Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.108213
Diana Anena, Elizabeth Chappell, Rashidah Nazzinda, Cecilia Kiilu, Moses Chitsamatanga, Tiyara Arumugam, Alexandra Green, Cissy Kityo Mutuluuza, Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi, Abraham Siika, Moherndran Archary, Lungile Jafta, Stella Namukwaya, Janet Seeley, George Akabwai, Henry Mugerwa, Lisanne Bevers, David Burger, Simon Walker, Alasdair Bamford, Annabelle South, Naomi Apoto, Molly Bush, Margaret J Thomason, Ben Spittle, Deborah Ford, Adeodata R Kekitiinwa, Sarah L Pett
Background: Alternatives to daily oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) are important for adolescents with HIV (AHIV) to improve adherence and outcomes. Long-Acting-injectable (LAI) cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV) has demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety and strong patient preference in adults.
Methods: LATA is an ongoing randomised, open-label, 96-week, non-inferiority trial evaluating the efficacy, safety and acceptability of LAI CAB/RPV vs. daily oral therapy with tenofovir (disoproxil fumarate or alafenamide)/lamivudine/dolutegravir (TLD). Participants are virologically suppressed AHIV aged 12- < 20 years in Kenya/South Africa/Uganda/Zimbabwe. Randomisation was 1:1 to LAI CAB/RPV given once every 8 weeks (after optional oral lead-in) or daily oral TLD. The primary outcome is viral rebound (two consecutive viral loads ≥50 copies/mL by 96-weeks). Viral loads are measured every 24 weeks. The trial employs the Smooth Away From the Expected (SAFE) non-inferiority frontier, where the non-inferiority margin depends on the observed event rate in the control arm. Secondary outcomes include confirmed viral load ≥200 copies/mL by 96-weeks, HIV resistance, safety, patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness. LAI participants return to oral ART at confirmed viral load ≥200 copies/mL; LAI participants who become pregnant are given the choice to continue on LAI or to switch back to daily oral ART, with optional pharmacokinetic sampling during pregnancy and post-partum in both groups. Enrolment of 476 AHIV completed in April 2024. Results will be reported in 2026.
Conclusion: LATA is the first trial comparing the efficacy, safety and acceptability of LAI CAB/RPV to oral ART in AHIV, enrolled in Sub-Saharan Africa, using a programmatic approach to viral load testing.
Trial registration: This trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05154747).
{"title":"Trial design and enrolment characteristics of LATA (Long-Acting Treatment in Adolescents): A randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, 96-week trial evaluating the virological efficacy, safety, acceptability and quality-of-life of the dual long-acting injectable regimen cabotegravir/ rilpivirine compared to daily oral therapy in virologically suppressed adolescents with HIV-1 infection, aged 12 to <20 years, in Sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Diana Anena, Elizabeth Chappell, Rashidah Nazzinda, Cecilia Kiilu, Moses Chitsamatanga, Tiyara Arumugam, Alexandra Green, Cissy Kityo Mutuluuza, Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi, Abraham Siika, Moherndran Archary, Lungile Jafta, Stella Namukwaya, Janet Seeley, George Akabwai, Henry Mugerwa, Lisanne Bevers, David Burger, Simon Walker, Alasdair Bamford, Annabelle South, Naomi Apoto, Molly Bush, Margaret J Thomason, Ben Spittle, Deborah Ford, Adeodata R Kekitiinwa, Sarah L Pett","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.108213","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.108213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alternatives to daily oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) are important for adolescents with HIV (AHIV) to improve adherence and outcomes. Long-Acting-injectable (LAI) cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV) has demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety and strong patient preference in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LATA is an ongoing randomised, open-label, 96-week, non-inferiority trial evaluating the efficacy, safety and acceptability of LAI CAB/RPV vs. daily oral therapy with tenofovir (disoproxil fumarate or alafenamide)/lamivudine/dolutegravir (TLD). Participants are virologically suppressed AHIV aged 12- < 20 years in Kenya/South Africa/Uganda/Zimbabwe. Randomisation was 1:1 to LAI CAB/RPV given once every 8 weeks (after optional oral lead-in) or daily oral TLD. The primary outcome is viral rebound (two consecutive viral loads ≥50 copies/mL by 96-weeks). Viral loads are measured every 24 weeks. The trial employs the Smooth Away From the Expected (SAFE) non-inferiority frontier, where the non-inferiority margin depends on the observed event rate in the control arm. Secondary outcomes include confirmed viral load ≥200 copies/mL by 96-weeks, HIV resistance, safety, patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness. LAI participants return to oral ART at confirmed viral load ≥200 copies/mL; LAI participants who become pregnant are given the choice to continue on LAI or to switch back to daily oral ART, with optional pharmacokinetic sampling during pregnancy and post-partum in both groups. Enrolment of 476 AHIV completed in April 2024. Results will be reported in 2026.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LATA is the first trial comparing the efficacy, safety and acceptability of LAI CAB/RPV to oral ART in AHIV, enrolled in Sub-Saharan Africa, using a programmatic approach to viral load testing.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05154747).</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145942790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-21DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108262
Aleksandra E Olszewski, Rachel A Butler, Deepshikha C Ashana, Shannon Carson, Christopher E Cox, Catherine L Hough, David Y Hwang, David Maloney, Florian Mayr, Vidya Menon, Jay S Steingrub, Donald R Sullivan, Grace Vincent, Blair Wendlandt, Douglas White
Background: Patients, particularly those at the end of their lives, frequently receive goal-discordant care, and their surrogate decision-makers suffer long-term psychological injury. Contributors to these issues may include infrequent communication between clinicians and surrogates, failure to discuss prognosis, values, and treatment options that include comfort-focused care, and surrogates facing high-stakes decision-making while underprepared and overwhelmed psychologically and emotionally.
