Mortality prediction model from combined serial lactate, procalcitonin and calprotectin levels in critically ill patients with sepsis: A retrospective study according to Sepsis-3 definition

{"title":"Mortality prediction model from combined serial lactate, procalcitonin and calprotectin levels in critically ill patients with sepsis: A retrospective study according to Sepsis-3 definition","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>1) To evaluate the ability of baseline and on 24 h serum calprotectin, in comparison to canonical biomarkers (lactate and procalcitonin), for prognosis of 28-day mortality in critically ill septic patients; and 2) To develop a predictive model combining the three biomarkers.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A single-center, retrospective study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Intensive Care Unit of a university hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or participants</h3><div>One hundred and seventy three septic pacientes were included.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div><span>Measurement of baseline lactate, procalcitonin and </span>calprotectin<span> level and procalcitonin and calprotectin levels on 24 h.</span></div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>Demographics and comorbidities, SOFA score on ICU admission, baseline lactate, procalcitonin and calprotectin on admission and on 24 h and 28-day mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1) On ICU admission, lactate was the only biomarker achieving a significant accuracy (AUC: 0.698); 2) On 24 h, no differences were found on procalcitonin and calprotectin levels. Procalcitonin and calprotectin clearances were significantly lower in non-survivors and both achieved a moderate performance (AUCs: 0.668 and 0.664, respectively); 3) A biomarker based-model achieved a significant accuracy (AUC: 0.766), trending to increase (AUC: 0.829) to SOFA score alone; y 4) Baseline lactate levels and procalcitonin and calprotectin clearance were independent predictors for the outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>1) Baseline and on 24 h calprotectina and procalcitonin levels lacked ability in predicting 28-day mortality; 2) Accuracy of clearance of both biomarkers was moderate; and 3) Combination of SOFA score and the predictive biomarker based-model showed a high prognostic accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"48 11","pages":"Pages 629-638"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724001383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

1) To evaluate the ability of baseline and on 24 h serum calprotectin, in comparison to canonical biomarkers (lactate and procalcitonin), for prognosis of 28-day mortality in critically ill septic patients; and 2) To develop a predictive model combining the three biomarkers.

Design

A single-center, retrospective study.

Setting

Intensive Care Unit of a university hospital.

Patients or participants

One hundred and seventy three septic pacientes were included.

Interventions

Measurement of baseline lactate, procalcitonin and calprotectin level and procalcitonin and calprotectin levels on 24 h.

Main variables of interest

Demographics and comorbidities, SOFA score on ICU admission, baseline lactate, procalcitonin and calprotectin on admission and on 24 h and 28-day mortality.

Results

1) On ICU admission, lactate was the only biomarker achieving a significant accuracy (AUC: 0.698); 2) On 24 h, no differences were found on procalcitonin and calprotectin levels. Procalcitonin and calprotectin clearances were significantly lower in non-survivors and both achieved a moderate performance (AUCs: 0.668 and 0.664, respectively); 3) A biomarker based-model achieved a significant accuracy (AUC: 0.766), trending to increase (AUC: 0.829) to SOFA score alone; y 4) Baseline lactate levels and procalcitonin and calprotectin clearance were independent predictors for the outcome.

Conclusions

1) Baseline and on 24 h calprotectina and procalcitonin levels lacked ability in predicting 28-day mortality; 2) Accuracy of clearance of both biomarkers was moderate; and 3) Combination of SOFA score and the predictive biomarker based-model showed a high prognostic accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据脓毒症重症患者的乳酸、降钙素原和钙黏蛋白联合序列水平建立死亡率预测模型:根据败血症-3定义的回顾性研究。
目的:1)评估基线和24小时血清钙蛋白与典型生物标志物(乳酸和降钙素原)相比,对重症脓毒症患者28天死亡率的预后能力;2)建立一个结合三种生物标志物的预测模型:设计:单中心回顾性研究:患者或参与者:173 名脓毒症患者:患者或参与者:173 名脓毒症患者:干预措施:测量基线乳酸、降钙素原和钙蛋白水平,以及 24 小时内的降钙素原和钙蛋白水平:主要研究变量:人口统计学和合并症、入ICU时的SOFA评分、入院时和24 h的基线乳酸、降钙素原和钙蛋白以及28天的死亡率:1)在入住重症监护室时,乳酸盐是唯一一个具有显著准确性的生物标志物(AUC:0.698);2)在 24 小时内,降钙素原和钙蛋白水平没有差异。非幸存者的降钙素原和钙黏蛋白清除率明显较低,两者均达到中等水平(AUC:分别为 0.668 和 0.664);3)基于生物标记物的模型具有显著的准确性(AUC:0.766),与单独的 SOFA 评分相比呈上升趋势(AUC:0.829);4)基线乳酸水平、降钙素原和钙黏蛋白清除率是预测结果的独立因素:结论:1)基线和 24 小时的钙蛋白和降钙素水平缺乏预测 28 天死亡率的能力;2)两种生物标志物清除率的准确性适中;3)SOFA 评分和基于生物标志物的预测模型的组合显示出较高的预后准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlation and concordance of HACOR and IROX scales in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received non-invasive ventilation in two intensive care units. From geometric equations to dynamic strategies: advances in the personalization of mechanical ventilation through mechanical power. High flow in tracheostomized patients on their first attempt to wean from mechanical ventilation: More questions on the table. Shocked and moved. Early mobilisation in cardiogenic shock. Early mobilisation in patients with shock and receiving vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1