Policy uncertainty, bad news disclosure, and stock price crash risk

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Empirical Finance Pub Date : 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jempfin.2024.101512
Jeong-Bon Kim , Kevin Tseng , Jundong (Jeff) Wang , Yaoyi Xi
{"title":"Policy uncertainty, bad news disclosure, and stock price crash risk","authors":"Jeong-Bon Kim ,&nbsp;Kevin Tseng ,&nbsp;Jundong (Jeff) Wang ,&nbsp;Yaoyi Xi","doi":"10.1016/j.jempfin.2024.101512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper documents that economic policy uncertainty reduces future stock price crash risk by increasing firms’ disclosure of bad news. Our tests show that firms release more bad news during periods of high policy uncertainty – they use more conservatism accounting, exhibit stronger future earnings response coefficients, use more negative tones in their financial reports, and have managers that express more negative sentiment in earnings conference calls than during periods of low policy uncertainty. Additional analyses show that the negative relation between EPU and future stock price crash risk is more pronounced among firms with more short-sale constraints, with no actively traded credit default swap contracts, with lower options-implied negative skewness, or with higher firm-level political risks. The results from regressions adopting the instrumental variable approach and from a quasi-natural experiment suggest that the negative relation observed between policy uncertainty and stock price crash risk is unlikely to be driven by potential endogeneity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Finance","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101512"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539824000471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper documents that economic policy uncertainty reduces future stock price crash risk by increasing firms’ disclosure of bad news. Our tests show that firms release more bad news during periods of high policy uncertainty – they use more conservatism accounting, exhibit stronger future earnings response coefficients, use more negative tones in their financial reports, and have managers that express more negative sentiment in earnings conference calls than during periods of low policy uncertainty. Additional analyses show that the negative relation between EPU and future stock price crash risk is more pronounced among firms with more short-sale constraints, with no actively traded credit default swap contracts, with lower options-implied negative skewness, or with higher firm-level political risks. The results from regressions adopting the instrumental variable approach and from a quasi-natural experiment suggest that the negative relation observed between policy uncertainty and stock price crash risk is unlikely to be driven by potential endogeneity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策不确定性、坏消息披露与股价暴跌风险
本文记录了经济政策的不确定性通过增加公司披露坏消息的次数来降低未来股价暴跌的风险。我们的测试表明,与政策不确定性低的时期相比,在政策不确定性高的时期,企业会发布更多坏消息--与政策不确定性低的时期相比,它们会使用更多的保守主义会计方法,表现出更强的未来收益反应系数,在财务报告中使用更多的负面语气,其经理在收益电话会议中表达更多的负面情绪。其他分析表明,EPU 与未来股价暴跌风险之间的负相关关系在卖空限制较多、没有活跃交易的信用违约掉期合约、期权隐含负偏度较低或公司层面政治风险较高的公司中更为明显。采用工具变量法的回归结果和准自然实验的结果表明,政策不确定性与股价暴跌风险之间的负相关不太可能是由潜在的内生性引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Empirical Finance is a financial economics journal whose aim is to publish high quality articles in empirical finance. Empirical finance is interpreted broadly to include any type of empirical work in financial economics, financial econometrics, and also theoretical work with clear empirical implications, even when there is no empirical analysis. The Journal welcomes articles in all fields of finance, such as asset pricing, corporate finance, financial econometrics, banking, international finance, microstructure, behavioural finance, etc. The Editorial Team is willing to take risks on innovative research, controversial papers, and unusual approaches. We are also particularly interested in work produced by young scholars. The composition of the editorial board reflects such goals.
期刊最新文献
High-frequency realized stochastic volatility model Jump tail risk exposure and the cross-section of stock returns Time-varying variance decomposition of macro-finance term structure models Technological shocks and stock market volatility over a century Is firm-level political risk priced in the corporate bond market?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1