Design: This is a multicenter, patient-randomized efficacy trial of a multi-component intervention, versus usual care, for 370 incapacitated, critically ill adults at high risk of death or severe disability, and their surrogate decision-makers, from 7 hospitals across the United States.
Intervention: The intervention combines surrogate utilization of a digital Family Support Tool (FST) in real-time during their loved one's hospitalization with proactively scheduled family meetings, for which both surrogates and clinicians receive additional preparation, at set intervals during the ICU hospitalization. Those in the control arm will receive usual ICU care.
Outcomes: Our primary outcome is patient-centeredness of care, measured using the modified Patient Perceived Patient-Centeredness of Care (PPPC) scale. Secondary outcomes include surrogates' psychological symptom burden, communication and decision quality, and patients' health resource utilization and clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: This trial will provide robust evidence about the impact of combining the FST with increased and intentional communication, on patient, family, and health system outcomes for those hospitalized in the ICU.
{"title":"Protocol for a randomized trial of a scalable, interactive tool to support surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients.","authors":"Aleksandra E Olszewski, Rachel A Butler, Deepshikha C Ashana, Shannon Carson, Christopher E Cox, Catherine L Hough, David Y Hwang, David Maloney, Florian Mayr, Vidya Menon, Jay S Steingrub, Donald R Sullivan, Grace Vincent, Blair Wendlandt, Douglas White","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108262","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2026.108262","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients, particularly those at the end of their lives, frequently receive goal-discordant care, and their surrogate decision-makers suffer long-term psychological injury. Contributors to these issues may include infrequent communication between clinicians and surrogates, failure to discuss prognosis, values, and treatment options that include comfort-focused care, and surrogates facing high-stakes decision-making while underprepared and overwhelmed psychologically and emotionally.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a multicenter, patient-randomized efficacy trial of a multi-component intervention, versus usual care, for 370 incapacitated, critically ill adults at high risk of death or severe disability, and their surrogate decision-makers, from 7 hospitals across the United States.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention combines surrogate utilization of a digital Family Support Tool (FST) in real-time during their loved one's hospitalization with proactively scheduled family meetings, for which both surrogates and clinicians receive additional preparation, at set intervals during the ICU hospitalization. Those in the control arm will receive usual ICU care.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Our primary outcome is patient-centeredness of care, measured using the modified Patient Perceived Patient-Centeredness of Care (PPPC) scale. Secondary outcomes include surrogates' psychological symptom burden, communication and decision quality, and patients' health resource utilization and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial will provide robust evidence about the impact of combining the FST with increased and intentional communication, on patient, family, and health system outcomes for those hospitalized in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147275786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-20DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108261
Yu Kuei Lin, Emily Hepworth, Juniar Lucien, Annika Agni, Adam Martin-Schwarze, Sean Newman, Nicolle Marinec, James E Aikens, Catherine Spino, Rodica Pop-Busui, Jillian Strayhorn, Melissa DeJonckheere, Nicole de Zoysa, Stephanie A Amiel, John D Piette
Background: Despite advances in diabetes technology, hypoglycemia remains a major problem for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We developed HypoPals, a scalable digital behavioral intervention program comprised of two intervention components, (i) hypoglycemia symptom detection training ('SDT') and (ii) psychoeducation to address unhelpful hypoglycemia beliefs (Education Plus, 'ED+'), to improve hypoglycemia self-management in adults with T1D.
Methods: A 52-week pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility of a prospective decentralized 2 × 2 factorial trial with the following characteristics: participant recruitment from a national T1D patient registry; minimization randomization; and remote outcome data collection to evaluate the effectiveness of HypoPals intervention components. This pilot study's primary outcome was the number of participants needed to achieve 20 participants completing the intervention. Intervention acceptability was also assessed.
