Scope: ClinicalTrials.gov serves as a key resource for information on ongoing and completed clinical trials. To advance equitable promotion and broaden access, the Clinical Trials Search Tool (CTST) was developed to build on ClinicalTrials.gov data, offering a more comprehensive index with user-friendly geospatial, demographic, and socioeconomic features.
Aim: To create a web-based Clinical Trials Search Tool (CTST) that builds on ClinicalTrials.gov data, offering custom querying, reporting functions, and interactive geospatial mapping capabilities.
Methods: The CTST was built using a rapid, iterative, feedback-driven Agile approach. Its front-end client, developed in Svelte and TypeScript with the SvelteKit framework and Tailwind CSS UI library, supports detailed search specifications and result rendering. Iterative means user-driven refinement of queries, adjusting keywords, filters, and geography based on results. This workflow enables dynamic exploration and optimization of feasibility queries. The back-end server, implemented in Java with Spring Boot framework, processes searches and delivers ranked results, storing application data in a PostgreSQL database. Communication occurs through the server's REST API via asynchronous HTTP requests with JSON-serialized data.
Results: The CTST, equipped with a Toggle Advanced Search button, provides an easy-to-use interface for specifying input search criteria, allowing users to customize their selection. An interactive geospatial map renders the returned results as listings that summarize clinical trials in a tabular form, several layers that integrate population density, racial and ethnic demographics, and socioeconomic details.
Conclusion: The CTST builds on the ClinicalTrials.gov database, integrating geospatial, demographic, and socioeconomic dimensions to support advanced research and maximize its value for clinicians and investigators.
Background: Rural communities continue to experience high overdose mortality rates and challenges retaining individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). The most recent formulation of injectable extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) may improve treatment engagement and outcomes for people with OUD.
Objectives: The RXR study (CTN-0102XR) aims to evaluate the feasibility of implementing XR-BUP in rural settings, acceptability of XR-BUP to clinic staff and patients, and effectiveness of XR-BUP compared with sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (SL-BUP).
Study design and methods: This is an open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) using intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Approximately 144 participants recruited from seven rural clinic sites will be randomized to receive XR-BUP or SL-BUP in a ratio of 2:1, and will receive study medication for 14 weeks. Participants in the XR-BUP condition will receive two weekly initiation dosages, followed by the target monthly dosage (128 mg) at Weeks 2, 6, and 10. Participants in the SL-BUP condition will receive medication on a similar schedule, with a target dose range of 16-24 mg/day. The main comparative effectiveness outcome measure is the number of monthly opioid negative urine drug screens (UDS) for non-prescribed opioids from Weeks 2-14. Feasibility and acceptability will be evaluated using mixed methods, combining participant survey and interview data from clinic administrators, providers, and patients.
Conclusions: If demonstrated to be feasible and acceptable to participants and staff and there is evidence of effectiveness for people with OUD in reducing opioid use, XR-BUP may be considered an important option for addressing OUD in rural settings.
Clinicaltrials: gov Identifier: NCT06023459.
Emerging adults are disproportionately at risk for substance misuse and assault injury. Assault-injured emerging adults with substance misuse have increased risk of morbidity and mortality compared to those without and often receive care in the Emergency Department (ED). This manuscript describes the development of a protocol for a pilot randomized trial of an adapted brief behavioral intervention, the Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI), for use among assault-injured emerging adults with alcohol and/or cannabis misuse presenting to the ED. First, we will perform a mixed methods study of assault-injured emerging adults with alcohol and/or cannabis misuse to elicit the shared psychosocial risk factors that contribute to both alcohol and/or cannabis misuse in the context of assault injury. We will then use these data to adapt the BNI for use among assault-injured emerging adults with alcohol and/or cannabis misuse. We will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted BNI in a randomized trial in the ED setting (N = 50). This pilot study is a critical initial step in developing an effective brief behavioral intervention for reducing alcohol and cannabis use among assault-injured emerging adults. Trial Registration Number NCT07070414.
