A multi-label dataset and its evaluation for automated scoring system for cleanliness assessment in video capsule endoscopy.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1007/s13246-024-01441-w
Palak Handa, Nidhi Goel, S Indu, Deepak Gunjan
{"title":"A multi-label dataset and its evaluation for automated scoring system for cleanliness assessment in video capsule endoscopy.","authors":"Palak Handa, Nidhi Goel, S Indu, Deepak Gunjan","doi":"10.1007/s13246-024-01441-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An automated scoring system for cleanliness assessment during video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is presently lacking. The present study focused on developing an approach to automatically assess the cleanliness in VCE frames as per the latest scoring i.e., Korea-Canada (KODA). Initially, an easy-to-use mobile application called artificial intelligence-KODA (AI-KODA) score was developed to collect a multi-label image dataset of twenty-eight patient capsule videos. Three readers (gastroenterology fellows), who had been trained in reading VCE, rated this dataset in a duplicate manner. The labels were saved automatically in real-time. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were checked. The developed dataset was then randomly split into train:validate:test ratio of 70:20:10 and 60:20:20. It was followed by a comprehensive benchmarking and evaluation of three multi-label classification tasks using ten machine learning and two deep learning algorithms. Reliability estimation was found to be overall good among the three readers. Overall, random forest classifier achieved the best evaluation metrics, followed by Adaboost, KNeighbours, and Gaussian naive bayes in the machine learning-based classification tasks. Deep learning algorithms outperformed the machine learning-based classification tasks for only VM labels. Thorough analysis indicates that the proposed approach has the potential to save time in cleanliness assessment and is user-friendly for research and clinical use. Further research is required for the improvement of intra-rater reliability of KODA, and the development of automated multi-task classification in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01441-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An automated scoring system for cleanliness assessment during video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is presently lacking. The present study focused on developing an approach to automatically assess the cleanliness in VCE frames as per the latest scoring i.e., Korea-Canada (KODA). Initially, an easy-to-use mobile application called artificial intelligence-KODA (AI-KODA) score was developed to collect a multi-label image dataset of twenty-eight patient capsule videos. Three readers (gastroenterology fellows), who had been trained in reading VCE, rated this dataset in a duplicate manner. The labels were saved automatically in real-time. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were checked. The developed dataset was then randomly split into train:validate:test ratio of 70:20:10 and 60:20:20. It was followed by a comprehensive benchmarking and evaluation of three multi-label classification tasks using ten machine learning and two deep learning algorithms. Reliability estimation was found to be overall good among the three readers. Overall, random forest classifier achieved the best evaluation metrics, followed by Adaboost, KNeighbours, and Gaussian naive bayes in the machine learning-based classification tasks. Deep learning algorithms outperformed the machine learning-based classification tasks for only VM labels. Thorough analysis indicates that the proposed approach has the potential to save time in cleanliness assessment and is user-friendly for research and clinical use. Further research is required for the improvement of intra-rater reliability of KODA, and the development of automated multi-task classification in this field.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于视频胶囊内窥镜清洁度自动评分系统的多标签数据集及其评估。
视频胶囊内窥镜检查(VCE)过程中的清洁度自动评估评分系统目前还很缺乏。本研究的重点是根据最新的评分标准,即韩国-加拿大(KODA),开发一种自动评估 VCE 图像清洁度的方法。最初,研究人员开发了一款名为人工智能-KODA(AI-KODA)评分的易用移动应用程序,用于收集二十八个患者胶囊视频的多标签图像数据集。三位接受过 VCE 阅读培训的读者(胃肠病学研究员)以重复方式对该数据集进行评分。标签实时自动保存。对评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性进行了检查。然后,将所开发的数据集按 70:20:10 和 60:20:20 的比例随机分成训练:验证:测试两部分。随后,使用十种机器学习算法和两种深度学习算法对三个多标签分类任务进行了全面的基准测试和评估。结果发现,三位读者的可靠性估计总体良好。总体而言,在基于机器学习的分类任务中,随机森林分类器取得了最佳评价指标,其次是Adaboost、KNeighbours和高斯天真贝叶斯。在基于机器学习的分类任务中,深度学习算法仅在虚拟机标签方面的表现优于基于机器学习的分类任务。透彻的分析表明,所提出的方法具有节省清洁度评估时间的潜力,而且对研究和临床使用非常友好。要提高 KODA 的评分者内部可靠性并开发该领域的自动多任务分类,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1