Results: Forty participants were randomized to receive 10 weeks of either SDT only; ED+ only; both; or usual care only. All participants completed the intervention. Thus, 20 participants were recruited to achieve 20 participants completing the intervention. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed across randomization groups. Retention was 98% at the 26- and 52-week follow-ups, and 98% of participants provided complete outcome data. The majority (88%) found HypoPals at least somewhat helpful. No adverse events were determined to be related to the intervention.
Conclusions: This pilot trial demonstrated the feasibility of both integrating multiple advanced trial strategies and the intervention's acceptability. Results supported the conduct of a large-scale, decentralized, factorial trial to evaluate HypoPals' effectiveness in reducing hypoglycemia in adults with T1D.
{"title":"A pilot trial of 'HypoPals': Assessing trial procedures feasibility and intervention acceptability for a prospective digital hypoglycemia behavioral intervention study.","authors":"Yu Kuei Lin, Emily Hepworth, Juniar Lucien, Annika Agni, Adam Martin-Schwarze, Sean Newman, Nicolle Marinec, James E Aikens, Catherine Spino, Rodica Pop-Busui, Jillian Strayhorn, Melissa DeJonckheere, Nicole de Zoysa, Stephanie A Amiel, John D Piette","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108261","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108261","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advances in diabetes technology, hypoglycemia remains a major problem for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We developed HypoPals, a scalable digital behavioral intervention program comprised of two intervention components, (i) hypoglycemia symptom detection training ('SDT') and (ii) psychoeducation to address unhelpful hypoglycemia beliefs (Education Plus, 'ED+'), to improve hypoglycemia self-management in adults with T1D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 52-week pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility of a prospective decentralized 2 × 2 factorial trial with the following characteristics: participant recruitment from a national T1D patient registry; minimization randomization; and remote outcome data collection to evaluate the effectiveness of HypoPals intervention components. This pilot study's primary outcome was the number of participants needed to achieve 20 participants completing the intervention. Intervention acceptability was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants were randomized to receive 10 weeks of either SDT only; ED+ only; both; or usual care only. All participants completed the intervention. Thus, 20 participants were recruited to achieve 20 participants completing the intervention. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed across randomization groups. Retention was 98% at the 26- and 52-week follow-ups, and 98% of participants provided complete outcome data. The majority (88%) found HypoPals at least somewhat helpful. No adverse events were determined to be related to the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot trial demonstrated the feasibility of both integrating multiple advanced trial strategies and the intervention's acceptability. Results supported the conduct of a large-scale, decentralized, factorial trial to evaluate HypoPals' effectiveness in reducing hypoglycemia in adults with T1D.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147269748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disorder with fluctuating weakness and substantial impact on quality of life (QoL). Despite advances in pharmacological treatment, patients often experience fatigue, anxiety, and reduced daily functioning. Adapted Physical Activity (APA) has shown benefits in chronic neuromuscular disorders, while Art Therapy (AT) has demonstrated positive psychosocial effects in neurological conditions. However, no studies have investigated the potential synergy of APA combined with AT in MG.
Methods: We designed a monocentric, prospective, randomized crossover pilot trial to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an integrated APA + AT program compared to APA alone. A total of 102 adult patients with MG will be recruited from Lille University Hospital and partner centers. Each participant will undergo two 6-week phases (APA only vs APA + AT), separated by a 46-week washout. Primary outcome is change in QoL (MG-QOL15) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include fatigue (FSS), anxiety and depression (HADS), activities of daily living (MG-ADL), physical function tests, physical activity (IPAQ, accelerometry), and psychosocial outcomes assessed through qualitative methods (interviews, ethnography, creative elicitation). Quantitative data will be analyzed with repeated-measures models; qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis.
Discussion: This trial will be the first to explore a combined APA + AT intervention in MG. By addressing both physical and psychosocial dimensions, the study may provide evidence for integrated, patient-centered care strategies in rare neuromuscular disorders. If feasible and effective, results could inform future multicenter trials and clinical practice.
