The band count imprecision - a Croatian multicentric pilot study.

Vanja Radišić Biljak, Višnja Jureša, Valentina Vidranski, Ivana Vuga, Franciska Tomić, Fran Smaić, Martina Horvat, Branka Krešić, Brankica Šimac, Ivana Lapić
{"title":"The band count imprecision - a Croatian multicentric pilot study.","authors":"Vanja Radišić Biljak, Višnja Jureša, Valentina Vidranski, Ivana Vuga, Franciska Tomić, Fran Smaić, Martina Horvat, Branka Krešić, Brankica Šimac, Ivana Lapić","doi":"10.11613/BM.2024.020803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to high inter-observer variability the 2015 International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations state to count band neutrophils as segmented neutrophils in the white blood cell (WBC) differential. However, the inclusion of bands as a separate cell entity within the WBC differential is still widely used in hematology laboratories in Croatia. The aim of this multicentric study was to assess the degree of inter-observer variability in enumerating band neutrophils within the WBC differential among Croatian laboratories.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seven large Croatian hospital laboratories from different parts of the country participated in the study. In each of 7 participating laboratories, one blood smear, that was flagged by the analyzer as possibly having bands, was evaluated by all personnel participating in the analysis of hematology samples. Between-observer manual smear reproducibility was expressed as coefficient of variation (CV) and calculated using the following formula: CV (%) = (standard deviation (SD)/mean value) x 100%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CVs (%) and relative band neutrophil counts in participating laboratories were as follows: 15.4% (16-24), 19.2% (16-32), 19.5% (17-40), 21.1% (17-44), 35.0% (8-26), 51.9% (3-29), and remarkably high 62.4% (12-59). For segmented neutrophils CVs were lower, ranging from 7.4% to 32.2%. The CVs did not correlate with the number of staff members in each hospital (P = 0.293).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed very high variability in enumerating band neutrophil count in the blood smear differential among all participants, thus prompting a need for action on a national level.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"34 2","pages":"020803"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2024.020803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Due to high inter-observer variability the 2015 International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations state to count band neutrophils as segmented neutrophils in the white blood cell (WBC) differential. However, the inclusion of bands as a separate cell entity within the WBC differential is still widely used in hematology laboratories in Croatia. The aim of this multicentric study was to assess the degree of inter-observer variability in enumerating band neutrophils within the WBC differential among Croatian laboratories.

Materials and methods: Seven large Croatian hospital laboratories from different parts of the country participated in the study. In each of 7 participating laboratories, one blood smear, that was flagged by the analyzer as possibly having bands, was evaluated by all personnel participating in the analysis of hematology samples. Between-observer manual smear reproducibility was expressed as coefficient of variation (CV) and calculated using the following formula: CV (%) = (standard deviation (SD)/mean value) x 100%.

Results: The CVs (%) and relative band neutrophil counts in participating laboratories were as follows: 15.4% (16-24), 19.2% (16-32), 19.5% (17-40), 21.1% (17-44), 35.0% (8-26), 51.9% (3-29), and remarkably high 62.4% (12-59). For segmented neutrophils CVs were lower, ranging from 7.4% to 32.2%. The CVs did not correlate with the number of staff members in each hospital (P = 0.293).

Conclusions: This study revealed very high variability in enumerating band neutrophil count in the blood smear differential among all participants, thus prompting a need for action on a national level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波段计数不精确--克罗地亚多中心试点研究。
导言:由于观察者之间的差异很大,2015 年国际血液学标准化委员会(ICSH)建议在白细胞(WBC)鉴别中将带状中性粒细胞作为分段中性粒细胞计数。然而,克罗地亚的血液学实验室仍在广泛使用将带状中性粒细胞作为一个单独的细胞实体纳入白细胞鉴别中。这项多中心研究旨在评估克罗地亚实验室在白细胞鉴别中计数带状中性粒细胞时观察者之间的差异程度:来自克罗地亚不同地区的七家大型医院实验室参与了这项研究。在 7 个参与研究的实验室中,每个实验室都由所有参与血液样本分析的人员对分析仪标记为可能有带状中性粒细胞的血涂片进行评估。观察者之间手工涂片再现性以变异系数(CV)表示,计算公式如下:CV(%)=(标准偏差(SD)/平均值)x100%:参与实验室的变异系数(%)和相对带状中性粒细胞计数如下:15.4% (16-24)、19.2% (16-32)、19.5% (17-40)、21.1% (17-44)、35.0% (8-26)、51.9% (3-29),显著偏高的是 62.4% (12-59)。分段中性粒细胞的 CV 值较低,从 7.4% 到 32.2% 不等。CV与每家医院的员工人数无关(P = 0.293):这项研究表明,在所有参与者中,血涂片差值中的带状中性粒细胞计数差异非常大,因此需要在全国范围内采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are we ready to integrate advanced artificial intelligence models in clinical laboratory? Implementation of new Westgard rules suggested by the Westgard Advisor software for five immunological parameters. Levothyroxine therapy reduces endocan and total cholesterol concentrations in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. Red blood cell agglutination caused by ceftriaxone and its effect on erythrocyte parameters: a case report. Serum progastrin-releasing peptide in pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and early-stage primary lung cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1