Does corruption have a sanding or greasing impact on innovation? Reconciling the contrasting perspectives through a systematic literature review

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105036
Shoeb Mohammad , Jie Yang , Irfan Butt
{"title":"Does corruption have a sanding or greasing impact on innovation? Reconciling the contrasting perspectives through a systematic literature review","authors":"Shoeb Mohammad ,&nbsp;Jie Yang ,&nbsp;Irfan Butt","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There has been a significant increase in the number of academic studies published on the relationship between corruption and innovation in recent years. Various relationships have been conceptualized, including the “sand” and “grease” perspectives which propose that corruption reduces and increases innovation, respectively. In light of interest in the topic showing growing momentum, we review the literature on corruption and innovation for the purpose of reconciling these proposed theoretical perspectives. Following a systematic literature review methodology, we explain the composition of the literature and map the key conceptualizations of the corruption-innovation relationship. We link the variables, measures, and theories employed in the literature to proposed conceptual relationships. Furthermore, we outline the key patterns in which the sanding or greasing impact is more likely to be observed. Based on the systematic review, we propose a research agenda for corruption-innovation research and discuss policy implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000854","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been a significant increase in the number of academic studies published on the relationship between corruption and innovation in recent years. Various relationships have been conceptualized, including the “sand” and “grease” perspectives which propose that corruption reduces and increases innovation, respectively. In light of interest in the topic showing growing momentum, we review the literature on corruption and innovation for the purpose of reconciling these proposed theoretical perspectives. Following a systematic literature review methodology, we explain the composition of the literature and map the key conceptualizations of the corruption-innovation relationship. We link the variables, measures, and theories employed in the literature to proposed conceptual relationships. Furthermore, we outline the key patterns in which the sanding or greasing impact is more likely to be observed. Based on the systematic review, we propose a research agenda for corruption-innovation research and discuss policy implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腐败对创新的影响是 "打磨 "还是 "润滑"?通过系统的文献综述调和截然不同的观点
近年来,关于腐败与创新之间关系的学术研究数量大幅增加。人们对二者之间的关系提出了各种概念,包括 "沙子 "和 "油脂 "观点,它们分别认为腐败会减少和增加创新。鉴于人们对这一话题的兴趣日益浓厚,我们回顾了有关腐败与创新的文献,以调和这些理论观点。按照系统的文献综述方法,我们解释了文献的构成,并绘制了腐败与创新关系的主要概念图。我们将文献中采用的变量、衡量标准和理论与提出的概念关系联系起来。此外,我们还概述了更有可能观察到 "打磨 "或 "润滑 "影响的关键模式。在系统回顾的基础上,我们提出了腐败与创新研究的研究议程,并讨论了政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Research-targeting, spillovers, and the direction of science: Evidence from HIV research-funding Unexpectedness in medical research Path release among practices in the process of path constitution: How the MP3-path appeared in the field of recorded music Missing women in STEM occupations: The impact of university education on the gender gap in graduates' transition to work Public interest v.s. special interest: The strategic framing tactics of technologies in the political arena
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1