Immunologic Benefits of 0-antigen Mismatched Transplants: No Added Boost for Racial and Ethnic Minorities.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-06-13 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001653
Jillian S Caldwell, Gomathy Parvathinathan, Margaret R Stedman, Patrick Ahearn, Jane C Tan, Xingxing S Cheng
{"title":"Immunologic Benefits of 0-antigen Mismatched Transplants: No Added Boost for Racial and Ethnic Minorities.","authors":"Jillian S Caldwell, Gomathy Parvathinathan, Margaret R Stedman, Patrick Ahearn, Jane C Tan, Xingxing S Cheng","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic barriers to posttransplant care, including access to immunosuppressant medications, contribute to higher rates of kidney transplant failure in racial minorities. Matching donor and recipient HLA alleles reduce allorecognition, easing reliance on immunosuppression. We hypothesize that 0-antigen mismatch transplants may provide stronger protection against graft loss in racial minorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared adult, single-organ, deceased-donor kidney transplants in the United States from 2007 to 2016 by degree of HLA mismatch (0- versus ≥1-antigen mismatch). We examined time-to-allograft failure, with death as a competing event, using multivariable Weibull models, stratified by recipient race (White versus non-White), and evaluated the interaction between mismatch and recipient race. We used Kaplan-Meier imputation to account for competing risk of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 102 114 transplants (median follow-up, 5.6 y; 16 862 graft losses, 18 994 deaths). Zero-antigen mismatch was associated with improved allograft survival (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.85). When stratified by recipient race, the effect of 0-antigen mismatch was more pronounced in White (unadjusted sHR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83) versus non-White recipients (sHR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99; interaction <i>P</i> = 0.04). The differential effect was attenuated after adjusting for covariates (sHR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84 versus sHR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; interaction <i>P</i> = 0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zero-antigen mismatch transplants conferred a 20% risk reduction in allograft loss, which was similar between non-White and White recipients. This may reflect an increased degree of mismatch at other HLA alleles and non-HLA alleles in non-White recipients or because of the extent of systemic barriers to healthcare borne by minority recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systemic barriers to posttransplant care, including access to immunosuppressant medications, contribute to higher rates of kidney transplant failure in racial minorities. Matching donor and recipient HLA alleles reduce allorecognition, easing reliance on immunosuppression. We hypothesize that 0-antigen mismatch transplants may provide stronger protection against graft loss in racial minorities.

Methods: We compared adult, single-organ, deceased-donor kidney transplants in the United States from 2007 to 2016 by degree of HLA mismatch (0- versus ≥1-antigen mismatch). We examined time-to-allograft failure, with death as a competing event, using multivariable Weibull models, stratified by recipient race (White versus non-White), and evaluated the interaction between mismatch and recipient race. We used Kaplan-Meier imputation to account for competing risk of death.

Results: We analyzed 102 114 transplants (median follow-up, 5.6 y; 16 862 graft losses, 18 994 deaths). Zero-antigen mismatch was associated with improved allograft survival (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.85). When stratified by recipient race, the effect of 0-antigen mismatch was more pronounced in White (unadjusted sHR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83) versus non-White recipients (sHR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99; interaction P = 0.04). The differential effect was attenuated after adjusting for covariates (sHR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84 versus sHR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; interaction P = 0.10).

Conclusions: Zero-antigen mismatch transplants conferred a 20% risk reduction in allograft loss, which was similar between non-White and White recipients. This may reflect an increased degree of mismatch at other HLA alleles and non-HLA alleles in non-White recipients or because of the extent of systemic barriers to healthcare borne by minority recipients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
0 抗原不匹配移植的免疫学益处:对少数种族和人种没有额外的促进作用。
背景:移植后护理的系统性障碍,包括获得免疫抑制药物,导致少数种族肾移植失败率较高。供体和受体 HLA 等位基因匹配可减少异体识别,减轻对免疫抑制的依赖。我们假设,0 抗原错配移植可为少数种族提供更强的保护,防止移植失败:我们比较了 2007 年至 2016 年美国成人、单器官、已故供体肾脏移植的 HLA 错配程度(0 抗原错配与≥1 抗原错配)。我们使用多变量Weibull模型,按受者种族(白人与非白人)分层,研究了移植失败的时间(死亡为竞争事件),并评估了错配与受者种族之间的交互作用。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 估算法来考虑死亡的竞争风险:我们分析了 102 114 例移植(中位随访 5.6 年;16 862 例移植物丢失,18 994 例死亡)。零抗原错配与异体移植物存活率的提高有关(调整后的亚分布危险比[sHR]为0.80;95%置信区间[CI]为0.75-0.85)。当按受者种族分层时,0-抗原不匹配对白人(未调整 sHR 0.78;95% CI,0.72-0.83)和非白人受者(sHR 0.88;95% CI,0.79-0.99;交互作用 P = 0.04)的影响更为明显。调整协变量后,差异效应减弱(sHR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84 versus sHR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; interaction P = 0.10):结论:零抗原错误配型移植可使同种异体移植物丢失的风险降低20%,非白人和白人受者的风险相似。这可能反映了非白人受者在其他HLA等位基因和非HLA等位基因上的不匹配程度增加,也可能是因为少数族裔受者在医疗保健方面面临的系统性障碍的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond 75: Graft Allocation and Organ Utility Implications in Liver Transplantation. Clinical Translation and Implementation of a Bioartificial Pancreas Therapy: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives of People With Type 1 Diabetes. Making Living-donor Liver Transplantation a Viable Option for Patients With Portopulmonary Hypertension. Outcomes of Older Primary Kidney Transplant Recipients by Induction Agent and High-risk Viral Discordance Status in the United States. Molecular Signature Associated With Acute Rejection in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1