Experimental Bracket Design Performance on Bonding and Polymerization of Orthodontic Composite.

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY BioMed Research International Pub Date : 2024-06-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/7457900
Alexandre Daher Yunes Salgado, Victor Pinheiro Feitosa, Manuela Timbó Farrapo, Tainah Oliveira Rifane, Lara Leal Ribeiro, Andressa Silva de Oliveira, Diego Lomonaco
{"title":"Experimental Bracket Design Performance on Bonding and Polymerization of Orthodontic Composite.","authors":"Alexandre Daher Yunes Salgado, Victor Pinheiro Feitosa, Manuela Timbó Farrapo, Tainah Oliveira Rifane, Lara Leal Ribeiro, Andressa Silva de Oliveira, Diego Lomonaco","doi":"10.1155/2024/7457900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the enamel bonding ability and orthodontic adhesive resin degree of conversion using the experimental bracket design. <i>Material and Methods</i>. Thirteen bovine teeth were used in the study. The experimental bracket was modified with a translucent region in the center of its body. After enamel etching, Orthocem orthodontic adhesive (FGM, Joinville, Brazil) was applied on the bracket base for bonding. The groups were divided as follows (<i>n</i> = 10 per group): (1) control (CB) with standard brackets and (2) spot bracket (SB) with experimental brackets featuring a 0.8 mm translucent region at the center using carbide bur. Shear bond strength (SBS) was evaluated after 24 hours in a universal testing machine and adhesive remnant index (ARI). The degree of conversion (DC) was analyzed using Raman spectroscopy (<i>n</i> = 3 per group). Data were then analyzed using Student's <i>t</i>-test and Mann-Whitney statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SB group exhibited a higher mean SBS (10.33 MPa) compared to the CB Group (8.77 MPa). However, there was no statistical difference between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.376). Both SB and CB groups had a mean ARI score of 1. Raman analysis revealed a higher degree of conversion in the SB group (49.3%) compared to the CB group (25.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The experimental support showed a higher degree of adhesive conversion, although there was no significant increase in bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":9007,"journal":{"name":"BioMed Research International","volume":"2024 ","pages":"7457900"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMed Research International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7457900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the enamel bonding ability and orthodontic adhesive resin degree of conversion using the experimental bracket design. Material and Methods. Thirteen bovine teeth were used in the study. The experimental bracket was modified with a translucent region in the center of its body. After enamel etching, Orthocem orthodontic adhesive (FGM, Joinville, Brazil) was applied on the bracket base for bonding. The groups were divided as follows (n = 10 per group): (1) control (CB) with standard brackets and (2) spot bracket (SB) with experimental brackets featuring a 0.8 mm translucent region at the center using carbide bur. Shear bond strength (SBS) was evaluated after 24 hours in a universal testing machine and adhesive remnant index (ARI). The degree of conversion (DC) was analyzed using Raman spectroscopy (n = 3 per group). Data were then analyzed using Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney statistical methods.

Results: The SB group exhibited a higher mean SBS (10.33 MPa) compared to the CB Group (8.77 MPa). However, there was no statistical difference between the groups (p = 0.376). Both SB and CB groups had a mean ARI score of 1. Raman analysis revealed a higher degree of conversion in the SB group (49.3%) compared to the CB group (25.9%).

Conclusions: The experimental support showed a higher degree of adhesive conversion, although there was no significant increase in bond strength.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验托槽设计对正畸复合材料的粘合和聚合性能的影响
目的采用实验托槽设计,评估牙釉质粘接能力和正畸粘接树脂的转化程度。材料和方法。研究使用了 13 颗牛牙。实验托槽的主体中央有一个半透明区域。珐琅质蚀刻后,在托槽底座上涂抹 Orthocem 正畸粘合剂(FGM,Joinville,巴西)进行粘接。各组划分如下(每组 10 人):(1) 使用标准托槽的对照组 (CB);(2) 使用实验托槽的点托槽 (SB),实验托槽中心有一个 0.8 毫米的半透明区域,使用硬质合金毛刺。24 小时后在万能试验机上对剪切粘接强度(SBS)和粘合剂残留指数(ARI)进行评估。使用拉曼光谱分析转换度(DC)(每组 n = 3)。然后使用学生 t 检验和 Mann-Whitney 统计方法对数据进行分析:结果:SB 组的平均 SBS(10.33 兆帕)高于 CB 组(8.77 兆帕)。但是,两组之间没有统计学差异(P = 0.376)。拉曼分析显示,与 CB 组(25.9%)相比,SB 组的转化率更高(49.3%):结论:虽然粘接强度没有显著提高,但实验支持物显示出更高的粘接转化率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BioMed Research International
BioMed Research International BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1942
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: BioMed Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in life sciences and medicine. The journal is divided into 55 subject areas.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Impact of Biological Agents on Protecting Against Experimental Periodontitis: A Systematic Review of Animal-Based Studies. Induction of Innate Immune Memory in LPS-Primed Microglial Cells by Water-Soluble Chitosan. Indigenous Knowledge and Quantitative Analysis of Medicinal Plants Used to Remedy Respiratory Tract Disorders in Mid-Western Tanzania. Comparison of Gut Microbiomes Between Neonates Born by Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery: Prospective Observational Study. Biodegradation Study of Biomaterials Composed of Acrylated Epoxidized Soybean Oil: An In Vitro Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1