Commentary: Engagement for Research and Quality Improvement - More Than Just Words.

Kerry Kuluski, Katie Dainty, Kelly M Smith
{"title":"Commentary: Engagement for Research and Quality Improvement - More Than Just Words.","authors":"Kerry Kuluski, Katie Dainty, Kelly M Smith","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2024.27322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We reflect on the paper from Hahn-Goldberg et al. (2024) who shared key learnings from a pan-Canadian quality improvement (QI) and patient engagement care transition initiative called Bridge-to-Home. In considering the approach and outcomes presented in their paper, we have generated reflections and practical suggestions on how to amplify engagement work even further: (1) patient engagement and QI are about relationships; (2) seamlessly implementing complex interventions across siloed organizations continues to be a challenge, which engagement alone cannot solve; (3) it is time for a paradigm shift; (4) QI is about human behaviour change and is inherently messy; and (5) embedding fulsome evaluation of engagement is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":39763,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)","volume":"27 1","pages":"51-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2024.27322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We reflect on the paper from Hahn-Goldberg et al. (2024) who shared key learnings from a pan-Canadian quality improvement (QI) and patient engagement care transition initiative called Bridge-to-Home. In considering the approach and outcomes presented in their paper, we have generated reflections and practical suggestions on how to amplify engagement work even further: (1) patient engagement and QI are about relationships; (2) seamlessly implementing complex interventions across siloed organizations continues to be a challenge, which engagement alone cannot solve; (3) it is time for a paradigm shift; (4) QI is about human behaviour change and is inherently messy; and (5) embedding fulsome evaluation of engagement is essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评论:参与研究和质量改进--不仅仅是说说而已。
我们对 Hahn-Goldberg 等人(2024 年)的论文进行了反思,他们分享了一项名为 "Bridge-to-Home "的泛加拿大质量改进(QI)和患者参与护理过渡计划的主要经验。在考虑他们论文中介绍的方法和成果时,我们对如何进一步扩大参与工作进行了反思并提出了切实可行的建议:(1)患者参与和 QI 关系密切;(2)在各自为政的组织中无缝实施复杂的干预措施仍然是一项挑战,仅靠参与无法解决这一问题;(3)现在是转变模式的时候了;(4)QI 关系到人类行为的改变,本质上是混乱的;以及(5)对参与进行全面评估至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)
Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Governing boards of healthcare organizations in Canada are accountable for the performance of their organization and provide oversight on their decisions. Traditionally, many healthcare boards have focused on finances and community relations and have deferred responsibility for quality of care.
期刊最新文献
Routine Collection of Patient-Reported Data to Support the Needs of Primary Care Within an Integrated Healthcare System. Sex-Based Differences in Mental Health Service Use Between Canadian Veterans and Non-Veterans Residing in Ontario. "The Space Is as Much Yours as It Is Mine": Insights From Health System Leaders About Inclusive Leadership. A Primer on Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare Administrators. Bridge-to-Home: A Case Study of the Mutually Reinforcing Benefits of Patient Engagement-Focused Quality Improvement Initiatives for Transitions out of Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1