Neoadjuvant Multiagent Systemic Therapy Approach to Liver Transplantation for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001760
Nadine Soliman, Ashton A Connor, Ashish Saharia, Sudha Kodali, Ahmed Elaileh, Khush Patel, Samar Semaan, Tamneet Basra, David W Victor, Caroline J Simon, Yee Lee Cheah, Mark J Hobeika, Constance M Mobley, Mukul Divatia, Sadhna Dhingra, Mary Schwartz, Anaum Maqsood, Kirk Heyne, Maen Abdelrahim, Milind Javle, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey, A Osama Gaber, R Mark Ghobrial
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Multiagent Systemic Therapy Approach to Liver Transplantation for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Nadine Soliman, Ashton A Connor, Ashish Saharia, Sudha Kodali, Ahmed Elaileh, Khush Patel, Samar Semaan, Tamneet Basra, David W Victor, Caroline J Simon, Yee Lee Cheah, Mark J Hobeika, Constance M Mobley, Mukul Divatia, Sadhna Dhingra, Mary Schwartz, Anaum Maqsood, Kirk Heyne, Maen Abdelrahim, Milind Javle, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey, A Osama Gaber, R Mark Ghobrial","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCCA) has excellent outcomes following liver transplantation (LT). Neoadjuvant radiation-based locoregional therapy is standard-of-care. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) combination systemic therapies have improved outcomes in advanced settings, but their efficacy pre-LT has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We review our experience following neoadjuvant gem/cis alone versus radiation-based approaches. Patients with phCCA undergoing LT at a single center between January 2008 and February 2023 were identified retrospectively. Neoadjuvant therapy was categorized as gem/cis systemic therapy (ST) alone, or any ST and radiotherapy (RT). Outcomes were posttransplant overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), waitlist time, and pathologic tumor response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During study period, 27 phCCA patients underwent LT. One patient decompensated with neoadjuvant therapy and was excluded. Median age was 61 y (interquartile range, 53-68 y) and 14 (54%) were male. Of 26 patients, 12 (46%) received ST and 14 (54%) RT. Six RT patients received gem/cis ST. Median waitlist time was 199 d (interquartile range, 98-405 d) and did not differ by neoadjuvant regimen. Explanted tumors were predominantly T1 stage, without lymphovascular invasion or nodal involvement. Neither pathologic features nor percent tumor necrosis differed by regimen. OS probabilities at 1 and 3 y were 84% and 55% for the cohort. There was no significant difference in OS and RFS when stratified by regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-LT OS, RFS, waitlist time, and tumor response were similar in the 2 groups. Patients with phCCA who do not undergo RT may still be considered for LT under appropriate institution-based protocols that adhere to other established criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 3","pages":"e1760"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCCA) has excellent outcomes following liver transplantation (LT). Neoadjuvant radiation-based locoregional therapy is standard-of-care. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) combination systemic therapies have improved outcomes in advanced settings, but their efficacy pre-LT has not been studied.

Methods: We review our experience following neoadjuvant gem/cis alone versus radiation-based approaches. Patients with phCCA undergoing LT at a single center between January 2008 and February 2023 were identified retrospectively. Neoadjuvant therapy was categorized as gem/cis systemic therapy (ST) alone, or any ST and radiotherapy (RT). Outcomes were posttransplant overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), waitlist time, and pathologic tumor response.

Results: During study period, 27 phCCA patients underwent LT. One patient decompensated with neoadjuvant therapy and was excluded. Median age was 61 y (interquartile range, 53-68 y) and 14 (54%) were male. Of 26 patients, 12 (46%) received ST and 14 (54%) RT. Six RT patients received gem/cis ST. Median waitlist time was 199 d (interquartile range, 98-405 d) and did not differ by neoadjuvant regimen. Explanted tumors were predominantly T1 stage, without lymphovascular invasion or nodal involvement. Neither pathologic features nor percent tumor necrosis differed by regimen. OS probabilities at 1 and 3 y were 84% and 55% for the cohort. There was no significant difference in OS and RFS when stratified by regimen.

Conclusions: Post-LT OS, RFS, waitlist time, and tumor response were similar in the 2 groups. Patients with phCCA who do not undergo RT may still be considered for LT under appropriate institution-based protocols that adhere to other established criteria.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝门周围胆管癌肝移植的新辅助多药系统治疗方法。
背景:肝门周围胆管癌(phCCA)在肝移植(LT)后预后良好。以新辅助放射为基础的局部治疗是标准治疗。吉西他滨和顺铂(gem/cis)联合全身治疗改善了晚期患者的预后,但其在肝移植前的疗效尚未得到研究。方法:我们回顾了新辅助gem/cis单独治疗与放射治疗的经验。回顾性分析2008年1月至2023年2月间在单一中心接受肝移植的phCCA患者。新辅助治疗分为单独的gem/cis全身治疗(ST)或任何ST和放疗(RT)。结果是移植后总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期(RFS)、等待名单时间和病理肿瘤反应。结果:在研究期间,27例phCCA患者接受了lt治疗,1例患者因新辅助治疗失代偿而被排除。中位年龄为61岁(四分位数范围为53-68岁),男性14例(54%)。在26例患者中,12例(46%)接受ST治疗,14例(54%)接受RT治疗。6例RT患者接受gem/cis ST治疗,中位等待时间为199 d(四分位数范围,98-405 d),新辅助方案没有差异。外植肿瘤主要为T1期,无淋巴血管浸润或淋巴结累及。不同治疗方案的病理特征和肿瘤坏死百分比均无差异。该队列在1年和3年的OS概率分别为84%和55%。按方案分层时,OS和RFS无显著差异。结论:两组术后OS、RFS、等待时间和肿瘤反应相似。未接受RT治疗的phCCA患者仍可考虑在符合其他既定标准的适当机构方案下进行LT治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. The Evolution of Molecular Phenotypes Through Time in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Donation After Circulatory Death Islets are Comparable to Standard-of-Care Donation After Brain Death Islets: Analysis of 801 Consecutive Human Islet Isolations. Varying Perfusate Hemoglobin During Normothermic Ex Situ Heart Perfusion: Elevated Hemoglobin Exacerbates Functional Decline Through Hemolysis. Reduction in Red Blood Cell Lysis by Polymer Intervention During Rodent Liver Normothermic Machine Perfusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1