasibility and acceptability of the adaptive intervention components, as well as the SMART design.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Pilot data will be used to develop and refine a manualized adaptive intervention, as well as a fully developed SMART protocol, for optimization-effectiveness testing in a future, full-scale trial.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>Registered with <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (NCT06527599).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 108255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146187611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trial design: Evaluating the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of time-restricted eating in pregnant women with obesity 试验设计:评估肥胖孕妇限时饮食的安全性、可行性和可接受性。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108257
Brittany DiPiazza , Bhumi Patel , Yanqiao Li , Adrienne Tardif , Lacey Pezley , Anisa Fought-Boudaia , Alana Steffen , Irina Buhimschi , Tristesse Burton , Krista Varady , Mary Dawn Koenig , Lisa Tussing-Humphreys

Background

In the United States (U.S.), approximately 15% of women of reproductive age have a body mass index (BMI) of at least 35.0 kg/m2, which is associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and fetal health outcomes. However, interventions targeting gestational weight gain have not improved perinatal health outcomes among this population, suggesting the need for innovation. Time-restricted eating (TRE) is an accessible eating pattern in which individuals consume food within a limited time frame each day. We hypothesize that TRE has the potential to optimize gestational weight gain and improve maternal cardiometabolic health and perinatal health outcomes among women with prenatal obesity.

Methods

We describe a randomized controlled pilot study of TRE among pregnant women with a pre-pregnancy BMI between 35 and 60 kg/m2. The study aims to enroll 60 participants. The study commences at 14 to ≤20 weeks gestational age and continues through labor and delivery. The TRE intervention includes an 8-h eating window (10 a.m. – 6 p.m. or 11 a.m. – 7 p.m.) during the 2nd trimester and a 10-h eating window (9 a.m. – 7 p.m. or 10 a.m. – 8 p.m.) during the 3rd trimester, for each day of the participants' enrollment in the study.

Results

The study will: 1) examine the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of TRE during pregnancy, 2) explore the impact of TRE on maternal body weight and cardiometabolic markers, and 3) explore the impact of TRE on perinatal health outcomes.

Conclusion

The primary outcomes of this study are focused on examining the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of TRE in pregnant women with class II and III obesity.
背景:在美国,大约15%的育龄妇女的身体质量指数(BMI)至少为35.0 kg/m2,这与母体和胎儿不良健康结局的风险增加有关。然而,针对妊娠期体重增加的干预措施并没有改善这一人群的围产期健康状况,这表明需要创新。限时饮食(TRE)是一种可接受的饮食模式,个人每天在有限的时间内进食。我们假设TRE有可能优化妊娠期体重增加,改善产前肥胖妇女的心脏代谢健康和围产期健康结果。方法:我们对孕前BMI在35 - 60 kg/m2之间的孕妇进行了一项随机对照的TRE试点研究。这项研究的目标是招募60名参与者。研究从14至≤20 周孕龄开始,并持续到分娩。TRE干预包括8小时进食窗口(上午10 )。- 6 点。或11 点。-下午7点 )和10小时进食窗口(上午9点 )。- 7 点。或10 点。- 8 p.m.),在参与者参加研究的每一天。结果:本研究将:1)检验妊娠期人工流产的安全性、可行性和可接受性;2)探讨人工流产对孕产妇体重和心脏代谢指标的影响;3)探讨人工流产对围产期健康结局的影响。结论:本研究的主要结果集中在检查妊娠II类和III类肥胖妇女使用TRE的安全性、可行性和可接受性。
{"title":"Trial design: Evaluating the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of time-restricted eating in pregnant women with obesity","authors":"Brittany DiPiazza ,&nbsp;Bhumi Patel ,&nbsp;Yanqiao Li ,&nbsp;Adrienne Tardif ,&nbsp;Lacey Pezley ,&nbsp;Anisa Fought-Boudaia ,&nbsp;Alana Steffen ,&nbsp;Irina Buhimschi ,&nbsp;Tristesse Burton ,&nbsp;Krista Varady ,&nbsp;Mary Dawn Koenig ,&nbsp;Lisa Tussing-Humphreys","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108257","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108257","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the United States (U.S.), approximately 15% of women of reproductive age have a body mass index (BMI) of at least 35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, which is associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and fetal health outcomes. However, interventions targeting gestational weight gain have not improved perinatal health outcomes among this population, suggesting the need for innovation. Time-restricted eating (TRE) is an accessible eating pattern in which individuals consume food within a limited time frame each day. We hypothesize that TRE has the potential to optimize gestational weight gain and improve maternal cardiometabolic health and perinatal health outcomes among women with prenatal obesity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We describe a randomized controlled pilot study of TRE among pregnant women with a pre-pregnancy BMI between 35 and 60 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The study aims to enroll 60 participants. The study commences at 14 to ≤20 weeks gestational age and continues through labor and delivery. The TRE intervention includes an 8-h eating window (10 a.m. – 6 p.m. or 11 a.m. – 7 p.m.) during the 2nd trimester and a 10-h eating window (9 a.m. – 7 p.m. or 10 a.m. – 8 p.m.) during the 3rd trimester, for each day of the participants' enrollment in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study will: 1) examine the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of TRE during pregnancy, 2) explore the impact of TRE on maternal body weight and cardiometabolic markers, and 3) explore the impact of TRE on perinatal health outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The primary outcomes of this study are focused on examining the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of TRE in pregnant women with class II and III obesity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 108257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146178006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reaching rural veterans: Applying mind-body skills for pain using a whole health telehealth intervention: The RAMP pilot study 接触农村退伍军人:使用整个健康远程医疗干预应用身心技能治疗疼痛:RAMP试点研究。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108254
Katherine Hadlandsmyth , Roni Evans , Brent D. Leininger , Brent C. Taylor , Lee J.S. Cross , Ann Bangerter , Emily M. Hagel Campbell , Alexander C. Haley , Mallory Mahaffey , Marianne S. Matthias , J. Stephanie L. Taylor , Diana J. Burgess

Purpose

The current study piloted a telehealth, multicomponent intervention for rural Veterans, to increase access to non-pharmacological approaches to managing chronic pain.