背景:重症肌无力(MG)是一种罕见的自身免疫性疾病,具有波动性虚弱和对生活质量(QoL)的重大影响。尽管药物治疗取得了进展,但患者经常感到疲劳、焦虑和日常功能下降。适应性体育活动(APA)已显示出对慢性神经肌肉疾病的益处,而艺术疗法(AT)已显示出对神经系统疾病的积极心理社会影响。然而,没有研究调查APA联合AT在MG中的潜在协同作用。方法:我们设计了一项单中心、前瞻性、随机交叉试验,以评估综合APA + AT方案与单独APA方案相比的可行性和初步疗效。将从里尔大学医院和合作中心招募102名MG成年患者。每位参与者将经历两个为期6周的阶段(仅APA vs APA + AT),中间间隔46周的洗脱期。主要观察指标为3 个月时生活质量(MG-QOL15)的变化。次要结局包括疲劳(FSS)、焦虑和抑郁(HADS)、日常生活活动(MG-ADL)、身体功能测试、身体活动(IPAQ、加速度计)和通过定性方法(访谈、民族志、创造性启发)评估的社会心理结局。定量数据将用重复测量模型进行分析;将对定性数据进行专题分析。讨论:该试验将首次探索APA + AT联合干预MG。通过解决生理和心理两方面的问题,该研究可能为罕见神经肌肉疾病的综合、以患者为中心的护理策略提供证据。如果可行和有效,结果可以为未来的多中心试验和临床实践提供信息。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT07125105。
{"title":"Combined adapted physical activity and art-therapy intervention in myasthenia gravis: Study protocol for a randomized crossover pilot trial.","authors":"Célia Leclercq, Annie Archer, Fanny Ceccone, J B Davion, Hervé Devanne, Céline Tard, Alessandro Porrovecchio","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2026.108260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disorder with fluctuating weakness and substantial impact on quality of life (QoL). Despite advances in pharmacological treatment, patients often experience fatigue, anxiety, and reduced daily functioning. Adapted Physical Activity (APA) has shown benefits in chronic neuromuscular disorders, while Art Therapy (AT) has demonstrated positive psychosocial effects in neurological conditions. However, no studies have investigated the potential synergy of APA combined with AT in MG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a monocentric, prospective, randomized crossover pilot trial to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an integrated APA + AT program compared to APA alone. A total of 102 adult patients with MG will be recruited from Lille University Hospital and partner centers. Each participant will undergo two 6-week phases (APA only vs APA + AT), separated by a 46-week washout. Primary outcome is change in QoL (MG-QOL15) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include fatigue (FSS), anxiety and depression (HADS), activities of daily living (MG-ADL), physical function tests, physical activity (IPAQ, accelerometry), and psychosocial outcomes assessed through qualitative methods (interviews, ethnography, creative elicitation). Quantitative data will be analyzed with repeated-measures models; qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial will be the first to explore a combined APA + AT intervention in MG. By addressing both physical and psychosocial dimensions, the study may provide evidence for integrated, patient-centered care strategies in rare neuromuscular disorders. If feasible and effective, results could inform future multicenter trials and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07125105.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in China, with hypertension as the most common modifiable risk factor. Despite comprehensive primary care based on chronic disease management, patients' awareness of CVD risk and motivation for self-management remain suboptimal.
Methods: This study is a parallel-group, individually randomized controlled trial conducted within routine chronic disease management at a community health center in Kunshan, China. Approximately 400 adults aged 60 years and above with hypertension will be randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either a personalized Heart Age report with brief physician explanation or usual care. The primary outcome is CVD risk awareness at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in self-reported physical activity, diet, and medication adherence. An exploratory analysis of clinical indicators (blood pressure, glucose, lipids, BMI) will be conducted at 12 months. Implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, fidelity) will also be assessed.
Discussion: This pragmatic trial integrates a personalized Heart Age risk communication model into routine chronic disease management. By embedding brief, physician-delivered risk feedback within existing primary care workflows, the intervention seeks to improve patient awareness and encourage self-management behaviors without increasing resource burden. Findings will inform the feasibility and scalability of personalized risk communication strategies in low-resource primary care settings.
{"title":"Effectiveness and implementation of an embedded community-based heart-age risk education model (E-CHARM) in improving cardiovascular risk awareness and health behaviors among older adults with hypertension: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Guanzhou Wang, Yuxuan Huang, Boyuan Li, You Zuo, Weijing Song, Yaxi Li, Yuzhou Sun, Naifei Xue, Zuhui Wang, Tianyi Wang, Zhanran Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108258","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in China, with hypertension as the most common modifiable risk factor. Despite comprehensive primary care based on chronic disease management, patients' awareness of CVD risk and motivation for self-management remain suboptimal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a parallel-group, individually randomized controlled trial conducted within routine chronic disease management at a community health center in Kunshan, China. Approximately 400 adults aged 60 years and above with hypertension will be randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either a personalized Heart Age report with brief physician explanation or usual care. The primary outcome is CVD risk awareness at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in self-reported physical activity, diet, and medication adherence. An exploratory analysis of clinical indicators (blood pressure, glucose, lipids, BMI) will be conducted at 12 months. Implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, fidelity) will also be assessed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This pragmatic trial integrates a personalized Heart Age risk communication model into routine chronic disease management. By embedding brief, physician-delivered risk feedback within existing primary care workflows, the intervention seeks to improve patient awareness and encourage self-management behaviors without increasing resource burden. Findings will inform the feasibility and scalability of personalized risk communication strategies in low-resource primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration numbers: </strong>NCT07045363.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146225777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108259
Christine A March, Scott Rothenberger, Elissa Naame, Victoria Stouffer, Christine Moon, Aaron R Lyon, Ingrid Libman, Elizabeth Miller
Background: Despite advances in treatments, children with type 1 diabetes struggle to achieve glycemic targets. Though school-based programs may help support families to achieve targets, challenges remain with coordinating care between health systems and schools, where students spend much of their day. Monthly, virtual meetings between a parent, school nurse, and a diabetes specialist may bridge this gap by using a shared treatment plan to meet goals.