Background: High-quality conduct of clinical trials depends on strict adherence to both regulatory protocols and trial-specific procedures to ensure data integrity and participant safety. Standard methods utilized to train research staff have limitations, including lack of specificity and declining impact over time. We developed a Supplemental, Reinforced, Risk-Based Training (SRRBT) program, designed to target study-specific challenges and provide ongoing reinforcement. Our objective was to evaluate whether SRRBT improves protocol adherence.
Methods: SRRBT was executed as a cluster-randomized, educational implementation study embedded in a multicenter clinical trial. We compared standard training with and without the addition of SRRBT across 23 clinical sites. SRRBT consisted of five interactive electronic vignettes focusing on trial-specific competencies. The primary outcome was the proportion of eligible participants approached for study participation. Secondary outcomes included consent and enrollment rates, protocol deviations, and completeness of study documentation.
Results: Approach rates immediately following training trended higher at SRRBT sites compared to those receiving standard training alone (OR = 3.98, 95% CI [0.87, 18.17], p = 0.074); however, this difference was not statistically significant and attenuated over time, with odds ratios of 2.24 (95% CI [0.78, 6.49], p = 0.14) at six months and 1.38 (95% CI [0.53, 3.59], p = 0.51) at 12 months post-training.
Conclusions: SRRBT shows potential in enhancing early site-level protocol adherence but may require ongoing reinforcement to sustain benefits over time. This study highlights the need for continuous, adaptive training approaches in complex clinical trials to maintain high standards of protocol adherence.
Anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders are common among children and adolescents and, if left untreated, can lead to further psychiatric morbidity and impairment. Practical barriers, such as financial constraints, limited availability of therapists, and time limitations of families, may impede access to evidence-based treatments. Low-intensity treatments show promise in addressing these barriers while conserving resources for those who require additional support. However, further empirical evidence is needed regarding the comparative efficacy of different interventions. To address this gap, we detail the protocol for a randomized controlled trial that compares the effectiveness of three different low-intensity therapy interventions - internet guided cognitive-behavioral therapy, parent-led treatment, and relaxation therapy - and explores the underlying mechanisms of each.
Background: Medicaid-enrolled populations are disproportionately impacted by suboptimal dietary intake leading to a high prevalence of Stage 2 cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome (CKMS), and lower Life's Essential 8 (LE8) cardiovascular health (CVH) measures.
Methods: A pilot randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility, engagement, and preliminary efficacy of a novel Food-is-Medicine (FIM) intervention in Medicaid-enrolled adults with Stage 2 CKMS.
Setting: Participants were recruited from an academic medical center in an urban environment in the Midwest.
Design: Parallel group design.
Interventions: SUSTAIN tests a phased-approach over 24 weeks: Weeks 1-8: Instacart food vouchers (known as Fresh Funds) and home delivery, behavioral nutrition counseling and culinary education, community health worker (CHW)-led social needs coordination, and produce prescription via Mid-Ohio Farmacy (MOF) access; Weeks 9-16: study supported Instacart platform access without the vouchers (Fresh Funds), while other components remain the same; Weeks 17-24: option to continue Instacart without study support, counseling and culinary education cease, and MOF and CHW continue. Control participants receive the same intervention without counseling and culinary education or the CHW.
Outcomes: Primary and secondary outcomes include study enrollment, adherence to intervention components (i.e., total Instacart spending, counseling sessions, number of food pantry visits, linkage with CHW), retention across study visits, acceptability (i.e, satisfaction), practicality (i.e., participant costs), adaptations to the intervention, and efficacy (i.e., dietary patterns, nutrition security, American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8).
Discussion: Scalable FIM approaches to improve CVH in individuals with Stage 2 CKMS are needed to inform inclusive and impactful interventions to address nutrition security.
Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT06589336.

