Comparison of the CPR Feedback Device Effect on the Effective Technique of the CPR in Two Modes of the Device Warning Being On and Off.

IF 0.5 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS ARYA Atherosclerosis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.48305/arya.2022.39288.2840
Amirreza Sajjadieh Khajouei, Maryam Rabbani, Parvin Bahrami
{"title":"Comparison of the CPR Feedback Device Effect on the Effective Technique of the CPR in Two Modes of the Device Warning Being On and Off.","authors":"Amirreza Sajjadieh Khajouei, Maryam Rabbani, Parvin Bahrami","doi":"10.48305/arya.2022.39288.2840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a major public health problem with over 90% case fatality. Although it is known that good quality of cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) leads to improved patient outcomes, health care practitioners commonly perform sub-optimal CPR. The CPR feedback device is a small device designed to measure the number and depth of chest compressions (CC) and if the rate of compressions or the depth of the compressions is low or high, it will try to correct the CPR operation by announcing a warning to the resuscitator. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this device which was designed and made by the authors' technician study group member in improving CPR operations, to determine the need for it in all hospitals on a routine basis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed on patients who have suffered from cardio-pulmonary arrest in Al-Zahra Hospital in 2020. Patients needed primary CPR for any reason, were randomly divided into two groups using random allocation software. The first group contains patients as the CPR Feedback device is on and alarm is on and warns, if resuscitation is ineffective, the second group also uses the device, but with the difference that the alarm is off. The data was analyzed by general linear model method (repeated measure ANOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 patients were studied, including 63 men (79%) and 17 women (21%). Patients were divided among two groups. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics between two groups. The results showed that there was no significant interaction between group and time for the compression depth variable and there was no significant difference in the depth of compressions between the two groups(P>0.05). For the rate of compressions, there was a significant interaction between group and time. These results indicate that turning on the CPR feedback device's warning increases the number of compressions during CPR and, as a result, makes it more effective. The between-group effect which showed the difference in the number of compressions in the two groups, was statistically significant (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicated that turning on the CPR feedback device's warning increases the rate of compressions during CPR and, as a result, makes it more effective. Therefore, the use of real-time CPR feedback device during chest compression in real-time CPR improves the quality of CPR.</p>","PeriodicalId":46477,"journal":{"name":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","volume":"19 5","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48305/arya.2022.39288.2840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a major public health problem with over 90% case fatality. Although it is known that good quality of cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) leads to improved patient outcomes, health care practitioners commonly perform sub-optimal CPR. The CPR feedback device is a small device designed to measure the number and depth of chest compressions (CC) and if the rate of compressions or the depth of the compressions is low or high, it will try to correct the CPR operation by announcing a warning to the resuscitator. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this device which was designed and made by the authors' technician study group member in improving CPR operations, to determine the need for it in all hospitals on a routine basis.

Method: This cross-sectional study was performed on patients who have suffered from cardio-pulmonary arrest in Al-Zahra Hospital in 2020. Patients needed primary CPR for any reason, were randomly divided into two groups using random allocation software. The first group contains patients as the CPR Feedback device is on and alarm is on and warns, if resuscitation is ineffective, the second group also uses the device, but with the difference that the alarm is off. The data was analyzed by general linear model method (repeated measure ANOVA).

Results: 80 patients were studied, including 63 men (79%) and 17 women (21%). Patients were divided among two groups. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics between two groups. The results showed that there was no significant interaction between group and time for the compression depth variable and there was no significant difference in the depth of compressions between the two groups(P>0.05). For the rate of compressions, there was a significant interaction between group and time. These results indicate that turning on the CPR feedback device's warning increases the number of compressions during CPR and, as a result, makes it more effective. The between-group effect which showed the difference in the number of compressions in the two groups, was statistically significant (P<0.001).

Conclusion: These results indicated that turning on the CPR feedback device's warning increases the rate of compressions during CPR and, as a result, makes it more effective. Therefore, the use of real-time CPR feedback device during chest compression in real-time CPR improves the quality of CPR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较心肺复苏反馈装置在装置警告开启和关闭两种模式下对心肺复苏有效技术的影响。
导言:院外心脏骤停是一个重大的公共卫生问题,死亡率超过 90%。尽管众所周知,高质量的心肺复苏(CPR)可改善患者的预后,但医疗从业人员通常会进行次优的心肺复苏。心肺复苏反馈装置是一种用于测量胸外按压(CC)次数和深度的小型装置,如果按压频率或按压深度过低或过高,它将通过向复苏者发出警告来纠正心肺复苏操作。本研究的目的是评估由作者的技师研究小组成员设计和制造的这一装置在改善心肺复苏操作方面的有效性,以确定是否有必要在所有医院进行常规使用:这项横断面研究的对象是 2020 年在 Al-Zahra 医院就诊的心肺骤停患者。因任何原因需要进行初级心肺复苏术的患者通过随机分配软件被随机分为两组。第一组患者使用心肺复苏反馈装置,如果复苏无效,警报器会打开并发出警告;第二组患者也使用该装置,但不同之处在于警报器是关闭的。数据采用一般线性模型法(重复测量方差分析)进行分析:研究了 80 名患者,其中男性 63 人(占 79%),女性 17 人(占 21%)。患者分为两组。两组患者的人口统计学特征无明显差异。结果显示,在按压深度变量上,组别与时间之间无明显交互作用,两组按压深度无明显差异(P>0.05)。在按压速度方面,组别与时间之间存在显著的交互作用。这些结果表明,打开心肺复苏反馈装置的警告会增加心肺复苏的按压次数,从而使心肺复苏更加有效。显示两组按压次数差异的组间效应在统计学上具有重要意义(PC 结论:这些结果表明,打开心肺复苏反馈装置的警告会提高心肺复苏按压的频率,从而使心肺复苏更加有效。因此,在实时心肺复苏的胸外按压过程中使用实时心肺复苏反馈装置可提高心肺复苏的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARYA Atherosclerosis
ARYA Atherosclerosis CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiomyopathy discovered during pregnancy: Insights from speckle tracking echocardiography in a cohort of pregnant patients. Cardioprotective effects of aerobic training in diabetic rats: Reducing cardiac apoptotic indices and oxidative stress for a healthier heart. Effects of balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty on longitudinal changes in right ventricular strain and strain rate in pediatric pulmonary stenosis. Forty-seven years of Iranian cardiovascular disease scientific publication: A bibliometric and altmetric analysis. The assessment of no-reflow phenomenon incidence in early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention following a primary fibrinolysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1