Methods: This is a pilot cluster-randomized trial to test a school-partnered collaborative care model (SPACE for T1D) for children aged 5-12 years with type 1 diabetes for ≥6 months. School districts were randomized in a 2:1 allocation ratio to the intervention (SPACE for T1D) or enhanced usual care. Participants complete the study over four consecutive months. Parents and school nurses evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and usability of SPACE using valid questionnaires. The study team monitors retention, fidelity, and practicality. Exploratory outcomes assess change in glycemia, care utilization, type 1 diabetes-related quality of life, self-efficacy skills, and missed class time due to diabetes interventions.
Results: Twelve school districts were randomized. One dropped out due to no eligible students, leaving 11 participating districts. We approached 46 students; 30 provided consent for a recruitment rate of 65%.
Conclusions: This study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the SPACE for T1D intervention in varied school districts. Findings will facilitate a fully-powered trial to evaluate the impact on health and academic outcomes, adding to the evidence base of school-based interventions to support youth with chronic disease. NCT: NCT06420661.
背景:尽管治疗取得了进展,但1型糖尿病儿童仍难以达到血糖目标。虽然以学校为基础的项目可能有助于支持家庭实现目标,但在协调卫生系统和学校之间的护理方面仍然存在挑战,因为学生每天的大部分时间都在学校度过。家长、学校护士和糖尿病专家之间每月的虚拟会议可以通过使用共同的治疗计划来实现目标,从而弥合这种差距。方法:这是一项试验性集群随机试验,旨在测试一种学校合作的T1D护理模式(SPACE for T1D),用于治疗年龄在5-12 岁、1型糖尿病患者≥6 个月的儿童。学区以2:1的分配比例随机分配到干预(T1D的空间)或增强的常规护理。参与者在连续四个月的时间里完成这项研究。家长和学校护士使用有效问卷评估空间的可行性、可接受性、适当性和可用性。研究团队监控留存率、保真度和实用性。探索性结果评估血糖、护理利用、1型糖尿病相关生活质量、自我效能技能和因糖尿病干预导致的缺课时间的变化。结果:12个学区被随机化。由于没有符合条件的学生,一个地区退出了,剩下11个参与地区。我们接触了46名学生;30人同意65%的招聘率。结论:本研究将评估空间在不同学区进行T1D干预的可行性和可接受性。研究结果将促进一项全面有力的试验,以评估对健康和学业成果的影响,增加以学校为基础的干预措施的证据基础,以支持患有慢性疾病的青少年。NCT: NCT06420661。
{"title":"School-partnered collaborative care intervention for young children with type 1 diabetes: A pilot and feasibility protocol.","authors":"Christine A March, Scott Rothenberger, Elissa Naame, Victoria Stouffer, Christine Moon, Aaron R Lyon, Ingrid Libman, Elizabeth Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108259","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advances in treatments, children with type 1 diabetes struggle to achieve glycemic targets. Though school-based programs may help support families to achieve targets, challenges remain with coordinating care between health systems and schools, where students spend much of their day. Monthly, virtual meetings between a parent, school nurse, and a diabetes specialist may bridge this gap by using a shared treatment plan to meet goals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a pilot cluster-randomized trial to test a school-partnered collaborative care model (SPACE for T1D) for children aged 5-12 years with type 1 diabetes for ≥6 months. School districts were randomized in a 2:1 allocation ratio to the intervention (SPACE for T1D) or enhanced usual care. Participants complete the study over four consecutive months. Parents and school nurses evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and usability of SPACE using valid questionnaires. The study team monitors retention, fidelity, and practicality. Exploratory outcomes assess change in glycemia, care utilization, type 1 diabetes-related quality of life, self-efficacy skills, and missed class time due to diabetes interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve school districts were randomized. One dropped out due to no eligible students, leaving 11 participating districts. We approached 46 students; 30 provided consent for a recruitment rate of 65%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the SPACE for T1D intervention in varied school districts. Findings will facilitate a fully-powered trial to evaluate the impact on health and academic outcomes, adding to the evidence base of school-based interventions to support youth with chronic disease. NCT: NCT06420661.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146218942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-13DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108256
Rania Abdulla, Carol Boxtha, Emily P Courtney, Oyedolapo A Anyanwu, Steven K Sutton, Katherine Chung-Bridges, Hirut G Kassaye, Elizabeth Philippe, Kelly A Mudon, Estefany Frias, Daniel Parras, Natasha Avrilien, Mark Friedman, Kea Turner, Gloria D Coronado, Victoria L Champion, Jonathan N Tobin, Susan T Vadaparampil, Clement K Gwede, Shannon M Christy
Background: The current paper describes the protocol for the Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial titled Multilevel Action Toward Colorectal Cancer and Hepatitis C Education and Screening (MATCHES). The aims of the MATCHES intervention trial are to promote both colorectal cancer (CRC) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening among patients aged 45-75 years old receiving primary care at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) who are not currently up-to-date with both screenings and to examine implementation outcomes.
