[THE RISK FOR CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT COPY NUMBER VARIANTS IN PREGNANCIES WITH TWO SOFT MARKERS].

Harefuah Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Amihood Singer, Julia Grinshpun-Cohen, Lena Sagi-Dain
{"title":"[THE RISK FOR CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT COPY NUMBER VARIANTS IN PREGNANCIES WITH TWO SOFT MARKERS].","authors":"Amihood Singer, Julia Grinshpun-Cohen, Lena Sagi-Dain","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Soft sonographic markers, such as an intracardiac echogenic focus, are demonstrated in one out of 150 live births and are associated with a slightly increased risk of trisomy 21 and 18. In the case of an isolated soft marker, the recommendation to perform invasive tests such as amniocentesis or placental cyst testing depends to a large extent on the results of biochemical first and second trimester maternal serum screening. In the case of two soft markers, the women are referred to genetic counseling, and invasive testing is funded by the Ministry of Health.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the risk for clinically significant copy number variants (CNVs) in pregnancies with two soft markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included all prenatal microarray tests performed during 2013-2021, due to demonstration of two soft markers (namely: echogenic intracardiac foci, choroid plexus cyst, single umbilical artery and mild pyelectasis). The rates of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) microarray findings were compared to a previously published cohort of 7235 pregnancies with normal ultrasound, in which 87 (1.2%) abnormal CNVs were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 150 pregnancies with two soft markers, two (1.3%) clinically significant CNVs were found. The rate of abnormal microarray findings did not differ from baseline risk in pregnancies with normal ultrasound - relative risk of 1.11 (95% confidence interval 0.28-4.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk for abnormal microarray findings in pregnancies with two soft markers was not significantly increased in comparison to control group of pregnancies with normal sonography.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These results undermine the current national policy of genetic counseling and Ministry of Health-funded invasive testing in pregnancies with a combination of two soft markers. These findings are important for additional countries with similar management, and may facilitate the genetic counseling and informed decision-making in such cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":101459,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"163 6","pages":"365-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Soft sonographic markers, such as an intracardiac echogenic focus, are demonstrated in one out of 150 live births and are associated with a slightly increased risk of trisomy 21 and 18. In the case of an isolated soft marker, the recommendation to perform invasive tests such as amniocentesis or placental cyst testing depends to a large extent on the results of biochemical first and second trimester maternal serum screening. In the case of two soft markers, the women are referred to genetic counseling, and invasive testing is funded by the Ministry of Health.

Objectives: To estimate the risk for clinically significant copy number variants (CNVs) in pregnancies with two soft markers.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all prenatal microarray tests performed during 2013-2021, due to demonstration of two soft markers (namely: echogenic intracardiac foci, choroid plexus cyst, single umbilical artery and mild pyelectasis). The rates of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) microarray findings were compared to a previously published cohort of 7235 pregnancies with normal ultrasound, in which 87 (1.2%) abnormal CNVs were noted.

Results: Of the 150 pregnancies with two soft markers, two (1.3%) clinically significant CNVs were found. The rate of abnormal microarray findings did not differ from baseline risk in pregnancies with normal ultrasound - relative risk of 1.11 (95% confidence interval 0.28-4.40).

Conclusions: The risk for abnormal microarray findings in pregnancies with two soft markers was not significantly increased in comparison to control group of pregnancies with normal sonography.

Discussion: These results undermine the current national policy of genetic counseling and Ministry of Health-funded invasive testing in pregnancies with a combination of two soft markers. These findings are important for additional countries with similar management, and may facilitate the genetic counseling and informed decision-making in such cases.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[两种软标记的妊娠中出现有临床意义的拷贝数变异的风险]。
导言:每 150 例活产中就有 1 例出现心内回声灶等软声像图标记,这与 21 三体和 18 三体风险略有增加有关。如果是孤立的软标记,是否建议进行羊膜腔穿刺术或胎盘囊肿检测等侵入性检 查,在很大程度上取决于第一和第二孕期母体血清生化筛查的结果。如果有两个软标记物,则将妇女转介到遗传咨询机构,侵入性检测由卫生部资助:目的:估算使用两种软标记物的孕妇出现具有临床意义的拷贝数变异(CNV)的风险:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2013-2021 年间因显示两个软标记物(即:心内回声灶、脉络丛囊肿、单脐动脉和轻度脐膨出)而进行的所有产前微阵列检测。将具有临床意义(致病和可能致病)的芯片发现率与之前发表的 7235 例超声检查正常的孕妇进行了比较,其中发现了 87 个(1.2%)异常 CNV:结果:在有两个软标记物的 150 例妊娠中,发现了两个(1.3%)具有临床意义的 CNV。微阵列异常发现率与超声检查正常的孕妇的基线风险没有差异--相对风险为 1.11(95% 置信区间为 0.28-4.40):结论:与超声检查正常的对照组相比,使用两种软标记物的孕妇微阵列结果异常的风险没有明显增加:讨论:这些结果削弱了目前由卫生部资助的对合并两种软标记物的孕妇进行遗传咨询和侵入性检测的国家政策。这些研究结果对其他实行类似管理的国家非常重要,可促进在此类情况下的遗传咨询和知情决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[LISTENING FOR SAFETY]. [POST-ORGASMIC ILLNESS SYNDROME]. [RAPID GENOMIC HUMAN IDENTIFICATION BY "LAB-ON-A-CHIP" TECHNOLOGIES DURING "IRON SWORDS" WAR]. [SEX AND GENDER DIFFERENCES IN EXPOSURE TO CHILDHOOD VIOLENCE AND ITS EFFECT IN ADULTHOOD ON CHRONIC PHYSICAL MORBIDITY]. [TRAUMA-INFORMED CARE IN THE PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM: CLINICAL IMPORTANCE, PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1