{"title":"Effect of implant‒abutment connections on abutment screw loosening: An in vitro study.","authors":"Feridoun Parnia, Amin Nourizadeh, Elnaz Shafiee","doi":"10.34172/joddd.29883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The widespread use of dental implants as a predictable treatment choice has drawn attention to their complications as a major challenge despite their high clinical success rates. In this context, loosening of the abutment screw in posterior single crowns is the most common problem; the use of adequate preload and proper anti-rotational features at implant‒abutment interface appear to be two main solutions to such a problem. The present study evaluated the effect of implant‒abutment connections in four different implant systems before and after cyclic loading.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intra-Lock, Dentis, Xive, and Dio implant systems were used in this study. Each system underwent one million cycles of dynamic forces eight times with a magnitude of 110 N. For each specimen after tightening the screw with a torque of 32 Ncm, the detorque values were measured and recorded by a digital torquemeter after and before cyclic loading. Data were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Levene's, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial detorque values between the study groups showed significant differences (<i>P</i><0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed significantly lower primary detorque values in the Dentis system compared to the three other systems (<i>P</i><0.0001). After cyclic loading, significant differences were observed between the study groups (<i>P</i><0.0001). Pairwise comparisons of the groups showed significant differences between all the systems after loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The type of implant‒abutment connection is an essential factor influencing the amount of abutment screw loosening.</p>","PeriodicalId":15599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","volume":"18 1","pages":"17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.29883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The widespread use of dental implants as a predictable treatment choice has drawn attention to their complications as a major challenge despite their high clinical success rates. In this context, loosening of the abutment screw in posterior single crowns is the most common problem; the use of adequate preload and proper anti-rotational features at implant‒abutment interface appear to be two main solutions to such a problem. The present study evaluated the effect of implant‒abutment connections in four different implant systems before and after cyclic loading.
Methods: Intra-Lock, Dentis, Xive, and Dio implant systems were used in this study. Each system underwent one million cycles of dynamic forces eight times with a magnitude of 110 N. For each specimen after tightening the screw with a torque of 32 Ncm, the detorque values were measured and recorded by a digital torquemeter after and before cyclic loading. Data were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Levene's, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests.
Results: Initial detorque values between the study groups showed significant differences (P<0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed significantly lower primary detorque values in the Dentis system compared to the three other systems (P<0.0001). After cyclic loading, significant differences were observed between the study groups (P<0.0001). Pairwise comparisons of the groups showed significant differences between all the systems after loading.
Conclusion: The type of implant‒abutment connection is an essential factor influencing the amount of abutment screw loosening.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects (JODDD) is a Platinum* Open Access, peer-reviewed quarterly indexed journal that publishes articles of basic, clinical, and prospective nature in all areas of dentistry and oral health.