Methods: Ten health center sites in the FQHC will be randomized in two waves using a stepped wedge design. Intervention strategies target the system, clinician, and patient levels. System-level strategies include a customized electronic health record best practice alert that pairs CRC and HCV screening and standard operating procedures. Clinician-level strategies include a training session and feedback on screening rates. Patient-level strategies include a theory-informed educational booklet about CRC and HCV screening in English or Spanish and access to stool DNA testing and HCV screening among 350 participants. The primary outcome is both CRC and HCV screening uptake at 12 months post-intervention among 350 participants. System-wide CRC and HCV screening rates among patients 45-75 years old also will be monitored. Implementation barriers and facilitators will be examined.
Results: The project is ongoing; effectiveness and implementation outcomes will be determined following study completion.
Conclusions: Results may inform potential subsequent scale-up and offer insights for promoting multiple screening behaviors in a single intervention.
{"title":"Multilevel Action Toward Colorectal Cancer and Hepatitis C Education and Screening (MATCHES): Study protocol for a hybrid 1 stepped-wedge multibehavioral randomized trial.","authors":"Rania Abdulla, Carol Boxtha, Emily P Courtney, Oyedolapo A Anyanwu, Steven K Sutton, Katherine Chung-Bridges, Hirut G Kassaye, Elizabeth Philippe, Kelly A Mudon, Estefany Frias, Daniel Parras, Natasha Avrilien, Mark Friedman, Kea Turner, Gloria D Coronado, Victoria L Champion, Jonathan N Tobin, Susan T Vadaparampil, Clement K Gwede, Shannon M Christy","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108256","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current paper describes the protocol for the Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial titled Multilevel Action Toward Colorectal Cancer and Hepatitis C Education and Screening (MATCHES). The aims of the MATCHES intervention trial are to promote both colorectal cancer (CRC) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening among patients aged 45-75 years old receiving primary care at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) who are not currently up-to-date with both screenings and to examine implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten health center sites in the FQHC will be randomized in two waves using a stepped wedge design. Intervention strategies target the system, clinician, and patient levels. System-level strategies include a customized electronic health record best practice alert that pairs CRC and HCV screening and standard operating procedures. Clinician-level strategies include a training session and feedback on screening rates. Patient-level strategies include a theory-informed educational booklet about CRC and HCV screening in English or Spanish and access to stool DNA testing and HCV screening among 350 participants. The primary outcome is both CRC and HCV screening uptake at 12 months post-intervention among 350 participants. System-wide CRC and HCV screening rates among patients 45-75 years old also will be monitored. Implementation barriers and facilitators will be examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The project is ongoing; effectiveness and implementation outcomes will be determined following study completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results may inform potential subsequent scale-up and offer insights for promoting multiple screening behaviors in a single intervention.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials identifier: </strong>NCT06745895 (date registered: 2024-12-20); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06745895?cond=CRC%20AND%20HCV&rank=.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"108256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146200393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-11DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108255
M. Horton David , L. Leinweber David , Salihu Ejura , Sarwar Tehseen , Muller Hannah , Trevino Colleen , Zaborek Jen , Chen Guanhua , Quanbeck Andrew , Somers Tamara , Almirall Daniel , Zarzaur Ben , T. Brown Randall
Background
Approximately 75% of individuals hospitalized for traumatic injury receive prescription opioids and experience poorly controlled pain, psychological distress, and polysubstance use, placing these individuals at elevated risk for opioid misuse.
Risk factors for opioid misuse vary considerably, following traumatic injury, suggesting similarly variable responses to risk-mitigation attempts. Such heterogeneity necessitates the development of an adaptive intervention, yet no previous trials have evaluated the feasibility of researching nor delivering adaptive interventions to mitigate pain and misuse-related risk, in this population.
Methods
A pilot sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART) will be conducted to determine the feasibility of delivering an adaptive intervention initiated within one week of hospital discharge, comprising opioid risk monitoring, trauma care coordination, and pain coping skills training for patients hospitalized for traumatic injury. 107 patients across two Level I trauma centers will be included in the study. Feasibility of conducting the proposed SMART will also be evaluated, including processes for recruitment, retention, randomization and re-randomization, data collection, and qualitative methods. Self-report research surveys, clinical and research visit tracking, fidelity, and qualitative data will be collected at multiple timepoints throughout the trial to inform feasibility and acceptability of the adaptive intervention's components.
