Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in advance aged patients.

IF 0.6 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS ARYA Atherosclerosis Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.48305/arya.2023.41535.2884
Roxana Sadeghi
{"title":"Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in advance aged patients.","authors":"Roxana Sadeghi","doi":"10.48305/arya.2023.41535.2884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on outcomes in elderly patients compared to younger patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An observational case-control study was conducted involving 535 patients, divided into two groups: older adults (≥75 years) and younger adults (<75 years). All patients underwent CABG following a similar protocol. The primary endpoints focused on early post-procedure outcomes, including in-hospital mortality and the duration of ICU or hospital stay. Patients were followed up for six months, and secondary study endpoints included long-term mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction, re-hospitalization rates, and repeated revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>535 patients who underwent CABG were enrolled in this study. The smoking habit was significantly higher among younger adults (38.2% vs. 12.5%, P=0.001). Hypertension was more prevalent among older adults than younger adults (75% vs. 60%, P=0.044). LDL cholesterol serum levels were higher among younger adult patients (94.9±32.5 vs. 80.9±32.9, P=0.028). In-hospital death was not significantly different between younger and older adults (2.8% vs. 5.0%, P=0.34). Mortality in the six-month follow-up was non-significantly higher in the elderly (2.1% vs. 8.1%, P=0.06).A significant proportion of patients in both groups (46.9% in younger patients vs. 40% in older ones, P=0.40) received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) prior to CABG due to a recent myocardial infarction and receipt of a new stent, but without increased major bleeding in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CABG should be considered a viable treatment option for elderly patients with acceptable operative risk in current clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46477,"journal":{"name":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","volume":"19 4","pages":"37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48305/arya.2023.41535.2884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the impact of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on outcomes in elderly patients compared to younger patients.

Method: An observational case-control study was conducted involving 535 patients, divided into two groups: older adults (≥75 years) and younger adults (<75 years). All patients underwent CABG following a similar protocol. The primary endpoints focused on early post-procedure outcomes, including in-hospital mortality and the duration of ICU or hospital stay. Patients were followed up for six months, and secondary study endpoints included long-term mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction, re-hospitalization rates, and repeated revascularization.

Results: 535 patients who underwent CABG were enrolled in this study. The smoking habit was significantly higher among younger adults (38.2% vs. 12.5%, P=0.001). Hypertension was more prevalent among older adults than younger adults (75% vs. 60%, P=0.044). LDL cholesterol serum levels were higher among younger adult patients (94.9±32.5 vs. 80.9±32.9, P=0.028). In-hospital death was not significantly different between younger and older adults (2.8% vs. 5.0%, P=0.34). Mortality in the six-month follow-up was non-significantly higher in the elderly (2.1% vs. 8.1%, P=0.06).A significant proportion of patients in both groups (46.9% in younger patients vs. 40% in older ones, P=0.40) received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) prior to CABG due to a recent myocardial infarction and receipt of a new stent, but without increased major bleeding in both groups.

Conclusion: CABG should be considered a viable treatment option for elderly patients with acceptable operative risk in current clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高龄患者的冠状动脉旁路移植术。
简介:本研究旨在评估与年轻患者相比,冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)对老年患者预后的影响:本研究旨在评估与年轻患者相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)对老年患者预后的影响:方法:进行一项观察性病例对照研究,将 535 名患者分为两组:老年人(≥75 岁)和年轻人:本研究共纳入了 535 名接受心血管造影术的患者。年轻人的吸烟率明显更高(38.2% 对 12.5%,P=0.001)。高血压在老年人中的发病率高于年轻人(75% 对 60%,P=0.044)。年轻成人患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇血清水平更高(94.9±32.5 vs. 80.9±32.9,P=0.028)。年轻人和老年人的院内死亡率无明显差异(2.8% vs. 5.0%,P=0.34)。两组患者中都有相当比例的患者(年轻患者为46.9%,老年患者为40%,P=0.40)在接受CABG手术前接受了双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT),原因是近期发生了心肌梗死和接受了新的支架,但两组患者的大出血都没有增加:结论:在目前的临床实践中,对于手术风险可接受的老年患者,CABG 应被视为一种可行的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARYA Atherosclerosis
ARYA Atherosclerosis CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Isfahan familial hypercholesterolemia cohort (IFHC) study: Methods, insights and early results. Association between the bifurcation angle and the angle of the origin of the left anterior descending with the severity of coronary artery disease. Mortality after emergency lower limb amputation due to ischemia: A case series. Predicting treatment outcomes by door-to-device time and baseline characteristics in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI: a cross-sectional study in southern Iran. Escaping voluntary confinement: A framework to address Stockholm syndrome in cardiac nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1