Methods

This single arm pilot study examined the feasibility of trialing the Reaching Rural Veterans: Applying Mind-Body Skills for Pain Using a Whole Health Telehealth Intervention (RAMP). RAMP consisted of an individual session followed by 11 facilitated group sessions (90-min each), that included expert-led educational and experiential physical exercise and mind-body skill-building videos. Feasibility was assessed using pre-specified milestones.
for recruitment and enrollment (N = 40), satisfaction (75%), fidelity (90%), intervention engagement (75%), and data collection (surveys of pain and health outcomes at 14 weeks, 80%).

Findings

The following milestones were met: 1) 40 rural VA patients with moderate to severe chronic pain were enrolled, 2) 90% of participants were satisfied with the intervention, and 3) facilitators delivered 100% of session activities 100% of the time. The following milestones were nearly met: 4) intervention engagement: 68% of Veterans engaged in at least 7 of 12 sessions, and 5) data collection: 75% survey completion at 14 weeks. Participants reported that the intervention supported their pain self-management capabilities, provided useful self-management opportunities and resources, and enhanced their motivation to self-manage their pain. Participant and other key stakeholders identified important areas for improvement.

Conclusions

Pilot results demonstrated that RAMP is feasible and acceptable to rural Veterans with chronic pain and helped identify optimization strategies to enhance future program engagement.
目的:目前的研究试点远程医疗,多成分干预农村退伍军人,以增加获得非药物方法来管理慢性疼痛。方法:本研究采用单臂先导试验的方法,考察了“接触农村退伍军人:运用身心技能治疗疼痛的全健康远程医疗干预”(RAMP)的可行性。RAMP包括一个单独的会议,然后是11个促进小组会议(每次90分钟),其中包括专家指导的教育和体验性体育锻炼以及身心技能建设视频。可行性评估使用预先指定的里程碑。招募和入组(N = 40)、满意度(75%)、保真度(90%)、干预参与度(75%)和数据收集(14 周疼痛和健康结果调查,80%)。研究结果:达到了以下里程碑:1)40名患有中度至重度慢性疼痛的农村VA患者入组,2)90%的参与者对干预感到满意,3)辅导员在100%的时间内提供了100%的会话活动。我们几乎达到了以下里程碑:4)参与干预:68%的退伍军人参与了12个疗程中的至少7个;5)数据收集:75%的调查在14 周内完成。参与者报告说,干预支持了他们的疼痛自我管理能力,提供了有用的自我管理机会和资源,并增强了他们自我管理疼痛的动机。参与者和其他关键利益相关者确定了需要改进的重要领域。结论:试点结果表明,RAMP对于患有慢性疼痛的农村退伍军人是可行和可接受的,并有助于确定优化策略,以提高未来项目的参与度。
{"title":"Reaching rural veterans: Applying mind-body skills for pain using a whole health telehealth intervention: The RAMP pilot study","authors":"Katherine Hadlandsmyth ,&nbsp;Roni Evans ,&nbsp;Brent D. Leininger ,&nbsp;Brent C. Taylor ,&nbsp;Lee J.S. Cross ,&nbsp;Ann Bangerter ,&nbsp;Emily M. Hagel Campbell ,&nbsp;Alexander C. Haley ,&nbsp;Mallory Mahaffey ,&nbsp;Marianne S. Matthias ,&nbsp;J. Stephanie L. Taylor ,&nbsp;Diana J. Burgess","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108254","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108254","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The current study piloted a telehealth, multicomponent intervention for rural Veterans, to increase access to non-pharmacological approaches to managing chronic pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single arm pilot study examined the feasibility of trialing the Reaching Rural Veterans: Applying Mind-Body Skills for Pain Using a Whole Health Telehealth Intervention (RAMP). RAMP consisted of an individual session followed by 11 facilitated group sessions (90-min each), that included expert-led educational and experiential physical exercise and mind-body skill-building videos. Feasibility was assessed using pre-specified milestones.</div><div>for recruitment and enrollment (<em>N</em> = 40), satisfaction (75%), fidelity (90%), intervention engagement (75%), and data collection (surveys of pain and health outcomes at 14 weeks, 80%).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The following milestones were met: 1) 40 rural VA patients with moderate to severe chronic pain were enrolled, 2) 90% of participants were satisfied with the intervention, and 3) facilitators delivered 100% of session activities 100% of the time. The following milestones were nearly met: 4) intervention engagement: 68% of Veterans engaged in at least 7 of 12 sessions, and 5) data collection: 75% survey completion at 14 weeks. Participants reported that the intervention supported their pain self-management capabilities, provided useful self-management opportunities and resources, and enhanced their motivation to self-manage their pain. Participant and other key stakeholders identified important areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pilot results demonstrated that RAMP is feasible and acceptable to rural Veterans with chronic pain and helped identify optimization strategies to enhance future program engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 108254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146156454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Contemporary clinical trials
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1