Anticipated results
Pilot data will be used to ensure the feasibility and acceptability of the adaptive intervention components, as well as the SMART design.
Discussion
Pilot data will be used to develop and refine a manualized adaptive intervention, as well as a fully developed SMART protocol, for optimization-effectiveness testing in a future, full-scale trial.
{"title":"Screen-and-treat in trauma for opioid misuse prevention using an adaptive intervention (STOMP-AI): Protocol for a pilot sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial","authors":"M. Horton David , L. Leinweber David , Salihu Ejura , Sarwar Tehseen , Muller Hannah , Trevino Colleen , Zaborek Jen , Chen Guanhua , Quanbeck Andrew , Somers Tamara , Almirall Daniel , Zarzaur Ben , T. Brown Randall","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108255","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108255","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately 75% of individuals hospitalized for traumatic injury receive prescription opioids and experience poorly controlled pain, psychological distress, and polysubstance use, placing these individuals at elevated risk for opioid misuse.</div><div>Risk factors for opioid misuse vary considerably, following traumatic injury, suggesting similarly variable responses to risk-mitigation attempts. Such heterogeneity necessitates the development of an adaptive intervention, yet no previous trials have evaluated the feasibility of researching nor delivering adaptive interventions to mitigate pain and misuse-related risk, in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pilot sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART) will be conducted to determine the feasibility of delivering an adaptive intervention initiated within one week of hospital discharge, comprising opioid risk monitoring, trauma care coordination, and pain coping skills training for patients hospitalized for traumatic injury. 107 patients across two Level I trauma centers will be included in the study. Feasibility of conducting the proposed SMART will also be evaluated, including processes for recruitment, retention, randomization and re-randomization, data collection, and qualitative methods. Self-report research surveys, clinical and research visit tracking, fidelity, and qualitative data will be collected at multiple timepoints throughout the trial to inform feasibility and acceptability of the adaptive intervention's components.</div></div><div><h3>Anticipated results</h3><div>Pilot data will be used to ensure the feasibility and acceptability of the adaptive intervention components, as well as the SMART design.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Pilot data will be used to develop and refine a manualized adaptive intervention, as well as a fully developed SMART protocol, for optimization-effectiveness testing in a future, full-scale trial.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>Registered with <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (NCT06527599).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 108255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146187611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108257
Brittany DiPiazza , Bhumi Patel , Yanqiao Li , Adrienne Tardif , Lacey Pezley , Anisa Fought-Boudaia , Alana Steffen , Irina Buhimschi , Tristesse Burton , Krista Varady , Mary Dawn Koenig , Lisa Tussing-Humphreys
Background
In the United States (U.S.), approximately 15% of women of reproductive age have a body mass index (BMI) of at least 35.0 kg/m2, which is associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and fetal health outcomes. However, interventions targeting gestational weight gain have not improved perinatal health outcomes among this population, suggesting the need for innovation. Time-restricted eating (TRE) is an accessible eating pattern in which individuals consume food within a limited time frame each day. We hypothesize that TRE has the potential to optimize gestational weight gain and improve maternal cardiometabolic health and perinatal health outcomes among women with prenatal obesity.
Methods
We describe a randomized controlled pilot study of TRE among pregnant women with a pre-pregnancy BMI between 35 and 60 kg/m2. The study aims to enroll 60 participants. The study commences at 14 to ≤20 weeks gestational age and continues through labor and delivery. The TRE intervention includes an 8-h eating window (10 a.m. – 6 p.m. or 11 a.m. – 7 p.m.) during the 2nd trimester and a 10-h eating window (9 a.m. – 7 p.m. or 10 a.m. – 8 p.m.) during the 3rd trimester, for each day of the participants' enrollment in the study.
Results
The study will: 1) examine the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of TRE during pregnancy, 2) explore the impact of TRE on maternal body weight and cardiometabolic markers, and 3) explore the impact of TRE on perinatal health outcomes.
Conclusion
The primary outcomes of this study are focused on examining the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of TRE in pregnant women with class II and III obesity.
{"title":"Trial design: Evaluating the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of time-restricted eating in pregnant women with obesity","authors":"Brittany DiPiazza , Bhumi Patel , Yanqiao Li , Adrienne Tardif , Lacey Pezley , Anisa Fought-Boudaia , Alana Steffen , Irina Buhimschi , Tristesse Burton , Krista Varady , Mary Dawn Koenig , Lisa Tussing-Humphreys","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108257","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108257","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the United States (U.S.), approximately 15% of women of reproductive age have a body mass index (BMI) of at least 35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, which is associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and fetal health outcomes. However, interventions targeting gestational weight gain have not improved perinatal health outcomes among this population, suggesting the need for innovation. Time-restricted eating (TRE) is an accessible eating pattern in which individuals consume food within a limited time frame each day. We hypothesize that TRE has the potential to optimize gestational weight gain and improve maternal cardiometabolic health and perinatal health outcomes among women with prenatal obesity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We describe a randomized controlled pilot study of TRE among pregnant women with a pre-pregnancy BMI between 35 and 60 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The study aims to enroll 60 participants. The study commences at 14 to ≤20 weeks gestational age and continues through labor and delivery. The TRE intervention includes an 8-h eating window (10 a.m. – 6 p.m. or 11 a.m. – 7 p.m.) during the 2nd trimester and a 10-h eating window (9 a.m. – 7 p.m. or 10 a.m. – 8 p.m.) during the 3rd trimester, for each day of the participants' enrollment in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study will: 1) examine the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of TRE during pregnancy, 2) explore the impact of TRE on maternal body weight and cardiometabolic markers, and 3) explore the impact of TRE on perinatal health outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The primary outcomes of this study are focused on examining the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of TRE in pregnant women with class II and III obesity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 108257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146178006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-08DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108254
Katherine Hadlandsmyth , Roni Evans , Brent D. Leininger , Brent C. Taylor , Lee J.S. Cross , Ann Bangerter , Emily M. Hagel Campbell , Alexander C. Haley , Mallory Mahaffey , Marianne S. Matthias , J. Stephanie L. Taylor , Diana J. Burgess
Purpose
The current study piloted a telehealth, multicomponent intervention for rural Veterans, to increase access to non-pharmacological approaches to managing chronic pain.
Methods
This single arm pilot study examined the feasibility of trialing the Reaching Rural Veterans: Applying Mind-Body Skills for Pain Using a Whole Health Telehealth Intervention (RAMP). RAMP consisted of an individual session followed by 11 facilitated group sessions (90-min each), that included expert-led educational and experiential physical exercise and mind-body skill-building videos. Feasibility was assessed using pre-specified milestones.
for recruitment and enrollment (N = 40), satisfaction (75%), fidelity (90%), intervention engagement (75%), and data collection (surveys of pain and health outcomes at 14 weeks, 80%).
Findings
The following milestones were met: 1) 40 rural VA patients with moderate to severe chronic pain were enrolled, 2) 90% of participants were satisfied with the intervention, and 3) facilitators delivered 100% of session activities 100% of the time. The following milestones were nearly met: 4) intervention engagement: 68% of Veterans engaged in at least 7 of 12 sessions, and 5) data collection: 75% survey completion at 14 weeks. Participants reported that the intervention supported their pain self-management capabilities, provided useful self-management opportunities and resources, and enhanced their motivation to self-manage their pain. Participant and other key stakeholders identified important areas for improvement.
Conclusions
Pilot results demonstrated that RAMP is feasible and acceptable to rural Veterans with chronic pain and helped identify optimization strategies to enhance future program engagement.
{"title":"Reaching rural veterans: Applying mind-body skills for pain using a whole health telehealth intervention: The RAMP pilot study","authors":"Katherine Hadlandsmyth , Roni Evans , Brent D. Leininger , Brent C. Taylor , Lee J.S. Cross , Ann Bangerter , Emily M. Hagel Campbell , Alexander C. Haley , Mallory Mahaffey , Marianne S. Matthias , J. Stephanie L. Taylor , Diana J. Burgess","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108254","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108254","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The current study piloted a telehealth, multicomponent intervention for rural Veterans, to increase access to non-pharmacological approaches to managing chronic pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single arm pilot study examined the feasibility of trialing the Reaching Rural Veterans: Applying Mind-Body Skills for Pain Using a Whole Health Telehealth Intervention (RAMP). RAMP consisted of an individual session followed by 11 facilitated group sessions (90-min each), that included expert-led educational and experiential physical exercise and mind-body skill-building videos. Feasibility was assessed using pre-specified milestones.</div><div>for recruitment and enrollment (<em>N</em> = 40), satisfaction (75%), fidelity (90%), intervention engagement (75%), and data collection (surveys of pain and health outcomes at 14 weeks, 80%).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The following milestones were met: 1) 40 rural VA patients with moderate to severe chronic pain were enrolled, 2) 90% of participants were satisfied with the intervention, and 3) facilitators delivered 100% of session activities 100% of the time. The following milestones were nearly met: 4) intervention engagement: 68% of Veterans engaged in at least 7 of 12 sessions, and 5) data collection: 75% survey completion at 14 weeks. Participants reported that the intervention supported their pain self-management capabilities, provided useful self-management opportunities and resources, and enhanced their motivation to self-manage their pain. Participant and other key stakeholders identified important areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pilot results demonstrated that RAMP is feasible and acceptable to rural Veterans with chronic pain and helped identify optimization strategies to enhance future program engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 108254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146156454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}